On 29.04.2009 14:30, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> In fact, all that's needed is already there (just the other way round,
>> though): every list I'm subscribed to adds a "Precedence" header field
>> (with values of "bulk" or "list") to the messages. A sane auto-responder
>> will not send replies to messa
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:15:30 +0200, Markus Schönhaber wrote:
> > I suppose what we really need is a standard header to be inserted by
> > auto-responders. Then mailing list software can simply ignore any such
> > mails.
>
> In theory a good solution. In practice I doubt it helps.
> Whoever is "
Neil Bothwick:
> I suppose what we really need is a standard header to be inserted by
> auto-responders. Then mailing list software can simply ignore any such
> mails.
In theory a good solution. In practice I doubt it helps.
Whoever is "able" to configure an auto-responder in such a completely
br
>
>> To answer you question: It depends.
>
> I was responding to a statement that any kind of auto-responder is wrong,
> so "it depends" is not allowed :)
so the correct answer is: NO. :-)
>
>
> Another use it to let people know that their mail has been received. I
> company I do work for has
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:42:59 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Unsubscribing the user will have reduced the traffic he is causing by a
> significant margin.
And give the list admins breathing space in which to add a rule to
silently drop messages from that address.
I suppose what we really need is
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:34:11 +0200, KH wrote:
> >> IMHO, setting up any kind of auto-responder is a *huge* mistake.
> >
> > Any kind? Even a well functioning one that send no more than one mail
> > to any address in a day? I use a procmail rule to take care of this,
> > it appears after list filt
On Wednesday 29 April 2009 11:25:41 KH wrote:
> fe...@crowfix.com schrieb:
> > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 05:31:06PM +0200, Xavier Parizet wrote:
> >> As his autoresponder respond to all mail received to his mail address, i
> >> sent at 12h15 a mail "faking" hist email address to
> >> gentoo-user+unsu
Neil Bothwick schrieb:
> On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:12:02 +0200, Jarry wrote:
>
>>> That's a little harsh. He may not even know his company's
>>> auto-responder is so hideously broken.
>> IMHO, setting up any kind of auto-responder is a *huge* mistake.
>
> Any kind? Even a well functioning one that
fe...@crowfix.com schrieb:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 05:31:06PM +0200, Xavier Parizet wrote:
>
>> As his autoresponder respond to all mail received to his mail address, i
>> sent at 12h15 a mail "faking" hist email address to
>> gentoo-user+unsubscr...@lists.gentoo.org and it did the trick...
>> N
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 05:31:06PM +0200, Xavier Parizet wrote:
> As his autoresponder respond to all mail received to his mail address, i
> sent at 12h15 a mail "faking" hist email address to
> gentoo-user+unsubscr...@lists.gentoo.org and it did the trick...
> Now i think he is spammed with "you'
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:12:02 +0200, Jarry wrote:
> > That's a little harsh. He may not even know his company's
> > auto-responder is so hideously broken.
>
> IMHO, setting up any kind of auto-responder is a *huge* mistake.
Any kind? Even a well functioning one that send no more than one mail t
Toppost due to iPhone. I just made a measure through gmail to block
the source of the epic-spammed autoreplies.
On Apr 28, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann > wrote:
On Dienstag 28 April 2009, Jarry wrote:
Daniel de Oliveira wrote:
Yes, moderating him.
He deserves much more than th
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:24:31 +0200, Jarry wrote:
Yes, moderating him.
He deserves much more than that.
Life-time ban for that stupidity would be adequate...
That's a little harsh. He may not even know his company's auto-responder
is so hideously broken.
IMHO, setting
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Dienstag 28 April 2009, Jarry wrote:
Daniel de Oliveira wrote:
Yes, moderating him.
He deserves much more than that.
Life-time ban for that stupidity would be adequate...
you are a flawless person. you never made a little mistake in your life time.
Did you?
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:24:31 +0200, Jarry wrote:
> > Yes, moderating him.
>
> He deserves much more than that.
> Life-time ban for that stupidity would be adequate...
That's a little harsh. He may not even know his company's auto-responder
is so hideously broken.
--
Neil Bothwick
Nostalgia
When I say to moderate him its just for a little time, not life-time.
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:29, Volker Armin Hemmann
wrote:
> On Dienstag 28 April 2009, Jarry wrote:
>> Daniel de Oliveira wrote:
>> > Yes, moderating him.
>>
>> He deserves much more than that.
>> Life-time ban for that stupid
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:24:31 +0200, Jarry wrote:
> Daniel de Oliveira wrote:
>> Yes, moderating him.
As his autoresponder respond to all mail received to his mail address, i
sent at 12h15 a mail "faking" hist email address to
gentoo-user+unsubscr...@lists.gentoo.org and it did the trick...
Now i
On Dienstag 28 April 2009, Jarry wrote:
> Daniel de Oliveira wrote:
> > Yes, moderating him.
>
> He deserves much more than that.
> Life-time ban for that stupidity would be adequate...
>
> Jarry
you are a flawless person. you never made a little mistake in your life time.
Did you?
Daniel de Oliveira wrote:
Yes, moderating him.
He deserves much more than that.
Life-time ban for that stupidity would be adequate...
Jarry
--
___
This mailbox accepts e-mails only from selected mailing-lists!
Everything else is cons
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 09:10:45 -0300, Daniel de Oliveira wrote:
> Where is the moderation?
This list is not moderated.
> Man, its so stupid using Vacancy-auto-respond
> on a mail that you read a lot of mailing lists. We'll receive that to
> every mail sended to him.
It's more a case of a broken a
Where is the moderation? Man, its so stupid using Vacancy-auto-respond
on a mail that you read a lot of mailing lists. We'll receive that to
every mail sended to him.
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 09:06, Daniel de Oliveira wrote:
> Yes, moderating him.
>
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 06:46, zhen wrote:
>>
Yes, moderating him.
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 06:46, zhen wrote:
> Hi.
>
> It seems that somebody has started autoresponder for his email. And now
> it is replying to it's own replies to lists once an hour. It seems like
> an endless mail loop. Is there way to stop it?
>
> Best regards,
> Evgeniy
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:46:46 +0400, zhen wrote:
> It seems that somebody has started autoresponder for his email. And now
> it is replying to it's own replies to lists once an hour. It seems like
> an endless mail loop. Is there way to stop it?
A bug report has already been filed, we'll just have
The list admins have been notified - you can track the issue at
https://bugs.gentoo.org/267740
AllenJB
zhen wrote:
Hi.
It seems that somebody has started autoresponder for his email. And now
it is replying to it's own replies to lists once an hour. It seems like
an endless mail loop. Is there
zhen schrieb:
> Hi.
>
> It seems that somebody has started autoresponder for his email. And now
> it is replying to it's own replies to lists once an hour. It seems like
> an endless mail loop. Is there way to stop it?
>
> Best regards,
> Evgeniy B.
>
I called his company and they promissed to
Hi.
It seems that somebody has started autoresponder for his email. And now
it is replying to it's own replies to lists once an hour. It seems like
an endless mail loop. Is there way to stop it?
Best regards,
Evgeniy B.
26 matches
Mail list logo
