On Saturday 27 January 2007 09:58, Jan Stępień wrote:
> Is it possible to enable some kind of a chooser which would allow me
> to choose whether I'd like to launch Xgl or Xorg? While working on my
> /usr/share/gdm/default.conf I've spotted a server called 'chooser'.
> Could you tell me what is thi
You may choose to start X or Xgl generic way using startx or startxgl scripts.
Out there are some.
m
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Albert Hopkins napisał(a):
> Then you probably don't want to use GDM or any other DM as they are
> primarily designed to "manage" displays that are already selected. What
> you want is more of a chicken-and-egg issue for a display manager.
>
> What you likely need is something to be run from the
Hi Jan,
on Saturday, 2007-01-27 at 15:06:32, you wrote:
> I've begun this thread because of my difficulties with running some
> OpenGL applications, e.g. Americas Army, on my Xgl.
I reckon most in America's army would love to have your problems.
SCNR! =^>
Matthias
--
I prefer encrypted a
Albert Hopkins napisał(a):
> $ startx /path/to/program/that/needs/X.org -- /usr/bin/X
> $ startx -- /usr/bin/Xgl
>
> or whatever. There's probably a dozen other ways to do it. See the
> startx man page for details.
Thanks, I'll take a look at the manual and give it a shot.
Regards,
Jan
--
Mai
On Sat, 2007-01-27 at 15:06 +0100, Jan Stępień wrote:
[...]
> I've begun this thread because of my difficulties with running some
> OpenGL applications, e.g. Americas Army, on my Xgl. If you'd like to
> read any details you can take a look at first posts of this topic.
Then you probably don't wan
Albert Hopkins napisał(a):
> A "chooser" in the GDM/XDMCP sense is a program that lists available
> hosts to log into (via XDMCP).
Thanks. It may be useful some day.
> Why should you need to write anything. Forget GDM and if you want to
> run X then type "X [ENTER]". If you want Xgl then "Xgl [
On Sat, 2007-01-27 at 08:58 +0100, Jan Stępień wrote:
[...]
> Is it possible to enable some kind of a chooser which would allow me to
> choose whether I'd like to launch Xgl or Xorg? While working on my
> /usr/share/gdm/default.conf I've spotted a server called 'chooser'.
> Could you tell me what
As far as I can see there is no chance neither to get my Radeon to
cooperate with open source driver nor to turn on AIGLX with my fglrx, at
least at the moment of writing. It's a pity, but allow me then to return
to the secondary topic of this thread.
Is it possible to enable some kind of a choose
Iain Buchanan napisał(a):
> On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 21:47 +0100, Jan Stępień wrote:
>
> try these exact searches in google (include the site.. bit)
>
> INPUT_DEVICES VIDEO_CARDS site:http://www.gentoo.org
> and
> INPUT_DEVICES VIDEO_CARDS site:http://www.gentoo-wiki.org
I visited gentoo.org and sk
On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 21:47 +0100, Jan Stępień wrote:
> Mick napisał(a):
> > Did you try remerging xorg with the radeon VIDEO_DEVICE flag after you
> > removed
> > the fglrx module?
>
> Actually I haven't heard about this flag. I've just googled for it but
> without any reasonably results. Could
On 1/22/07, Jan Stępień <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[drm:drm_unlock] *ERROR* Process 5256 using kernel context 0
Hmm, looks like kernel DRM is still having some issues.
