Re: [gentoo-user] Suspend2-sources-2.6.17 stable.

2006-09-04 Thread Iain Buchanan
On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 14:52 -0700, Richard Fish wrote: > On 9/4/06, Matthew Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I was just wondering, does anyone know why suspend2-sources-2.6.17 not > > stable > > yet? And if anyone is using it, is it stable enough for general use? I've been using it ever sin

Re: [gentoo-user] Suspend2-sources-2.6.17 stable.

2006-09-04 Thread Richard Fish
On 9/4/06, Matthew Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I was just wondering, does anyone know why suspend2-sources-2.6.17 not stable yet? And if anyone is using it, is it stable enough for general use? I'm not actually using it ATM (I need a .18 kernel for suspend-to-ram to work correctly), but

[gentoo-user] Suspend2-sources-2.6.17 stable.

2006-09-04 Thread Matthew Dawson
Hey, I was just wondering, does anyone know why suspend2-sources-2.6.17 not stable yet? And if anyone is using it, is it stable enough for general use? I've looked on google and gentoo bugs, but nothing appears thats useful. Thanks in advance. -- __ Ma