On Thu, Sep 07 2017, allan gottlieb wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 07 2017, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 6:31 PM, allan gottlieb wrote:
>>>
>>> My system runs gnome3/systemd. I use NetworkManager, which is mostly
>>> working fine.
>>>
>>> At work the desired network is named "nyu
On Thu, Sep 07 2017, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 6:31 PM, allan gottlieb wrote:
>>
>> My system runs gnome3/systemd. I use NetworkManager, which is mostly
>> working fine.
>>
>> At work the desired network is named "nyu". The sysadmins say I need to
>> change at least on
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 6:31 PM, allan gottlieb wrote:
>
> My system runs gnome3/systemd. I use NetworkManager, which is mostly
> working fine.
>
> At work the desired network is named "nyu". The sysadmins say I need to
> change at least one security parameter. When I open the gui it shows
> the
On Wed, Sep 06 2017, Mick wrote:
> On Wednesday, 6 September 2017 22:29:29 BST allan gottlieb wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 06 2017, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> > On 06/09/2017 18:31, allan gottlieb wrote:
>> >> My system runs gnome3/systemd. I use NetworkManager, which is mostly
>> >> working fine.
>> >>
>
On Wednesday, 6 September 2017 22:29:29 BST allan gottlieb wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 06 2017, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On 06/09/2017 18:31, allan gottlieb wrote:
> >> My system runs gnome3/systemd. I use NetworkManager, which is mostly
> >> working fine.
> >>
> >> At work the desired network is named
On Wed, Sep 06 2017, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 06/09/2017 18:31, allan gottlieb wrote:
>> My system runs gnome3/systemd. I use NetworkManager, which is mostly
>> working fine.
>>
>> At work the desired network is named "nyu". The sysadmins say I need to
>> change at least one security parameter
On 06/09/2017 18:31, allan gottlieb wrote:
> My system runs gnome3/systemd. I use NetworkManager, which is mostly
> working fine.
>
> At work the desired network is named "nyu". The sysadmins say I need to
> change at least one security parameter. When I open the gui it shows
> the network conf
My system runs gnome3/systemd. I use NetworkManager, which is mostly
working fine.
At work the desired network is named "nyu". The sysadmins say I need to
change at least one security parameter. When I open the gui it shows
the network configuration parameters (by clicking the gear) and lets me
I'm trying to troubleshoot a weird behaviour with my old Dell XPS. The device
is a Dell Wireless 1397 WLAN Mini-Card, which combines wireless and bluetooth.
Enabling the mini-card using the touch button on the laptop fires up both
devices:
# rfkill list
0: phy0: Wireless LAN
Soft bloc
On February 17, 2017 6:00:56 AM GMT+01:00, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>If I use wireless keyboard and mouse from same company can I use them
>with three computers?
>
>My space is limited, and the boxes are close to each other; in addition
>I have only one monitor.
>
>PC-1: PS/2(Keyboard+Mouse) +
If I use wireless keyboard and mouse from same company can I use them
with three computers?
My space is limited, and the boxes are close to each other; in addition
I have only one monitor.
PC-1: PS/2(Keyboard+Mouse) + DB9 Monitor
PC-2: PS/2(Keyboard+Mouse) + DB9 Monitor
I use KVM switch to contr
The solution I use when dealing with the problem of network software
overwriting '/etc/resolf.conf' is to make that file immutable with
'chattr +i'.
Not quite an answer to your question on nameserver prioritization, but
could be useful to prevent your nameservers from being changed.
-- Marat
On 11 July 2016 at 17:31, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 11/07/2016 10:32, Emanuele Rusconi wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be better to just use the same servers for both wired and
> > wireless? It's what I use and it works flawlessly.
>
> It works flawlessly *for you*, but by no means can you consider it
> c
On 11/07/2016 20:13, Mick wrote:
On Monday 11 Jul 2016 17:31:29 Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 11/07/2016 10:32, Emanuele Rusconi wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to just use the same servers for both wired and
wireless? It's what I use and it works flawlessly.
