On Mon, 5 Sep 2005 20:35:10 -0700
Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bob,
>I don't think this was ever the point. The question was: "For this
> specific machine what would be the best flags?"
>
You;ll hate this - it depends on what your main apps do. Are they i/o
intensive,
compute
On 9/5/05, Bob Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you want to prove that Opterons are faster than Xeons, you'll buy a copy
> of the PathScale
> compiler for the Opterons and use Intel's compiler for the Xeons.
>
> Bob
Bob,
I don't think this was ever the point. The question was: "For th
On Sun, 4 Sep 2005 21:59:10 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In either case, I wouldn't want to extrapolate Xeon Irwindale results
> to all Intel X86 chips, let alone AMD. /usr/portage/app-benchmarks has
> several items in it. Does anybody know which ones have floating-point
> tests?
>
Ther
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 08:21:47AM +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote
> On Sunday 04 September 2005 05:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > CFLAGS="-O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -march=pentium4 -mmmx -msse -msse2
> > -mfpmath=sse"
>
> emm. I would not do this.
>
>
> -mfpmath=sse seems to be slower
I agree with Ellotheth that it seems like there's an opportunity to
come up with a good optimization doc but the paper is interesting. The
answers might not be the same for P4 vs. AMD vs. sparc vs. Apple.
Maybe a suite of files that get compiled, generate the numbers and
instruct you what might wor
On Sunday 04 September 2005 05:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> That list shows pentium4, mmx, sse, and sse2. Also, if you have *ANY*
> version of sse available, you can improve performance by running floating
> point math via sse, rather than 387 instructions. I recommend...
>
> CFLAGS="-O2 -
Hm. Clear, brief, instructive. Smells a lot like a mini-HOWTO.
On 9/3/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are CPU flags and there are USE flags. Some of them have the
> same names, and that may confuse you. It works like this...
> 1) Get a listing of your cpu's flags in
Thanks Walter. That description verifies my guess and gives me a
reason to continue looking at the issue.
I appreciate your help.
Cheers,
Mark
On 9/3/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 09:04:21AM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote
>
> > flags : fpu vme de
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 09:04:21AM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote
> flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
> mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe cid
> xtpr
[...deletia...]
> I then looked for CPU flags that had an equivalent USE flag and t
please check it this is a flash animations proble. if it is then set
XLIB_SKIP_ARGB_VISUALS=yes
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Wednesday 31 August 2005 19:21, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On 8/31/05, Volker Armin Hemmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > before you panic, have you tried the firefox-bin packet with the same
> > site?
> >
> > Maybe nspluginviewer is the culprit? I had to kill it so many times I
> > can'
On 8/31/05, Volker Armin Hemmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> before you panic, have you tried the firefox-bin packet with the same site?
>
> Maybe nspluginviewer is the culprit? I had to kill it so many times I can't
> remember.
Thanks Volker. I'll give it a try.
I'm still interested
Hi,
before you panic, have you tried the firefox-bin packet with the same site?
Maybe nspluginviewer is the culprit? I had to kill it so many times I can't
remember.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Hi,
I've just recently (the last 4 or 5 days) been experiencing some
lock-ups on Firefox. As far as I can tell these seem to come only when
visiting certain web pages that have more multimedia content. When
Firefox locks up it can be killed from a terminal and restarted. There
are no messages in
14 matches
Mail list logo
