On Wednesday 03 June 2009 08:52:22 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> I switched from dispatch-conf to conf-update a while ago and much prefer
> it. The merging is more flexible and rarely has problems as you describe.
Well I'm still using etc-update. The only difficult case is when squid is
updated on my p
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 06:21:10 +0100, Graham Murray wrote:
> Is there any way to improve the granularity in the merge function of
> dispatch-conf, or make it more intelligent?
>
> The particular situation where it gives me problems is in configuration
> files where the value of an option has been
On Mittwoch 03 Juni 2009, Graham Murray wrote:
> Is there any way to improve the granularity in the merge function of
> dispatch-conf, or make it more intelligent?
>
> The particular situation where it gives me problems is in configuration
> files where the value of an option has been manually chan
On Jun 3, 2009, at 12:21 AM, Graham Murray wrote:
Is there any way to improve the granularity in the merge function of
dispatch-conf, or make it more intelligent?
The particular situation where it gives me problems is in
configuration
files where the value of an option has been manually cha
Is there any way to improve the granularity in the merge function of
dispatch-conf, or make it more intelligent?
The particular situation where it gives me problems is in configuration
files where the value of an option has been manually changed following
initial installation, then on an upgrade
5 matches
Mail list logo
