Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev -> eudev

2016-02-09 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 11:42:55 -0600, Jc García wrote: > >> It is my overwhelming concern. NO systemd. > >> All else is optional. Where's that setting? > > > > The hierarchy is package.use > make.conf > profile > I forgot USE as environment variable, so: > USE(env) > package.use > make.conf > pr

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev -> eudev

2016-02-09 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 17:55:54 + (UTC), James wrote: > > > The hierarchy is package.use > make.conf > profile > > I forgot USE as environment variable, so: > > USE(env) > package.use > make.conf > profile > > Hmmm. Remember I posted that this package.use setting besides > make.conf -system

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev -> eudev

2016-02-09 Thread Mick
On Tuesday 09 Feb 2016 17:55:54 James wrote: > Jc García gmail.com> writes: > > >> What I'm > > >> missing is why the "-systemd" setting in make.conf did not overrule > > >> these missteps? Is there way to set something, anything anywhere > > >> what no packages with require systemd can be insta

[gentoo-user] Re: udev -> eudev

2016-02-09 Thread James
Jc García gmail.com> writes: > >> What I'm > >> missing is why the "-systemd" setting in make.conf did not overrule > >> these missteps? Is there way to set something, anything anywhere > >> what no packages with require systemd can be installed. > > The hierarchy is package.use > make.conf >

[gentoo-user] Re: udev -> eudev

2016-02-09 Thread James
Alan McKinnon gmail.com> writes: > Mike and Neil help me:: rm /etc/portage/package.use/zzz-autounmask and I cleaned out package.unmask from autounmask that inserted systemd flag requirements. by deleting anything that had systemd as a flag setting forgot about those 2. dirty laundry stil

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev -> eudev

2016-02-09 Thread Jc García
2016-02-09 11:39 GMT-06:00 Jc García : > 2016-02-09 11:31 GMT-06:00 James : > >> emerge -uDvtp @world >> shows just a few updates needed but nothing pulling in systemd. What I'm >> missing is why the "-systemd" setting in make.conf did not overrule >> these missteps? Is there way to set somethin

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev -> eudev

2016-02-09 Thread Jc García
2016-02-09 11:31 GMT-06:00 James : > emerge -uDvtp @world > shows just a few updates needed but nothing pulling in systemd. What I'm > missing is why the "-systemd" setting in make.conf did not overrule > these missteps? Is there way to set something, anything anywhere > what no packages with r

[gentoo-user] Re: udev -> eudev

2016-02-09 Thread James
Mick gmail.com> writes: > James, the guidance has already been given. Can you please grep for systemd > ALL of your /etc/portage? There seems to be a USE flag set somewhere and this > is what is pulling in dbus *with* systemd. YES. I forgot Neil had told me to periodically remove this file:

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev -> eudev

2016-02-09 Thread Jc García
2016-02-09 11:28 GMT-06:00 Jc García : > 2016-02-09 11:21 GMT-06:00 James : > >> >> # grep -r systemd /etc/portage > ... >> /etc/portage/package.use/zzz-autounmask:>=sys-fs/udisks-2.1.4 systemd > > look at that file and that line why that was activated. and delete it, and change the useflags for

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev -> eudev

2016-02-09 Thread Jc García
2016-02-09 11:21 GMT-06:00 James : > > # grep -r systemd /etc/portage ... > /etc/portage/package.use/zzz-autounmask:>=sys-fs/udisks-2.1.4 systemd look at that file and that line why that was activated.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev -> eudev

2016-02-09 Thread Jc García
2016-02-09 11:17 GMT-06:00 James : > Granted. But the point is it's my desktop. udisk cannot be removed without > changing the entire desktop. That a bit extreme. But if there is a cool, > minimialistic desktop (lxqt?) that avoids all derivative dependencies > on systemd && company, then that is v

[gentoo-user] Re: udev -> eudev

2016-02-09 Thread James
Neil Bothwick digimed.co.uk> writes: > > emerge -uDtvp world reveals the same trouble:: > > > > [ebuild R] sys-apps/dbus-1.8.16::gentoo USE="X systemd* -debug > > -doc (-selinux) -static-libs {-test}" ABI_X86="32 (64) (-x32)" 0 KiB > It also reveals the cause, not that you have us

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev -> eudev

2016-02-09 Thread Mick
On Tuesday 09 Feb 2016 16:47:28 James wrote: > Neil Bothwick digimed.co.uk> writes: > > THIS is where you should be using -t, in the command that generates the > > output you are trying to explain. > > emerge -uDvtp @world > > These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order: > > C

[gentoo-user] Re: udev -> eudev

2016-02-09 Thread James
Jc García gmail.com> writes: > > lxde-meta has no flag options to set, so this looks fixed. > > I guess I could change to another minimal desktop? > > > > I've been running this version of lxde-meta for about a year now > > and it has not been a problem before, at all, so I do not think > > this

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev -> eudev

2016-02-09 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 16:27:34 + (UTC), James wrote: > Guidance? What's the replacement for udev? YES I am confounded. There isn't one really, just three different implementations. systemd: with udev included udev:standalone taken from systemd eudev: a fork of udev Oops, before walt kic

