Re: [gentoo-user] Re: openrc and /etc/modprobe.d/*

2011-05-31 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:33 on Tuesday 31 May 2011, Harry Putnam did opine thusly: > Alan McKinnon writes: > >> modules=fuse > >> > >> Which appears to be the proper syntax judging from the comments in > >> the stub file provided (/etc/conf.d/modules). > >> > >> But `fuse' never ge

[gentoo-user] Re: openrc and /etc/modprobe.d/*

2011-05-30 Thread Harry Putnam
Alan McKinnon writes: >> modules=fuse >> >> Which appears to be the proper syntax judging from the comments in >> the stub file provided (/etc/conf.d/modules). >> >> But `fuse' never gets auto loaded. There must be something more or >> different it needs. > > > Your syntax is correct. I susp

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: openrc and /etc/modprobe.d/*

2011-05-29 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:38 on Monday 30 May 2011, Harry Putnam did opine thusly: > Nikos Chantziaras writes: > > If you have modules you wish to get loaded automatically on boot, > > only then put entries for them in /etc/conf.d/modules. > > Sorry to butt in and change the subject sl

[gentoo-user] Re: openrc and /etc/modprobe.d/*

2011-05-29 Thread Harry Putnam
Nikos Chantziaras writes: > If you have modules you wish to get loaded automatically on boot, > only then put entries for them in /etc/conf.d/modules. Sorry to butt in and change the subject slightly: Do you happen to know the exact syntax for that kind of rule or whatever it's called. I've be

[gentoo-user] Re: openrc and /etc/modprobe.d/*

2011-05-26 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 05/26/2011 10:36 PM, Mick wrote: As I was booting an old laptop I noticed a message coming up telling me that the /etc/modprobe.d/irda file will be done away with in future versions. Are these files now deprecated? Are we meant to fit everything in /etc/conf.d/modules as per the OpenRC migra