Try changing your xorg.conf back to Driver "radeon", comment out the
"Option" lines, and then do a full reboot. You might wan
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. napisał(a):
> You other mail had this in the attachment:
>> Section "Device"
>> Identifier "aticonfig-Device[0]"
>> # Driver "radeon"
>> Driver "fglrx"
>> Option "UseInternalAGPGART" "no"
>> Option "VideoOverlay" "on"
>>
On Monday 22 January 2007 14:59, Jan Stępień <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-user] Xgl and direct rendering or 'Would you like Xorg
or Xgl, sir?'':
> I've enabled an option in my kernel called
> CONFIG_DRM_RADEON and compiled it as a loadable mo
Richard Fish napisał(a):
> On 1/22/07, Jan Stępień <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> In fact the radeon module conflicts with fglrx. I've unloaded fglrx,
>> modprobed radeon (verified by lsmod) and relaunched gdm. But it's still
>> refusing to use the new module:
>>
>> (EE) Failed to load module "rade
Mick napisał(a):
> On Monday 22 January 2007 17:29, Jan Stępień wrote:
>
>> In fact the radeon module conflicts with fglrx. I've unloaded fglrx,
>> modprobed radeon (verified by lsmod) and relaunched gdm. But it's still
>> refusing to use the new module:
>>
>> (EE) Failed to load module "radeon"
On Monday 22 January 2007 11:29, Jan Stępień <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-user] Xgl and direct rendering or 'Would you like Xorg
or Xgl, sir?'':
> In fact the radeon module conflicts with fglrx. I've unloaded fglrx,
> modprobed radeon (verif
On Monday 22 January 2007 17:29, Jan Stępień wrote:
> In fact the radeon module conflicts with fglrx. I've unloaded fglrx,
> modprobed radeon (verified by lsmod) and relaunched gdm. But it's still
> refusing to use the new module:
>
> (EE) Failed to load module "radeon" (module does not exist, 0)
On 1/22/07, Jan Stępień <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In fact the radeon module conflicts with fglrx. I've unloaded fglrx,
modprobed radeon (verified by lsmod) and relaunched gdm. But it's still
refusing to use the new module:
(EE) Failed to load module "radeon" (module does not exist, 0)
Actuall
Richard Fish napisał(a):
On 1/20/07, Jan Stępień <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(/lib/modules/2.6.18-gentoo-r4/kernel/drivers/char/drm/drm.ko): Cannot
allocate memory
Try searching dmesg for drm. My guess is either the radeonfb module
is conflicting, or the fglrx module.
-Richard
In fact the
On 1/20/07, Jan Stępień <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(/lib/modules/2.6.18-gentoo-r4/kernel/drivers/char/drm/drm.ko): Cannot
allocate memory
Try searching dmesg for drm. My guess is either the radeonfb module
is conflicting, or the fglrx module.
-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Richard Fish napisał(a):
> On 1/19/07, Jan Stępień <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Please verify my plan. I should recompile my kernel with device drivers
>> -> character devices -> radeon built in (or as a module) and in
>> xorg.conf set driver to "radeon". Am I right?
>
> Yeah, I think that will w
On Saturday 20 January 2007 00:31, Jan Stępień wrote:
> After launching X server with this setting it results in using Mesa
> instead of fglrx, which means NO direct rendering, as proved by glxinfo.
> Beryl cannot be launched because of lack of DRI.
>
> If I turn composite off, the X server is driv
On 1/19/07, Jan Stępień <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please verify my plan. I should recompile my kernel with device drivers
-> character devices -> radeon built in (or as a module) and in
xorg.conf set driver to "radeon". Am I right?
Yeah, I think that will work. Good luck!
-Richard
--
gentoo
On Friday 19 January 2007 15:01, Jan Stępień wrote:
> Jan Stępień napisał(a):
> > Fair enough. Firstly I'll check whether AIGLX will be working with my
> > video card, and in case of failure I'll give xlaunch a shot.
>
> I've reemerged Xorg adding "aiglx" to USE variable, modified
> /etc/X11/xorg.c
On Friday 19 January 2007 16:52, Richard Fish wrote:
> On 1/19/07, Richard Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 1/18/07, Jan Stępień <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > 1. Is it possible to enable somehow direct rendering on Xgl, therefore
> > > allowing OpenGL apps to work as ought to.
> >
> > No..
Richard Fish napisał(a):
> Have you checked your /var/log/Xorg.*.log files? They should reflect
> why the Xgl server is not being accellerated.
Got it! Somewhere around 92% of /var/log/Xorg.94.log, which is logging
Xgl, I've found:
(EE) fglrx(0): Hardware has already been locked.
