On Jan 17, 2008 2:40 AM, kashani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mick wrote:
>
> > I agree that this is not related to the ISP. What you probably need to do
> > is
> > set up RIP2 in your router 1, to be able to recognize other subdomains
> > (192.168.2.XXX). Then it'll process packets coming from
Mick wrote:
I agree that this is not related to the ISP. What you probably need to do is
set up RIP2 in your router 1, to be able to recognize other subdomains
(192.168.2.XXX). Then it'll process packets coming from that subdomain. The
router manual ought to help you out on setting this up.
On Sunday 13 January 2008, Hans-Werner Hilse wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:42:56 +0530
>
> Holla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > One thing, I cannot understand is the difference in traceroute
> > results. What does this say in plain english ? :-)
> >
> > At PC2
> > # traceroute 218.248.2
Hi,
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:42:56 +0530
Holla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One thing, I cannot understand is the difference in traceroute
> results. What does this say in plain english ? :-)
>
> At PC2
> # traceroute 218.248.240.46 (ISP's DNS server)
> traceroute to 218.248.240.46 (218.248.240
I redo the diagram to show the gw info.
Router1: UTSStarCom WA3002G4
Wireless Router with 4 ethernet ports
NAT is enabled (Just a tickbox)
PC1, PC2 : gentoo, 2.6.18.3 kernel
Router2: LinkSys WRT54GL (default firmware)
used as access point
--
Mike Mazur wrote:
Router1 needs a route to point back to PC2 so when traffic bound for it
comes it, it'll know what to do with it.
route add -net 192.168.2.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 192.168.1.23
Also if you want PC2 to access the net, you would need PC1 to be smart
enough to route/NAT packets
user@lists.gentoo.org
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 8:18:37 AM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Routing problem ?
On Jan 11, 2008 10:22 AM, Mike Mazur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Jan 11, 2008 12:14 PM, kashani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 11, 2008 8:09 PM, YoYo Siska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> one other thing, if nat doesn't work, some wireless aps (i'm thinking
> about the 192.168.2.1) need to have correctly set up default gateway
> etc... they sometimes try to be to smart and I had sometimes problems
> when the router wa
On Jan 11, 2008 10:22 AM, Mike Mazur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Jan 11, 2008 12:14 PM, kashani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Holla wrote:
> > > 192.168.1.1
> > > +-+ ++
> > > | |---| Router1 |=ASDL conn
> > > | | +--
On Jan 11, 2008 8:44 AM, kashani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Holla wrote:
> > 192.168.1.1
> > +-+ ++
> > | |---| Router1 |=ASDL conn
> > | | ++
> > | |
> > | |
> > | |
> > | |192.168.1.23 +---+ 192.168.2.43
>
Holla wrote:
> Hi,
> I think I have a routing problem with network
> shown below (hope my ascii art survives)
>
> From PC2, I cannot ping 192.168.1.1 and no internet.
> Also cannot ping ISP's DNS servers. But there is full
> connectivity between PC1 and PC2.
>
> At PC2,
> # traceroute 192.168.1.
Hi,
On Jan 11, 2008 12:14 PM, kashani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Holla wrote:
> > 192.168.1.1
> > +-+ ++
> > | |---| Router1 |=ASDL conn
> > | | ++
> > | |
> > | |
> > | |
> > | |192.168.1.23 +---+ 192.168.2
Holla wrote:
192.168.1.1
+-+ ++
| |---| Router1 |=ASDL conn
| | ++
| |
| |
| |
| |192.168.1.23 +---+ 192.168.2.43
| |--| PC1 |))).
+-+ +---+
Hi,
I think I have a routing problem with network
shown below (hope my ascii art survives)
>From PC2, I cannot ping 192.168.1.1 and no internet.
Also cannot ping ISP's DNS servers. But there is full
connectivity between PC1 and PC2.
At PC2,
# traceroute 192.168.1.1
traceroute to 192.168.1.1 (192
> Am Donnerstag, den 08.09.2005, 11:37 +0200 schrieb Patrick Marquetecken:
>> After spending some hours watching tcpdumps, i saw that the openvpn at
siteB comes with ip form the vpntunnel to the client, setting up a
route on the client solved it all.
>> I tought that i always would use the ip of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Patrick Marquetecken wrote:
> Its Linux to Linux direct without any firewalls.
> the VPN tunnels are now working for more than 3 months, its only that the
> openVPN machines can't connect to other machines then theireselfs.
Have you enabled forwarding
Am Donnerstag, den 08.09.2005, 11:37 +0200 schrieb Patrick Marquetecken:
> After spending some hours watching tcpdumps, i saw that the openvpn at
> siteB comes with ip form the vpntunnel to the client, setting up a route
> on the client solved it all.
> I tought that i always would use the ip of et
After spending some hours watching tcpdumps, i saw that the openvpn at
siteB comes with ip form the vpntunnel to the client, setting up a route
on the client solved it all.
I tought that i always would use the ip of eth0 ?
Patrick
--
Arwen: "Why do you fear the past? You are Isildur's heir, not
> It's rather hard to help you here. You described only the sympthoms but
> didn't provide any basic details like IP-ranges on both sides, routes,
> ovpn config, OpenVPN versions used, etc. etc.
SiteA 10.32.0.0/22
siteB 10.32.16.0/24
connection goes over 10.32.100.0
tunnels ip's are 10.32.101.3 fo
Am Mittwoch, den 07.09.2005, 16:18 +0200 schrieb Patrick Marquetecken:
> Hi,
>
> I have connected two sites with openVPN, this works fine all traffic goes
> trought the tunnels, and i can ping machines from one site to another.
> But, i can't ping a machine from siteA from openVPN from siteB. to m
Hi,
I have connected two sites with openVPN, this works fine all traffic goes
trought the tunnels, and i can ping machines from one site to another.
But, i can't ping a machine from siteA from openVPN from siteB. to make it
compleet bizar the machine on siteA can ping the openVPN on siteB.
If i d
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 20:08:08 -0500
James R Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...
> > duplicate entries for the 10.32.16.0/32 are causing you grief here. It
> > also looks like you have a typo in your second entry (if your above
> > statement was correct) in the third quad of your gateway in t
...
> duplicate entries for the 10.32.16.0/32 are causing you grief here. It
> also looks like you have a typo in your second entry (if your above
> statement was correct) in the third quad of your gateway in this entry:
> 10.32.16.0/32 --> 10.32.100.2.
...
I'm sorry, both of those should read 1
On Friday 10 June 2005 09:19, Patrick Marquetecken wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having a bit trouble to get one computer force to use another route.
>
> this are the commands i'm using to create routes
> route add -net 10.32.16.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gateway 10.32.101.4 dev
> tun1 route add -host 10.32.16
Hi,
I'm having a bit trouble to get one computer force to use another route.
this are the commands i'm using to create routes
route add -net 10.32.16.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gateway 10.32.101.4 dev tun1
route add -host 10.32.16.160 gateway 10.32.101.2 dev tun0
The routes on my gentoo router are
25 matches
Mail list logo
