Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 15:58:06 -0500, Dale wrote:
>
>
>> I have hal, dbus and ivman installed here. They work fine. Since it
>> works, that may be why it is not being updated. Don't fix what
>> works. ;-)
>>
>
> Then why are there 12 op[en bugs on ivman's bug tracke
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 17:56:52 -0500, Dale wrote:
>
>
>> Basically, I just emerged it and restarted KDE. It just worked. I
>> don't recall changing anything as far as configs go.
>>
>
> You don't need ivman with KDE, it has its own device detection
> and automounting.
On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 15:58:06 -0500, Dale wrote:
> I have hal, dbus and ivman installed here. They work fine. Since it
> works, that may be why it is not being updated. Don't fix what
> works. ;-)
Then why are there 12 op[en bugs on ivman's bug tracker?
--
Neil Bothwick
My Go this amn key
On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 17:56:52 -0500, Dale wrote:
> Basically, I just emerged it and restarted KDE. It just worked. I
> don't recall changing anything as far as configs go.
You don't need ivman with KDE, it has its own device detection
and automounting.
--
Neil Bothwick
I wonder how much deep
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Sunday 12 October 2008 00:52:52 Dale wrote:
>
>> I used to use supermount too. Switching for me was pretty easy tho. I
>> had some compatibility issues between versions of hal and ivman once but
>> nothing really major, just annoying as usual.
>>
>> I guess I'm one of
On Sunday 12 October 2008 00:52:52 Dale wrote:
> I used to use supermount too. Switching for me was pretty easy tho. I
> had some compatibility issues between versions of hal and ivman once but
> nothing really major, just annoying as usual.
>
> I guess I'm one of those, if it works, just use it.
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Saturday 11 October 2008 22:58:06 Dale wrote:
>
>
>> I have hal, dbus and ivman installed here. They work fine. Since it
>> works, that may be why it is not being updated. Don't fix what works. ;-)
>>
>
> How have you got it set up and how long has it been that
Alex Schuster wrote:
> Dale writes:
>
>
>> Erik Hahn wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 05:24:27PM -0300, Norberto Bensa wrote:
>>>
Quoting Erik Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Does software rot when it's unmaintained or why is that a problem?
>
>
On Saturday 11 October 2008 23:40:37 Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
> > If there's something better than ivman, or if I really should be
> > configuration HAL directly, then I'm all ears, but I do get the
> > impression that one really should be working with HAL via a front-end for
> > true ease of use
>
Alan McKinnon schrieb am 11.10.2008 23:06:
> On Saturday 11 October 2008 15:18:24 Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
>> Am Samstag, 11. Oktober 2008 13:24:03 schrieb Alan McKinnon:
>>> Is there a replacement for ivman?
>> What exactly do you do with it, which filesystems do you mount with it?
>
> At the moment
Dale writes:
> Erik Hahn wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 05:24:27PM -0300, Norberto Bensa wrote:
> >> Quoting Erik Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>> Does software rot when it's unmaintained or why is that a problem?
> >>
> >> No, but it develops incompatibilities over time...
> >
> > So far, it w
On Saturday 11 October 2008 22:58:06 Dale wrote:
> I have hal, dbus and ivman installed here. They work fine. Since it
> works, that may be why it is not being updated. Don't fix what works. ;-)
How have you got it set up and how long has it been that way? Experienced any
brokenness while it
On Saturday 11 October 2008 14:59:30 Florian Philipp wrote:
> Alan McKinnon schrieb:
> > I'm looking into ivman and pmount for automounting amongst other things
> > while using e17.
> >
> > ivman was last updated Feb 2007 according to the official sourceforge
> > page, and the maintainer is listed
On Saturday 11 October 2008 15:18:24 Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Am Samstag, 11. Oktober 2008 13:24:03 schrieb Alan McKinnon:
> > Is there a replacement for ivman?
>
> What exactly do you do with it, which filesystems do you mount with it?
At the moment mostly just hot-plug stuff on USB with your stan
Erik Hahn wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 05:24:27PM -0300, Norberto Bensa wrote:
>
>> Quoting Erik Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>>
>>> Does software rot when it's unmaintained or why is that a problem?
>>>
>> No, but it develops incompatibilities over time...
>>
>
> So far, it
Norberto Bensa wrote:
> Quoting Erik Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Does software rot when it's unmaintained or why is that a problem?
>
> No, but it develops incompatibilities over time...
>
>
>
> This message was sent using IMP, the
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 05:24:27PM -0300, Norberto Bensa wrote:
> Quoting Erik Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Does software rot when it's unmaintained or why is that a problem?
>
> No, but it develops incompatibilities over time...
So far, it works fine.
--
hackerkey://v4sw5hw2ln3pr5ck0ma2u7LwXm
On Saturday 11 October 2008 20:53:37 Erik Hahn wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 01:24:03PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > I'm looking into ivman and pmount for automounting amongst other things
> > while using e17.
> >
> > ivman was last updated Feb 2007 according to the official sourceforge
> > p
Quoting Erik Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Does software rot when it's unmaintained or why is that a problem?
No, but it develops incompatibilities over time...
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 01:24:03PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> I'm looking into ivman and pmount for automounting amongst other things while
> using e17.
>
> ivman was last updated Feb 2007 according to the official sourceforge page,
> and the maintainer is listed as "". 18 months is a lon
Am Samstag, 11. Oktober 2008 13:24:03 schrieb Alan McKinnon:
> Is there a replacement for ivman?
What exactly do you do with it, which filesystems do you mount with it?
Bye...
Dirk
Alan McKinnon schrieb:
> I'm looking into ivman and pmount for automounting amongst other things while
> using e17.
>
> ivman was last updated Feb 2007 according to the official sourceforge page,
> and the maintainer is listed as "". 18 months is a long time, so this
> package looks like it
I'm looking into ivman and pmount for automounting amongst other things while
using e17.
ivman was last updated Feb 2007 according to the official sourceforge page,
and the maintainer is listed as "". 18 months is a long time, so this
package looks like it's unmaintained.
Is there a replac
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 04:46:17PM +0200, Patrick Marquetecken <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for replacements for:
> mailx/mail; for a machine without a MTA and that can send mail with
> attachments via a smpt server on the network.
Use mailx/mail/nail with msmtp. It will eith
Hi,
I'm looking for replacements for:
mailx/mail; for a machine without a MTA and that can send mail with
attachments via a smpt server on the network.
gaim; for a machine without gnome/kde only fluxbox.
TIA
Patrick
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
25 matches
Mail list logo