(II) fglrx(0):
On 1/19/07, Jan Stępień <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When entering default runlevel GDM starts and launches both servers.
First one, Standard, has got direct rendering turned on and OpenGL is
rendered by fglrx driver. OpenGL apps work fine. On the other hand
second server, Xgl, has not got direct r
On 1/19/07, Richard Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/18/07, Jan Stępień <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. Is it possible to enable somehow direct rendering on Xgl, therefore
> allowing OpenGL apps to work as ought to.
No...
Bah, apologies for silly answer already provided by others. This
sh
Hemmann, Volker Armin napisał(a):
> On Thursday 18 January 2007 23:47, Jan Stępień wrote:
>> On 18 Sty, 19:50, "Hemmann, Volker Armin"
>>>
>>> Or you can start a second X with xinit. So you would have one
>>> desktop (on F7)
>>> with Xgl and one (F8) with 'normal' X.
>> This method sounds interesti
On 1/18/07, Jan Stępień <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1. Is it possible to enable somehow direct rendering on Xgl, therefore
allowing OpenGL apps to work as ought to.
No...Xgl is always indirect.
What graphics hardware are you using? If it is anything but ATI, you
should be able to use the aiglx
Jan Stępień napisał(a):
>
> Fair enough. Firstly I'll check whether AIGLX will be working with my
> video card, and in case of failure I'll give xlaunch a shot.
>
I've reemerged Xorg adding "aiglx" to USE variable, modified
/etc/X11/xorg.conf (actually I've been following these instructions:
htt
Novensiles divi Flamen napisał(a):
> I use a script called xlaunch:
>
> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-483004-highlight-xlaunch.html
>
> I run it on my laptop and have absolutely no problems, the xserver
alone won't
> kill your performance.
>
> - Noven
Thanks, sounds interesting.
Hemmann, V
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 23:47 +0100, Jan Stępień wrote:
> On 18 Sty, 19:50, "Hemmann, Volker Armin"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > nope. It isn't.
> > Xgl and direct rendering are exclusive. One or the other.
>
> Pity. That would be lovely.
I'm no expert, but as far as I know, that's the reason w
On Thursday 18 January 2007 23:47, Jan Stępień wrote:
> On 18 Sty, 19:50, "Hemmann, Volker Armin"
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > nope. It isn't.
> > Xgl and direct rendering are exclusive. One or the other.
>
> Pity. That would be lovely.
>
> > Yes.
> >
> > Or you can start a second X with xini
On Friday 19 January 2007 09:17, Jan Stępień wrote:
> >
> > Or you can start a second X with xinit. So you would have one
> > desktop (on F7)
> > with Xgl and one (F8) with 'normal' X.
>
> This method sounds interesting, but I have some doubts. Won't two
> separate X servers be too big challenge fo
On 18 Sty, 19:50, "Hemmann, Volker Armin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> nope. It isn't.
> Xgl and direct rendering are exclusive. One or the other.
>
Pity. That would be lovely.
>
> Yes.
>
> Or you can start a second X with xinit. So you would have one
> desktop (on F7)
> with Xgl and one (F8) wit
On Thursday 18 January 2007 18:32, Jan Stępień wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've been using Xgl for quite a long time without any serious problems.
> Recently I've tried to launch America's Army (emerged one, version
> 2.5.0) on my box, but...
>
> ~ armyops
> Xlib: extension "XFree86-DRI" missing on
Hi everyone,
I've been using Xgl for quite a long time without any serious problems.
Recently I've tried to launch America's Army (emerged one, version
2.5.0) on my box, but...
~ armyops
Xlib: extension "XFree86-DRI" missing on display ":1.0".
Cheat protection disabled
open /dev/[sound/]mixer: N
Hi everyone,
I've been using Xgl for quite a long time without any serious problems.
Recently I've tried to launch America's Army (emerged one, version
2.5.0) on my box, but...
~ armyops
Xlib: extension "XFree86-DRI" missing on display ":1.0".
Cheat protection disabled
open /dev/[sound/]mixer: N
40 matches
Mail list logo
