Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

On Thu, Oct 13 2011, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Allan Gottlieb wrote: >> >> Not sure what to do now other than wait/hope that 3.2.1 (to be released >> next week) makes it to the overlay and is better for me. > > That's an option, of course. I don't know what els

Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Allan Gottlieb wrote: > On Thu, Oct 13 2011, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 6:34 AM, Allan Gottlieb wrote: >>> I typed that command as root (no complaints) >>> and restarted gdm (twice). >>> Same problem >>> >>> oldlap ~ # dmesg | grep gno

Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

On Thu, Oct 13 2011, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 6:34 AM, Allan Gottlieb wrote: >> I typed that command as root (no complaints) >> and restarted gdm (twice). >> Same problem >> >> oldlap ~ # dmesg | grep gnome-shell >> gnome-shell[3479] general protection ip:b682bdc2 sp:b

Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

On Thu, Oct 13 2011, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > hmm, for sure your problem is not video-related then. gjs is the > javascript-bindings for gnome... You could try keeping spidermonkey > at 1.8.5 and (re-)build the latest version of gjs. google-ing your > problem clearly shows: you are not a

Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 6:34 AM, Allan Gottlieb wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12 2011, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > >> >> gnome-shell segfaults. >> I remember some problems with gnome-shell and GL from the dri-devel-ML. >> What video-card are you using? Drivers/version? >> Is there any other WM you can

Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

On Thursday, 13. October 2011 09:47:03 Allan Gottlieb wrote: > On Thu, Oct 13 2011, Michael Mol wrote: > > I've skipped most of the thread, so forgive me if this was already > > done...try rebuilding libmozjs? Bumping its version up or down? > > oldlap ~ # equery b /usr/lib/libmozjs185.so > * Sea

Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Allan Gottlieb wrote: > On Thu, Oct 13 2011, Michael Mol wrote: > >> I've skipped most of the thread, so forgive me if this was already >> done...try rebuilding libmozjs? Bumping its version up or down? > > oldlap ~ # equery b /usr/lib/libmozjs185.so >  * Searching

Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

On Thu, Oct 13 2011, Michael Mol wrote: > I've skipped most of the thread, so forgive me if this was already > done...try rebuilding libmozjs? Bumping its version up or down? oldlap ~ # equery b /usr/lib/libmozjs185.so * Searching for /usr/lib/libmozjs185.so ... dev-lang/spidermonkey-1.8.5 (/us

Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

On Thu, Oct 13 2011, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > What's the output of lspci | grep VGA? oldlap ~ # lspci -v | grep VGA 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS, 943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) > And just to

Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Allan Gottlieb wrote: > On Thu, Oct 13 2011, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > >> Hi Alan, >> >> Is there something in dmesg related to the gnome-shell segfaults? >> >> Best, >> Michael > > Indeed! > > oldlap ~ # dmesg | grep gnome-shell > gnome-shell[3325] general p

Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

On Wed, Oct 12 2011, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > > gnome-shell segfaults. > I remember some problems with gnome-shell and GL from the dri-devel-ML. > What video-card are you using? Drivers/version? > Is there any other WM you can start, execute > gnome-shell --replace > in a console and dump t

Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

On Thu, Oct 13 2011, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > Hi Alan, > > Is there something in dmesg related to the gnome-shell segfaults? > > Best, > Michael Indeed! oldlap ~ # dmesg | grep gnome-shell gnome-shell[3325] general protection ip:b6853dc2 sp:bfdba6d4 error:0 in libmozjs185.so.1.0.0[b68190

[gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

I've catch problem like this http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/engine?do=post_view_flat;post=240430;page=2;sb=post_latest_reply;so=ASC;mh=25;list=gentoo gdm[-gnome-shell] & gnome-fallback-3.2 work fine (x86 & xf86-video-ati), gnome-shell crash. But on other machine gdm[gnome-shell] & gnome-3.

Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

Hi Alan, On Wednesday, 12. October 2011 21:36:58 Allan Gottlieb wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12 2011, Allan Gottlieb wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 12 2011, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > >> If it is related to the video card/driver that you use, try reemerging > >> cogl and clutter; it doesn't matter that a world

Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Allan Gottlieb wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12 2011, Allan Gottlieb wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 12 2011, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: >> >>> If it is related to the video card/driver that you use, try reemerging >>> cogl and clutter; it doesn't matter that a world upgrade don't

Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

On Wed, Oct 12 2011, Allan Gottlieb wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12 2011, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > >> If it is related to the video card/driver that you use, try reemerging >> cogl and clutter; it doesn't matter that a world upgrade don't want to >> reemerge it, sometimes the ebuilds change without ch

Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

On Wed, Oct 12 2011, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > If it is related to the video card/driver that you use, try reemerging > cogl and clutter; it doesn't matter that a world upgrade don't want to > reemerge it, sometimes the ebuilds change without changing versions. > My versions and useflags of cog

Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Allan Gottlieb wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12 2011, Allan Gottlieb wrote: > >> Here are the logs (update word with gnome-keyring is running now). > > The update world (sorry for the typo above) with gnome-keyring finished > and again gdm flashes the "blue curtain of life"

Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Allan Gottlieb wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12 2011, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > >> On Wednesday, 12. October 2011 18:02:16 Allan Gottlieb wrote: >> >>> Actually the gnome-shell segfault is the 2nd problem.  gdm crashes with >>> Oh no, a problem has occurred unless its

Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Allan Gottlieb wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12 2011, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > >> It's really weird; can I see /var/log/messages (or whatever logger >> file you have)? With Enable=true in the [debug] key on >> /etc/gdm/custom.conf, we should be able to see why gdm is dy

Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

On Wed, Oct 12 2011, Allan Gottlieb wrote: > Here are the logs (update word with gnome-keyring is running now). The update world (sorry for the typo above) with gnome-keyring finished and again gdm flashes the "blue curtain of life" before having its "oh, no death". The video card is intel, buil

Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

On Wed, Oct 12 2011, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > On Wednesday, 12. October 2011 18:02:16 Allan Gottlieb wrote: > >> Actually the gnome-shell segfault is the 2nd problem. gdm crashes with >> Oh no, a problem has occurred unless its gnome-shell use flag is >> disabled, which could possibly be t

Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

On Wed, Oct 12 2011, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > It's really weird; can I see /var/log/messages (or whatever logger > file you have)? With Enable=true in the [debug] key on > /etc/gdm/custom.conf, we should be able to see why gdm is dying. The output is below > My flags are: > > Installed versi

Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > On Wednesday, 12. October 2011 15:08:18 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: >> Anyhow, the logs from gdm failing should tell us something. I don't >> think is the video, like Michael suggested; supposedly gnome-shell >> would detect that. > >

Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

On Wednesday, 12. October 2011 15:08:18 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > Anyhow, the logs from gdm failing should tell us something. I don't > think is the video, like Michael suggested; supposedly gnome-shell > would detect that. Well Canek, you are wrong about that. http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtop

Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

On Wednesday, 12. October 2011 18:02:16 Allan Gottlieb wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12 2011, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > > gnome-shell segfaults. > > I remember some problems with gnome-shell and GL from the dri-devel-ML. > > What video-card are you using? Drivers/version? > > Is there any other WM you

Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Allan Gottlieb wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12 2011, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Allan Gottlieb wrote: >>> >>> I notice that I have the default "accessibility" use flag on. >>> I am tempted to turn it off to reduce the number of packag

Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

On Wed, Oct 12 2011, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > > gnome-shell segfaults. > I remember some problems with gnome-shell and GL from the dri-devel-ML. > What video-card are you using? Drivers/version? > Is there any other WM you can start, execute > gnome-shell --replace > in a console and dump t

Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

On Wed, Oct 12 2011, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Allan Gottlieb wrote: >> >> I notice that I have the default "accessibility" use flag on. >> I am tempted to turn it off to reduce the number of packages >> involved.  Any downside? > > Not that I know of. Can you

Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

On Wednesday, 12. October 2011 16:58:37 Allan Gottlieb wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12 2011, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > > When you do layman --sync-all, sometimes the ebuilds are updated, but > > with the same version. Try to recompile every ebuild in the overlay > > that you have installed in your syste

Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Allan Gottlieb wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12 2011, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > >> When you do layman --sync-all, sometimes the ebuilds are updated, but >> with the same version. Try to recompile every ebuild in the overlay >> that you have installed in your system. At l

Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

On Wed, Oct 12 2011, David Abbott wrote: > Here is the patch to fix totem-pl-parser with the new quvi api > https://386651.bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=289447&action=diff&collapsed=&context=patch&format=raw&headers=1 > HTH > David Thank you. I follow that bug and know about the patch. Sinc

Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Allan Gottlieb wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11 2011, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Allan Gottlieb wrote: >>> For me, gnome 3.2 has been quite a regression over 3.0. >> >> Weird; for me it works so much better than 3.0. >> >>> Summary: >>

Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

On Tue, Oct 11 2011, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Allan Gottlieb wrote: >> For me, gnome 3.2 has been quite a regression over 3.0. > > Weird; for me it works so much better than 3.0. > >> Summary: >> >> gdm-3.2.0-r1 crashes and when I revert to the 3.0 gdm, I get

Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Allan Gottlieb wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 11 2011, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Allan Gottlieb wrote: For me, gnome 3.2 has been quite a regression over 3.0. >>> >

Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Allan Gottlieb wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11 2011, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Allan Gottlieb wrote: >>> For me, gnome 3.2 has been quite a regression over 3.0. >> >> Weird; for me it works so much better than 3.0. >> >>> Summary: >>

Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

On Tue, Oct 11 2011, David Abbott wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Allan Gottlieb wrote: >>> For me, gnome 3.2 has been quite a regression over 3.0. >> >> Weird; for me it works so much better than 3.0. >> > Working OK here

Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

On Tue, Oct 11 2011, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Allan Gottlieb wrote: >> For me, gnome 3.2 has been quite a regression over 3.0. > > Weird; for me it works so much better than 3.0. > >> Summary: >> >> gdm-3.2.0-r1 crashes and when I revert to the 3.0 gdm, I get

Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Allan Gottlieb wrote: >> For me, gnome 3.2 has been quite a regression over 3.0. > > Weird; for me it works so much better than 3.0. > Working OK here also, here is my .xsession-errors http://paste.poco

Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Allan Gottlieb wrote: > For me, gnome 3.2 has been quite a regression over 3.0. Weird; for me it works so much better than 3.0. > Summary: > > gdm-3.2.0-r1 crashes and when I revert to the 3.0 gdm, I get to the > login screen but then gnome-shell crashes.  I trie

[gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)

For me, gnome 3.2 has been quite a regression over 3.0. Summary: gdm-3.2.0-r1 crashes and when I revert to the 3.0 gdm, I get to the login screen but then gnome-shell crashes. I tried to downgrade to gnome-shell-3.0.2-r1, but that needs libgnome-menu, which is not in portage/layman. The crash o