> $ grep '^' allpackages | \
> sed 's/.*]*>\([^<]*\)<\/a>.*/\1/g' | \
> cut -d '-' -f 1 | \
> uniq | wc -l
> 12225
No matter how much I live and code, regular expressions always scare
me like hell
>
> Comments (also about the methodology used to calculate this) are left as
> an exercise f
On Sunday 16 March 2008, 13:22, Emil Beinroth wrote:
> > 27602
>
> That is not really fair, we do not have foo-qt3, foo-qt4,
> foo-mysql, foo-psql .. We have "foo" with useflags.
>
> So either remove the -dev, -qt3, -qt4, virtual packages, [..] from
> that list, or calculate the number of use-flag
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 12:11:21PM +0100, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
> Well, while I love Gentoo and would never change it with anything else,
> Debian is (still) the undiscussed champion in terms of number of
> available packages.
>
> $ wget -nv http://packages.debian.org/stable/allpackages
> 12:32:3
On Sunday 16 March 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> 12618 packages! Didnt realise it was so many. And just the sunrise
> overlay has 943.
>
> That's probably more packages than even Debian has ...
Well, while I love Gentoo and would never change it with anything else,
Debian is (still) the undiscuss
On Saturday 15 March 2008, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
> On Saturday 15 March 2008, Chris Brennan wrote:
> > | Hmmm. There are many thousand ebuilds in the tree. Many more in
> > | 3rd party overlays. Your idea fixes 1 problem in 1 ebuild.
> >
> > Just for the sake of amusment and to give a sense of persp
On Saturday 15 March 2008, Chris Brennan wrote:
> | Hmmm. There are many thousand ebuilds in the tree. Many more in 3rd
> | party overlays. Your idea fixes 1 problem in 1 ebuild.
>
> Just for the sake of amusment and to give a sense of perspective. By
> my count (ls -lshaR /usr/portage | grep ebui
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
| Hmmm. There are many thousand ebuilds in the tree. Many more in 3rd
| party overlays. Your idea fixes 1 problem in 1 ebuild.
Just for the sake of amusment and to give a sense of perspective. By my
count (ls -lshaR /usr/portage | grep ebuild | wc
On Saturday 15 March 2008, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> * Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > A long time ago I read a HUGE thread on b.g.o. about this, the
> > eventual conclusion is that after installation of a lib, a user
> > might well want to link those libs statically and if they are not
* Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A long time ago I read a HUGE thread on b.g.o. about this, the eventual
> conclusion is that after installation of a lib, a user might well want
> to link those libs statically and if they are not there, portage will
> barf big time and has no way to
On Friday 14 March 2008, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> is there a way for telling emerge that it should NOT install
> static (.a) libraries ?
I shan't answer your question as I ca never find the answer myself, but
I keep wanting to do this myself, then I remember why portage
installs .a
Hi folks,
is there a way for telling emerge that it should NOT install
static (.a) libraries ?
thx
--
-
Enrico Weigelt== metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/
---
11 matches
Mail list logo
