Re: [gentoo-user] Very bad system response

2007-02-23 Thread Robert Szentmihalyi
On Tuesday 06 February 2007 21:29, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > Hi List, Hi Michael, Good to see yoou on the Gentoo list! :-) > I have a very strange thing here. I don't know when this started, but my > feeling is, that it was around kernel 2.6.15 and it's getting worse with > each version. >

Re: [gentoo-user] Very bad system response

2007-02-09 Thread Hemmann, Volker Armin
On Donnerstag, 8. Februar 2007, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > Hi, > > Am Mittwoch, 7. Februar 2007 21:19 schrieb Hemmann, Volker Armin: > > On Mittwoch, 7. Februar 2007, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Am Mittwoch, 7. Februar 2007 12:35 schrieb Benno Schulenberg: > > > > Hemma

Re: [gentoo-user] Very bad system response

2007-02-08 Thread Michael Schreckenbauer
Hi, Am Mittwoch, 7. Februar 2007 21:19 schrieb Hemmann, Volker Armin: > On Mittwoch, 7. Februar 2007, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Am Mittwoch, 7. Februar 2007 12:35 schrieb Benno Schulenberg: > > > Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: > > > > hdparm /dev/hda > > > > > > > > /dev/hda: > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Very bad system response

2007-02-07 Thread Hemmann, Volker Armin
On Mittwoch, 7. Februar 2007, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > Hi, > > Am Mittwoch, 7. Februar 2007 12:35 schrieb Benno Schulenberg: > > Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: > > > hdparm /dev/hda > > > > > > /dev/hda: > > > multcount= 16 (on) > > > IO_support = 1 (32-bit) > > > unmaskirq= 1 (

Re: [gentoo-user] Very bad system response

2007-02-07 Thread Michael Schreckenbauer
Hi, Am Mittwoch, 7. Februar 2007 12:35 schrieb Benno Schulenberg: > Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: > > hdparm /dev/hda > > > > /dev/hda: > > multcount= 16 (on) > > IO_support = 1 (32-bit) > > unmaskirq= 1 (on) > > using_dma= 1 (on) > > keepsettings = 0 (off) > > readonly

Re: [gentoo-user] Very bad system response

2007-02-07 Thread Benno Schulenberg
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: > hdparm /dev/hda > > /dev/hda: > multcount= 16 (on) > IO_support = 1 (32-bit) > unmaskirq= 1 (on) > using_dma= 1 (on) > keepsettings = 0 (off) > readonly = 0 (off) > readahead= 256 (on) > geometry = 16383/255/63, sectors = 2344930

Re: [gentoo-user] Very bad system response

2007-02-07 Thread Michael Schreckenbauer
Hi, Am Mittwoch, 7. Februar 2007 04:49 schrieb Norberto Bensa: > Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: > > On Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > > > I don't think, swap is the cause of this. This system has 1,5GB Ram, > > > swap is nearly never touched :) > > > > swap was only an ex

Re: [gentoo-user] Very bad system response

2007-02-06 Thread Hemmann, Volker Armin
On Mittwoch, 7. Februar 2007, Norberto Bensa wrote: > Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: > > On Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > > > I don't think, swap is the cause of this. This system has 1,5GB Ram, > > > swap is nearly never touched :) > > > > swap was only an example. Thing

Re: [gentoo-user] Very bad system response

2007-02-06 Thread Norberto Bensa
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: > On Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > > I don't think, swap is the cause of this. This system has 1,5GB Ram, swap > > is nearly never touched :) > > swap was only an example. Things that kill performance: big tar, big copy > around, and everyth

Re: [gentoo-user] Very bad system response

2007-02-06 Thread Hemmann, Volker Armin
On Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > Hi, > > Am Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007 schrieb Hemmann, Volker Armin: > > On Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007, Pierre-Yves Rofes wrote: > > > On Tue, February 6, 2007 9:29 pm, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > > > > From time to time my system come

Re: [gentoo-user] Very bad system response

2007-02-06 Thread Michael Schreckenbauer
Hi, Am Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007 schrieb Hemmann, Volker Armin: > On Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007, Pierre-Yves Rofes wrote: > > On Tue, February 6, 2007 9:29 pm, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > > > From time to time my system comes to a complete halt, that means not a > > > single > > > application s

Re: [gentoo-user] Very bad system response

2007-02-06 Thread Michael Schreckenbauer
Hi, Am Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007 schrieb Pierre-Yves Rofes: > On Tue, February 6, 2007 9:29 pm, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > > From time to time my system comes to a complete halt, that means not a > > single > > application shows any response to mouse and/or keyactions, sshing into it > > take

Re: [gentoo-user] Very bad system response

2007-02-06 Thread Hemmann, Volker Armin
On Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007, Pierre-Yves Rofes wrote: > On Tue, February 6, 2007 9:29 pm, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > > Hi List, > > I have a very strange thing here. I don't know when this started, but my > > feeling is, that it was around kernel 2.6.15 and it's getting worse with > > each >

Re: [gentoo-user] Very bad system response

2007-02-06 Thread Pierre-Yves Rofes
On Tue, February 6, 2007 9:29 pm, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > Hi List, > I have a very strange thing here. I don't know when this started, but my > feeling is, that it was around kernel 2.6.15 and it's getting worse with > each > version. > From time to time my system comes to a complete halt,

[gentoo-user] Very bad system response

2007-02-06 Thread Michael Schreckenbauer
Hi List, I have a very strange thing here. I don't know when this started, but my feeling is, that it was around kernel 2.6.15 and it's getting worse with each version. From time to time my system comes to a complete halt, that means not a single application shows any response to mouse and/or ke