>You need three things (my experience) - a patch for portage-2.1_preX/4;
>emerge "confcache" from portage and put FEATURES="...confcache..."
>in /etc/make.conf. This works for me.
>The patch is:confcache-final (IIRC) search mailing-list archives for it.
>Or mail me directly.
>
>
Thanks Rumen - I
On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 16:57 +, Rohit Sharma wrote:
> >Hi,
> >On 'gentoo-portage-dev' ML there are such patch (for portage-2.1_preX)
> >plus in portage there's a package:
> >* dev-util/confcache
> > Available versions: 0.3.3 0.4 0.4.1
> > Installed: 0.4.1
> > Homepage:
>Hi,
>On 'gentoo-portage-dev' ML there are such patch (for portage-2.1_preX)
>plus in portage there's a package:
>* dev-util/confcache
> Available versions: 0.3.3 0.4 0.4.1
> Installed: 0.4.1
> Homepage:http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/confcache
> Description:
On Saturday 18 February 2006 02:38, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] Thought : making the build/emerge faster':
> On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 08:24:17 + Rohit Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> | But since I am a very average
On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 08:24 +, Rohit Sharma wrote:
> Hi there,
> It just occurred to me that the emerges shall be much faster if emerges
> were able to use config.cache set by other applications. The steps
> during ./configure could be saved globally in an /etc/config.cache which
> could be co
On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 08:24:17 + Rohit Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| But since I am a very average guy and there are many people much
| smarter than myself out there in gentoo, I think this idea has been
| discarded long ago since there are incompatibilities amongst various
| software in th
Hi there,
It just occurred to me that the emerges shall be much faster if emerges
were able to use config.cache set by other applications. The steps
during ./configure could be saved globally in an /etc/config.cache which
could be copied over by the current emerge step as it if was its own -
and b
7 matches
Mail list logo
