On Tuesday 04 Dec 2012 15:30:04 Dustin C. Hatch wrote:
> On 12/4/2012 06:11, Florian Philipp wrote:
> > Do you actually need broadcom-sta anymore? With the recent kernel
> > updates more chips work with the in-kernel driver (brcmsmac). But the
> > config option is well hidden (you need to enable BC
> The broadcom-sta package works fine for me with several kernels up to
> 3.5.x. But with 3.6.x it fails. This seems to be a known problem, gentoo
> bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=437898
>
> 437898 contains some patches and various comments, but I am surprised
> that the current eb
On 12/4/2012 06:11, Florian Philipp wrote:
Do you actually need broadcom-sta anymore? With the recent kernel
updates more chips work with the in-kernel driver (brcmsmac). But the
config option is well hidden (you need to enable BCMA to even see it).
Yes, I initially tried the b43 driver, which
Am 04.12.2012 09:13, schrieb Dustin C. Hatch:
> On 12/3/2012 19:22, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
>> I believe several on this list use -sta and know many are running 3.6.x.
>> What do you do? I should add that at present running 3.5.x is not a
>> hardship for me.
>>
> I have broadcom-sta working on my no
On 12/3/2012 19:22, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
I believe several on this list use -sta and know many are running 3.6.x.
What do you do? I should add that at present running 3.5.x is not a
hardship for me.
I have broadcom-sta working on my notebook with kernel-3.6, using the
patches in #437898. For
The broadcom-sta package works fine for me with several kernels up to
3.5.x. But with 3.6.x it fails. This seems to be a known problem, gentoo
bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=437898
437898 contains some patches and various comments, but I am surprised
that the current ebuild does not
6 matches
Mail list logo
