Re: [gentoo-user] decplean left libtunepimp.la behind

2011-05-19 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 16:17 on Thursday 19 May 2011, Paul Hartman did opine thusly: > On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Mick wrote: > > On Wednesday 18 May 2011 22:28:38 Alan McKinnon wrote: > >> Apparently, though unproven, at 23:06 on Wednesday 18 May 2011, Mick did > >> opine > >> >

Re: [gentoo-user] decplean left libtunepimp.la behind

2011-05-19 Thread Paul Hartman
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Mick wrote: > On Wednesday 18 May 2011 22:28:38 Alan McKinnon wrote: >> Apparently, though unproven, at 23:06 on Wednesday 18 May 2011, Mick did >> opine >> >> thusly: >> > Had a depclean session which removed: >> >  media-libs/musicbrainz >> > >> >     selected: 2

Re: [gentoo-user] decplean left libtunepimp.la behind

2011-05-18 Thread Mick
On Wednesday 18 May 2011 22:28:38 Alan McKinnon wrote: > Apparently, though unproven, at 23:06 on Wednesday 18 May 2011, Mick did > opine > > thusly: > > Had a depclean session which removed: > > media-libs/musicbrainz > > > > selected: 2.1.5 > > > >protected: none > > > >

Re: [gentoo-user] decplean left libtunepimp.la behind

2011-05-18 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:06 on Wednesday 18 May 2011, Mick did opine thusly: > Had a depclean session which removed: > > media-libs/musicbrainz > selected: 2.1.5 >protected: none > omitted: 3.0.2 > > Then I followed up with revdep-rebuild and this comes up: > > * Gener

Re: [gentoo-user] decplean left libtunepimp.la behind

2011-05-18 Thread Paul Hartman
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Mick wrote: > What is "-lmusicbrainz" and is it telling me to just delete > /usr/lib/libtunepimp.la? It's a library for accessing music metadata from http://musicbrainz.org/ I think the *.la file might be left over because it was changed after being emerged (say,

[gentoo-user] decplean left libtunepimp.la behind

2011-05-18 Thread Mick
Had a depclean session which removed: media-libs/musicbrainz selected: 2.1.5 protected: none omitted: 3.0.2 Then I followed up with revdep-rebuild and this comes up: * Generated new 1_files.rr * Collecting complete LD_LIBRARY_PATH * Generated new 2_ldpath.rr * Checking dynami