It works flawlessly *for you*, but by no m
On Monday 11 Jul 2016 17:31:29 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 11/07/2016 10:32, Emanuele Rusconi wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be better to just use the same servers for both wired and
> > wireless? It's what I use and it works flawlessly.
>
> It works flawlessly *for you*, but by no means can you consider it
On 11/07/2016 10:32, Emanuele Rusconi wrote:
> Wouldn't it be better to just use the same servers for both wired and
> wireless? It's what I use and it works flawlessly.
It works flawlessly *for you*, but by no means can you consider it
correct or stable.
There is no guarantee that a wired and wi
Wouldn't it be better to just use the same servers for both wired and
wireless? It's what I use and it works flawlessly.
In that case you have at least a couple of options:
The second line says:
# /etc/resolv.conf.head can replace this line
So, you can just put your preferred servers in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/09/2016 03:25 PM, Mick wrote:
> On Saturday 09 Jul 2016 11:34:59 Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
>> On 07/09/2016 10:53 AM, Mick wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I just noticed my resolv.conf is topped up with the nameservers of the
>>> wireless LAN I happ
On Saturday 09 Jul 2016 11:34:59 Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> On 07/09/2016 10:53 AM, Mick wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I just noticed my resolv.conf is topped up with the nameservers of the
> > wireless LAN I happen to be associated at the time and my wired ethernet
> > nameserver(s) are pushed furt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/09/2016 10:53 AM, Mick wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I just noticed my resolv.conf is topped up with the nameservers of the
> wireless LAN I happen to be associated at the time and my wired ethernet
> nameserver(s) are pushed further down. This happ
Hi All,
I just noticed my resolv.conf is topped up with the nameservers of the
wireless LAN I happen to be associated at the time and my wired ethernet
nameserver(s) are pushed further down. This happens despite the fact that I
have configured my wired ethernet to have a lesser priority than t
On Saturday 28 November 2015 18:55:43 the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> I have a KVM witch IOGEAR that using old type PS/2 ports
> I've tried to connect to it Wireless USB Mouse via USB-to-PS/2 adapter.
>
> It doesn't work :-/
And your question is? :)
Anyway, about the issue you are seeing, this i
I have a KVM witch IOGEAR that using old type PS/2 ports
I've tried to connect to it Wireless USB Mouse via USB-to-PS/2 adapter.
It doesn't work :-/
--
Thelma
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 9:27 PM, Alexander Kapshuk <
alexander.kaps...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 7:55 PM, behrouz khosravi
> wrote:
> >
> > On Nov 17, 2014 9:06 PM, "behrouz khosravi"
> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Nov 17, 2014 8:46 PM, "Alexander Kapshuk" <
> alexander.kaps...@gma
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 7:55 PM, behrouz khosravi wrote:
>
> On Nov 17, 2014 9:06 PM, "behrouz khosravi" wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Nov 17, 2014 8:46 PM, "Alexander Kapshuk"
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 6:58 PM, behrouz khosravi
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > On Nov 17, 2014 7:32 PM, "Alexand
On Nov 17, 2014 9:06 PM, "behrouz khosravi" wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 17, 2014 8:46 PM, "Alexander Kapshuk"
wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 6:58 PM, behrouz khosravi
wrote:
> > >
> > > On Nov 17, 2014 7:32 PM, "Alexander Kapshuk" <
alexander.kaps...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Mon,
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 7:36 PM, behrouz khosravi wrote:
>
> On Nov 17, 2014 8:46 PM, "Alexander Kapshuk"
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 6:58 PM, behrouz khosravi
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Nov 17, 2014 7:32 PM, "Alexander Kapshuk"
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 3:32 P
On Nov 17, 2014 8:46 PM, "Alexander Kapshuk"
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 6:58 PM, behrouz khosravi
wrote:
> >
> > On Nov 17, 2014 7:32 PM, "Alexander Kapshuk" <
alexander.kaps...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 3:32 PM, behrouz khosravi <
bz.khosr...@gmail.com>
> >>
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 7:16 PM, Alexander Kapshuk
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 6:58 PM, behrouz khosravi
> wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 17, 2014 7:32 PM, "Alexander Kapshuk"
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 3:32 PM, behrouz khosravi
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Hm, does wireless
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 6:58 PM, behrouz khosravi wrote:
>
> On Nov 17, 2014 7:32 PM, "Alexander Kapshuk"
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 3:32 PM, behrouz khosravi
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Hm, does wireless device require firmware? Have you installed firmware
>> >> properly?
