On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:34:42 +0100
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Mittwoch 30 Dezember 2009, Willie Wong wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 02:02:56PM +0100, Penguin Lover Volker
> > Armin Hemmann
> squawked:
> > > you can make it even easier:
> > > create:
> > > /etc/portage/env/PKG_CATEGORY
>
On Mittwoch 30 Dezember 2009, Willie Wong wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 02:02:56PM +0100, Penguin Lover Volker Armin Hemmann
squawked:
> > you can make it even easier:
> > create:
> > /etc/portage/env/PKG_CATEGORY
> > put patch in that directory
> > create file:
> > /etc/portage/PKG_CATEGORY/PK
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 02:02:56PM +0100, Penguin Lover Volker Armin Hemmann
squawked:
> you can make it even easier:
> create:
> /etc/portage/env/PKG_CATEGORY
> put patch in that directory
> create file:
> /etc/portage/PKG_CATEGORY/PKGNAME
> with this:
>
> post_src_prepare() {
> epatch "/
On Mittwoch 30 Dezember 2009, Willie Wong wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 01:17:52PM +0100, Penguin Lover Frank Schwidom
squawked:
> > as i noticed the directory /usr/portage/distfiles holds all installed
> > sources. What i want to do is modifying the code and reinstalling the
> > package. What
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 01:17:52PM +0100, Penguin Lover Frank Schwidom squawked:
> as i noticed the directory /usr/portage/distfiles holds all installed
> sources. What i want to do is modifying the code and reinstalling the
> package. What is the simplest way? Is it possible without modifying the
Hi
as i noticed the directory /usr/portage/distfiles holds all installed
sources. What i want to do is modifying the code and reinstalling the
package. What is the simplest way? Is it possible without modifying the
ebuild? (i dont want to use make and 'make install' directly)
Regards
6 matches
Mail list logo