Re: [gentoo-user] btrfs: subvol without compression

2014-07-07 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 20.06.2014 12:07, schrieb Marc Joliet: > From my own google search, at least up to 2011 per-subvolume > compression settings were not possible. Then, after subsequently > searching on the btrfs wiki for a while, I finally found an answer: > no. See this FAQ entry: > > https://btrfs.wiki.kern

Re: [gentoo-user] btrfs: subvol without compression

2014-06-20 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 20.06.2014 12:07, schrieb Marc Joliet: > I don't know if you eventually found an answer yourself, but since > nobody else has replied, here's what I found: [..] > From my own google search, at least up to 2011 per-subvolume > compression settings

Re: [gentoo-user] btrfs: subvol without compression

2014-06-20 Thread Marc Joliet
I don't know if you eventually found an answer yourself, but since nobody else has replied, here's what I found: Am Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:04:08 +0200 schrieb "Stefan G. Weichinger" : > > ... I am quite happy now with the performance of that new server I am > preparing. > > See thread "Intel(R) C6

Re: [gentoo-user] btrfs: subvol without compression

2014-06-17 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 17.06.2014 13:04, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: > BUT it remounts / without compression as well ... ! > > Is it a bug? A mistake or misunderstanding? maybe also related to this bug I filed a while ago: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=510148 Stefan

[gentoo-user] btrfs: subvol without compression

2014-06-17 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
... I am quite happy now with the performance of that new server I am preparing. See thread "Intel(R) C600 SAS Controller" for that story: https://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org/msg146119.html Right now I get quite good results when doing backups of the 2 existing VMs (which