>> >
On Nov 17, 2014 7:32 PM, "Alexander Kapshuk"
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 3:32 PM, behrouz khosravi
wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Hm, does wireless device require firmware? Have you installed firmware
> >> properly?
> >
> >
> > I dont think so. I have installed gentoo on it before and back then
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 3:32 PM, behrouz khosravi wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Hm, does wireless device require firmware? Have you installed firmware
>> properly?
>
>
> I dont think so. I have installed gentoo on it before and back then I just
> used the genkernel and it was working.
What's the output of 'l
>
>
> Hm, does wireless device require firmware? Have you installed firmware
> properly?
>
I dont think so. I have installed gentoo on it before and back then I just
used the genkernel and it was working.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 17/11/14 14:42, behrouz khosravi wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I was going to install gentoo on my laptop and since I needed an
> easy WPA2 wireless connection I used "system rescue cd" for
> installation. After finishing the installation when I booted gentoo
Hi.
I was going to install gentoo on my laptop and since I needed an easy WPA2
wireless connection I used "system rescue cd" for installation.
After finishing the installation when I booted gentoo the "ifconfig -a"
didnt show my wireless interface. I thought that I have not included the
driver, so
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 15:01:26 -0500
Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 6:29 AM, Alan McKinnon
> wrote:
> > I'm using wicd-1.7.2.4-r1 and a NetGear DGN2200M v2 wireless AP
> > (802.11n)
> >
> > Several times a day, this thing just drops wireless.
>
> Has it always done this? If not, di
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 6:29 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> I'm using wicd-1.7.2.4-r1 and a NetGear DGN2200M v2 wireless AP
> (802.11n)
>
> Several times a day, this thing just drops wireless.
Has it always done this? If not, did anything change around the time
the problem started? Upgrading drivers/
On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 21:26 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:45:37 +
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:29:43 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >
> > > I'm using wicd-1.7.2.4-r1 and a NetGear DGN2200M v2 wireless AP
> > > (802.11n)
> > >
> > > Several time
On 10/30/2012 9:26 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Actually, I hadn't tried that. I use channel 8 and this is at my house.
I've only ever seen 2 other neighbour's APs show up and they both use
channel 1.
But then common sense kicked in. All previous APs have been 802.11g,
this is the first 802.11g, an
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 19:47:34 +0800
Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> outside interference? (usual is a microwave oven) - is there a device
> closer to the AP that stays in better lock because the signal is
> strong enough to override the interference?
There is a long range Siemens cordless phone that hide
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:45:37 +
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:29:43 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> > I'm using wicd-1.7.2.4-r1 and a NetGear DGN2200M v2 wireless AP
> > (802.11n)
> >
> > Several times a day, this thing just drops wireless. I doubt it's my
> > laptop as other
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 01:29:43PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> I'm using wicd-1.7.2.4-r1 and a NetGear DGN2200M v2 wireless AP
> (802.11n)
>
> Several times a day, this thing just drops wireless. I doubt it's my
> laptop as other devices in the house also get affected. When this
> happens I usua
outside interference? (usual is a microwave oven) - is there a device
closer to the AP that stays in better lock because the signal is strong
enough to override the interference?
BillK
On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 13:29 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> I'm using wicd-1.7.2.4-r1 and a NetGear DGN2200M v2 wi
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:29:43 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> I'm using wicd-1.7.2.4-r1 and a NetGear DGN2200M v2 wireless AP
> (802.11n)
>
> Several times a day, this thing just drops wireless. I doubt it's my
> laptop as other devices in the house also get affected.