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev -> eudev

2016-02-09 Thread Jc García
2016-02-09 10:50 GMT-06:00 James : > Jc García gmail.com> writes: > > >> It seems to me udisks is the package with the systemd USE flag >> activated that might be causing all the trouble, maybe automatically >> added by an autounmask by error, I would use grep to check the package >> use file(s),

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev -> eudev

2016-02-09 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 16:40:47 + (UTC), James wrote: > emerge -uDtvp @world reveals the same trouble:: > > [ebuild R] sys-apps/dbus-1.8.16::gentoo USE="X systemd* -debug > -doc (-selinux) -static-libs {-test}" ABI_X86="32 (64) (-x32)" 0 KiB > [ebuild N#]sys-apps/systemd-226-r

[gentoo-user] Re: udev -> eudev

2016-02-09 Thread James
Jc García gmail.com> writes: > It seems to me udisks is the package with the systemd USE flag > activated that might be causing all the trouble, maybe automatically > added by an autounmask by error, I would use grep to check the package > use file(s), to know wich useflags might have been activ

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev -> eudev

2016-02-09 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 09/02/2016 18:13, James wrote: > Neil Bothwick digimed.co.uk> writes: > > >>> sys-apps/systemd is not even installed, but it shows up as a blocker? >>> gentoo-systemd-integration is not installed, but it's a blocker. > >> It's showing up because it is blocking your update, which means someth

[gentoo-user] Re: udev -> eudev

2016-02-09 Thread James
Neil Bothwick digimed.co.uk> writes: > THIS is where you should be using -t, in the command that generates the > output you are trying to explain. emerge -uDvtp @world These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order: Calculating dependencies... done! [nomerge ] sci-vis

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev -> eudev

2016-02-09 Thread Jc García
2016-02-09 10:27 GMT-06:00 James : > James tampabay.rr.com> writes: > > >> > 2) Use --tree to see exactly what is pulling in the blockers, and why, >> > then deal with that. > > So I removed udisks gputils sdcc gimp > > emerge -uvtp world > > ebuild U ~] dev-vcs/git-2.7.1::gentoo > > yip

[gentoo-user] Re: udev -> eudev

2016-02-09 Thread James
Neil Bothwick digimed.co.uk> writes: > > On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 16:13:10 + (UTC), James wrote: > > > > > sys-apps/systemd is not even installed, but it shows up as a > > > > blocker? gentoo-systemd-integration is not installed, but it's a > > > > blocker. > > > > > It's showing up because it

[gentoo-user] Re: udev -> eudev

2016-02-09 Thread James
James tampabay.rr.com> writes: > > 2) Use --tree to see exactly what is pulling in the blockers, and why, > > then deal with that. So I removed udisks gputils sdcc gimp emerge -uvtp world ebuild U ~] dev-vcs/git-2.7.1::gentoo yippee ? emerge -uDNvtp world Conflict: 3 blocks

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev -> eudev

2016-02-09 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 16:13:10 + (UTC), James wrote: > > > sys-apps/systemd is not even installed, but it shows up as a > > > blocker? gentoo-systemd-integration is not installed, but it's a > > > blocker. > > > It's showing up because it is blocking your update, which means > > something you

[gentoo-user] Re: udev -> eudev

2016-02-09 Thread James
Neil Bothwick digimed.co.uk> writes: > > sys-apps/systemd is not even installed, but it shows up as a blocker? > > gentoo-systemd-integration is not installed, but it's a blocker. > It's showing up because it is blocking your update, which means something > you are installing as part of that up

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev -> eudev

2016-02-09 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 13:30:04 + (UTC), James wrote: > sys-apps/systemd is not even installed, but it shows up as a blocker? > gentoo-systemd-integration is not installed, but it's a blocker. It's showing up because it is blocking your update, which means something you are installing as part of

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev -> eudev

2016-02-09 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 09/02/2016 16:42, James wrote: > James tampabay.rr.com> writes: > > > Boy this just keeps getting stranger and stranger. > So I:: > > emerge -C sys-fs/udev > emerge eudev > > no problems, > > then in /etc/portage/package.mask I masked off:: > > sys-apps/systemd > sys-apps/gentoo-systemd-

[gentoo-user] Re: udev -> eudev

2016-02-09 Thread James
James tampabay.rr.com> writes: Boy this just keeps getting stranger and stranger. So I:: emerge -C sys-fs/udev emerge eudev no problems, then in /etc/portage/package.mask I masked off:: sys-apps/systemd sys-apps/gentoo-systemd-integration On a normal, routine update, I have about 6 packag

[gentoo-user] Re: udev -> eudev

2016-02-09 Thread James
Jc García gmail.com> writes: > > [blocks B ] sys-fs/eudev ("sys-fs/eudev" is blocking > > sys-apps/gentoo-systemd-integration-4, sys-apps/systemd-226-r2) > > [blocks B ] sys-apps/gentoo-systemd-integration > > ("sys-apps/gentoo-systemd-integration" is blocking sys-fs/udev-225, > > sys-