Have you tried switching to a
I'm using wicd-1.7.2.4-r1 and a NetGear DGN2200M v2 wireless AP
(802.11n)
Several times a day, this thing just drops wireless. I doubt it's my
laptop as other devices in the house also get affected. When this
happens I usually manually reconnect using wicd, it can do this
automatically but there's
"João Matos" wrote:
>Sorry for not letting it clear.
>
>There are two parts at this website. The part I followed is *Part #2*.
>you
>can search for "*Part #2*:". But it is too simple to be relevant.
>
>I have a desktop machine, witch is connected to a wireless router by a
>wired connection. But t
Sorry for not letting it clear.
There are two parts at this website. The part I followed is *Part #2*. you
can search for "*Part #2*:". But it is too simple to be relevant.
I have a desktop machine, witch is connected to a wireless router by a
wired connection. But the wireless router is too far
On Tue, October 2, 2012 3:18 am, João Matos wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> I've been trying to get networkmanager working and use it to share my
> Internet connection with my Android.
>
> I have my wireless card working properly, since I can create a network
> with
> my phone and connect to it, using the
On 9 February 2012 17:00, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it's the first time I have to set up a wireless network on a notebook.
Save yourself some hassle and use either wicd or NetworkManager - both
wrap wpa_supplicant, and make for a much smoother mobile experience.
tor 2012-02-09 klockan 18:00 +0100 skrev Helmut Jarausch:
> Hi,
>
> it's the first time I have to set up a wireless network on a notebook.
>
> How can I find out whether the connection is encrypted or not.
>
> wpa_gui tells me
> Authentication WPA2-PSK
> Encryption TKIP
>
> but
>
> i
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 06:00:03PM +0100, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it's the first time I have to set up a wireless network on a notebook.
>
> How can I find out whether the connection is encrypted or not.
>
> wpa_gui tells me
> Authentication WPA2-PSK
> Encryption TKIP
>
> but
Hi,
it's the first time I have to set up a wireless network on a notebook.
How can I find out whether the connection is encrypted or not.
wpa_gui tells me
Authentication WPA2-PSK
Encryption TKIP
but
iwconfig wlan0
says
Encryption key:off
and on the server (hot spot) I have configur
Am 03.11.2011 23:57, schrieb Mick:
> This sounds familiar. Please check with modinfo any options to switch off
> (e.g. QoS, or power management) when you're loading the module.
modinfo only gives me this options
# modinfo -F parm ath9k
btcoex_enable:Enable wifi-BT coexistence
blink:Enable LED b
On Thursday 03 Nov 2011 13:16:40 Sebastian Beßler wrote:
> Am 02.11.2011 20:39, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
> > Does the wireless card needs a firmware? Do you use an initramfs? I
> > ask since my iwlagn wireless car does, and if I boot using an
> > initramfs, I need to include the firmware file o
Am 02.11.2011 20:39, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
> Does the wireless card needs a firmware? Do you use an initramfs? I
> ask since my iwlagn wireless car does, and if I boot using an
> initramfs, I need to include the firmware file on it for the card to
> work.
No the card need no firmware.
I s
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 3:29 AM, Sebastian Beßler
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a wireless card that works most of the time perfect with the
> ath9k kernel module but not on first boot after a few hours long shutdown.
>
> * Bringing up interface wlan0
> * ERROR: interface wlan0 does not exist
> *
Hi,
I have a wireless card that works most of the time perfect with the
ath9k kernel module but not on first boot after a few hours long shutdown.
* Bringing up interface wlan0
* ERROR: interface wlan0 does not exist
* Ensure that you have loaded the correct kernel module for your hardware
On Friday 09 Sep 2011 14:31:23 BRM wrote:
> - Original Message -
>
> > From: Mick
> > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Wireless Configuration...
> > OK, so if you restore the two lines and this error goes away, can you
> > then initialise the device without any
- Original Message -
> From: Mick
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Wireless Configuration...
> OK, so if you restore the two lines and this error goes away, can you then
> initialise the device without any other errors?
So far as I am aware.
> Assuming that rfkill shows
OK, so if you restore the two lines and this error goes away, can you then
initialise the device without any other errors?
Assuming that rfkill shows all is unlocked and the device active, what does
iwlist wlan0 scan show now?
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally si
- Original Message -
> From: Mick
> On Thursday 08 Sep 2011 04:52:44 BRM wrote:
>> - Original Message -
>>
>> > From: Mick
>
>> > Hmm ... what is the error/warning that comes up?
>>
>> pneumo-martyr wpa_supplicant # /etc/init.d/net.wlan0 start
>> * Bringing up interface
On Thursday 08 Sep 2011 04:52:44 BRM wrote:
> - Original Message -
>
> > From: Mick
> > Hmm ... what is the error/warning that comes up?
>
> pneumo-martyr wpa_supplicant # /etc/init.d/net.wlan0 start
> * Bringing up interface wlan0
> * Starting wpa_supplicant on wlan0 ...
> Line 17
- Original Message -
> From: Mick
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2011 5:32 PM
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Wireless Configuration...
>
> On Tuesday 06 Sep 2011 15:24:33 BRM wrote:
>> - Original Message
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 9:54 AM, BRM wrote:
>> From: Mick
>> On Tuesday 06 Sep 2011 15:24:33 BRM wrote:
>> I don't know if one is causing a clash with the other, so don't try to
>> use
>> both at the same time. If wicd is started automatically when you boot/login,
>> then just use that.
>
> Well,
- Original Message -
> From: Mick
> On Tuesday 06 Sep 2011 15:24:33 BRM wrote:
>> - Original Message -
>> > From: Mick
>> > On Saturday 03 Sep 2011 15:14:27 BRM wrote:
>> >> - Original Message -
>> > I think the above should be either:
>> >
>> > ctrl_interface=
On Tuesday 06 Sep 2011 15:24:33 BRM wrote:
> - Original Message -
>
> > From: Mick
> >
> > On Saturday 03 Sep 2011 15:14:27 BRM wrote:
> >> - Original Message -
> > I think the above should be either:
> >
> > ctrl_interface=/var/run/wpa_supplicant
> > ctrl_interface_group=
- Original Message -
> From: Mick
> On Saturday 03 Sep 2011 15:14:27 BRM wrote:
>> - Original Message -
>> > Assuming that you have built in your kernel or loaded the driver
> module
>> > for your NIC and any firmware blobs have also been loaded, please
> show:
>>
>> Yes. A
On Saturday 03 Sep 2011 15:14:27 BRM wrote:
> - Original Message -
>
> > From: Mick
> > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> > Assuming that you have built in your kernel or loaded the driver module
> > for your NIC and any firmware blobs have also been loaded, please show:
>
> Yes. As I n
- Original Message -
> From: Mick
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Friday, September 2, 2011 11:29 AM
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Wireless Configuration...
>
> On Friday 02 Sep 2011 14:38:56 BRM wrote:
>> - Original Message -
&
On Friday 02 Sep 2011 14:38:56 BRM wrote:
> - Original Message -
>
> > From: Canek Peláez Valdés
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 11:52 PM, BRM wrote:
> >> I still haven't decided what to get for my system to replace the NIC
> >
> > with, but the card I have should be working with my ex
- Original Message -
> From: Canek Peláez Valdés
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 11:52 PM, BRM wrote:
>> I still haven't decided what to get for my system to replace the NIC
> with, but the card I have should be working with my existing 802.11g network
> already; however, it doesn't - I have
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 11:52 PM, BRM wrote:
> I still haven't decided what to get for my system to replace the NIC with,
> but the card I have should be working with my existing 802.11g network
> already; however, it doesn't - I have had to connect my laptop via Ethernet
> cable to my wireless
I still haven't decided what to get for my system to replace the NIC with, but
the card I have should be working with my existing 802.11g network already;
however, it doesn't - I have had to connect my laptop via Ethernet cable to my
wireless bridge to get network access.
/etc/init.d/net.wlan0
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Grant wrote:
>>> I'm on the road connecting to various wireless access points and
>>> sometimes I'm unable to connect and I get the (try 1) (try 2) (try 3)
>>> (timed out) messages in dmesg which makes sense. Other times I get a
>>> different series of messages in
>> I'm on the road connecting to various wireless access points and
>> sometimes I'm unable to connect and I get the (try 1) (try 2) (try 3)
>> (timed out) messages in dmesg which makes sense. Other times I get a
>> different series of messages in dmesg when I'm unable to connect which
>> don't ma
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Grant wrote:
> I'm on the road connecting to various wireless access points and
> sometimes I'm unable to connect and I get the (try 1) (try 2) (try 3)
> (timed out) messages in dmesg which makes sense. Other times I get a
> different series of messages in dmesg
I'm on the road connecting to various wireless access points and
sometimes I'm unable to connect and I get the (try 1) (try 2) (try 3)
(timed out) messages in dmesg which makes sense. Other times I get a
different series of messages in dmesg when I'm unable to connect which
don't make sense to me.
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:58:45AM -0700, BRM wrote:
> - Original Message
>
> > From: Paul Hartman
> > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> > Sent: Fri, July 15, 2011 5:24:48 PM
> > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Wireless N PCMCIA/CardBus Recommendations...
>
- Original Message
> From: Paul Hartman
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Sent: Fri, July 15, 2011 5:24:48 PM
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Wireless N PCMCIA/CardBus Recommendations...
>
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 2:54 PM, wrote:
> > I have always had good
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 2:54 PM, wrote:
> I have always had good luck with Atheros-based cards. HTH.
Me too. Plus, they are usually more likely to be able to do the fun
stuff like master mode, monitor mode, packet injection...
I have always had good luck with Atheros-based cards. HTH.
Terry
- Original Message
> From: Neil Bothwick
> On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 09:42:49 -0700 (PDT), BRM wrote:
>
> > While I am at it, I am also considering getting a new wireless card for
> > my D600 laptop to at least augment the internal b43-legacy supported
> > Broadcom 43xx card that generally
On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 09:42:49 -0700 (PDT), BRM wrote:
> While I am at it, I am also considering getting a new wireless card for
> my D600 laptop to at least augment the internal b43-legacy supported
> Broadcom 43xx card that generally works, but is also a pain to keep
> working.
[snip]
> So that
After several years, I am not getting around to upgrading my wireless router -
from a Linksys WRT54G to a Cisco Linksys E4200.
While I am at it, I am also considering getting a new wireless card for my D600
laptop to at least augment the internal b43-legacy supported Broadcom 43xx card
that gene
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 6:14 AM, CJoeB wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had wireless working just fine back when I was using the
> 2.6.27-gentoo-r8 kernel. Since upgrading to the 2.6.30 series of
> kernels, I haven't been able to get it working. I was using the ipw3945
> driver, but this driver needs TKIP and
On 05/20/10 01:06, Zeerak Mustafa Waseem wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 07:14:35AM -0400, CJoeB wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I had wireless working just fine back when I was using the
>> 2.6.27-gentoo-r8 kernel. Since upgrading to the 2.6.30 series of
>> kernels, I haven't been able to get it workin
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 07:14:35AM -0400, CJoeB wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had wireless working just fine back when I was using the
> 2.6.27-gentoo-r8 kernel. Since upgrading to the 2.6.30 series of
> kernels, I haven't been able to get it working. I was using the ipw3945
> driver, but this driver needs
Hi,
I had wireless working just fine back when I was using the
2.6.27-gentoo-r8 kernel. Since upgrading to the 2.6.30 series of
kernels, I haven't been able to get it working. I was using the ipw3945
driver, but this driver needs TKIP and something else (don't remember
what) set in the cryptogra
On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 10:43 +0100, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> > I don't know if it matters, but I am using wireless-extensions as
> > opposed to wpa-supplicant because it doesn't seem that
> wpa-supplicant
> > supports the Intel 3945 wireless adaptor.
>
> IWL3945 and wpa_supplicant are working ju
Am Donnerstag, 25. März 2010 schrieb CJoeB:
> Hi,
>
> I have an Intel 3945 wireless adaptor in my laptop. I have always used
> the ipw3945 driver in gentoo because I have never had any luck with the
> iwl3945 driver.
> [...]
> Tonight I, again, following the wiki, tried building the iwl3945 drive
Hi,
I have an Intel 3945 wireless adaptor in my laptop. I have always used
the ipw3945 driver in gentoo because I have never had any luck with the
iwl3945 driver.
I currently am running the 2.6.30-r10 linux kernel and previous to that
I ran 2.6.30-r6. For the last 2 kernel builds that I have do
- Original Message
> From: BRM
> From: Mike Edenfield
> > > On 12/2/2009 9:17 PM, BRM wrote:
> > > I have wireless working (b43legacy driver for the Dell Wireless Broadcom)
> through a static configuration in /etc/conf.d/net - basically:
> > > essid_wlan0="myWLAN"
> > > key_MYWLAN="som
- Original Message
From: Mike Edenfield
> > On 12/2/2009 9:17 PM, BRM wrote:
> > I have wireless working (b43legacy driver for the Dell Wireless Broadcom)
> > through a static configuration in /etc/conf.d/net - basically:
> > essid_wlan0="myWLAN"
> > key_MYWLAN="somekey"
> > config_MYWL
On 12/2/2009 9:17 PM, BRM wrote:
I have wireless working (b43legacy driver for the Dell Wireless Broadcom)
through a static configuration in /etc/conf.d/net - basically:
essid_wlan0="myWLAN"
key_MYWLAN="somekey"
config_MYWLAN=( "dhcp" )
preferred_APS= ( "myWLAN" )
I would like to use a tool li
KDE 4 doesn't have an official network manager yet. you can use
net-misc/wicd, it works nice.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 2:17 AM, BRM wrote:
> I have wireless working (b43legacy driver for the Dell Wireless Broadcom)
> through a static configuration in /etc/conf.d/net - basically:
>
> essid_wlan0="m
This is my etc/conf.d/net file:
modules=( "wpa_supplicant" )
wpa_supplicant_wlan0="-Dwext"
preferred_aps=("ESSID1" "ESSID2")
essid_wlan0="any"
All specific stuff is in /wpa_supplicant/supplicant.conf
Zeerak
On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:17:15 +0100, BRM wrote:
I have wireless working (b43legacy dri
I have wireless working (b43legacy driver for the Dell Wireless Broadcom)
through a static configuration in /etc/conf.d/net - basically:
essid_wlan0="myWLAN"
key_MYWLAN="somekey"
config_MYWLAN=( "dhcp" )
preferred_APS= ( "myWLAN" )
I would like to use a tool like WPA Supplicant instead so I can
i solved it. thanks ;)
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Albert Hopkins wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 20:20 +0800, Xi Shen wrote:
>> my laptop is thinkpad t61, and wireless card is intel pro/wireless
>> 3945abg (according to the lspci output). i have configured my kernel
>> as instructed by the
On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 20:20 +0800, Xi Shen wrote:
> my laptop is thinkpad t61, and wireless card is intel pro/wireless
> 3945abg (according to the lspci output). i have configured my kernel
> as instructed by the handbook, and after compiling and reboot, i can
> see my wlan interface by iwconfig -a
hi,
my laptop is thinkpad t61, and wireless card is intel pro/wireless
3945abg (according to the lspci output). i have configured my kernel
as instructed by the handbook, and after compiling and reboot, i can
see my wlan interface by iwconfig -a, and i modprobe iwl3945. but when
i try iwspy wlan0,
1 - 100 of 331 matches
Mail list logo
