Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-24 Thread Walter Dnes
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 08:36:56AM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote > On Tuesday 24 April 2012 02:41:49 Walter Dnes wrote: > > > You seem to be sending multipart/alternative. I didn't even notice > > that there was any HTML. Here is what mutt shows when I ask it to > > view attachments... > > I've

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-24 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Tuesday 24 April 2012 14:03:38 Allan Gottlieb wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24 2012, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > Would someone please confirm whether this has had the desired > > effect? Many thanks. > > Success. Just text. > thanks, > allan Thank you both. I dare say we're all glad that's finally fixed

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-24 Thread Allan Gottlieb
On Tue, Apr 24 2012, Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Tuesday 24 April 2012 02:41:49 Walter Dnes wrote: > >> You seem to be sending multipart/alternative. I didn't even notice >> that there was any HTML. Here is what mutt shows when I ask it to >> view attachments... > > I've finally found what I th

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-24 Thread Michael Mol
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 3:36 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Tuesday 24 April 2012 02:41:49 Walter Dnes wrote: > >>   You seem to be sending multipart/alternative.  I didn't even notice >> that there was any HTML.  Here is what mutt shows when I ask it to >> view attachments... > > I've finally fou

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-24 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 01:19:12 +0100, David W Noon wrote: > > > Claws-mail also has that option, but it applies globally, and there > > > are some email messages I receive (mostly marketing related) where > > > HTML gives added value. Consequently, I would have to keep > > > reconfiguring Claws to

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-24 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Tuesday 24 April 2012 02:41:49 Walter Dnes wrote: > You seem to be sending multipart/alternative. I didn't even notice > that there was any HTML. Here is what mutt shows when I ask it to > view attachments... I've finally found what I think was the culprit - a menu option hidden in the co

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-23 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Tuesday 24 April 2012 02:41:49 Walter Dnes wrote: > You seem to be sending multipart/alternative. I didn't even notice > that there was any HTML. Here is what mutt shows when I ask it to > view attachments... > > -- Mutt: Attachments > I 1 [multipa/alternativ, >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-23 Thread Walter Dnes
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 09:56:13PM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote > Is this better? I hate HTML in e-mail and I've never set any kmail > option to use it; however I did find "html-markup=true" in kmailrc and > set it to false. > > Actually, that kmailrc setting sounds familiar from the last time

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-23 Thread David W Noon
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 00:14:46 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote about Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered: > On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 20:18:27 +0100, David W Noon wrote: > > > Claws-mail also has that option, but it applies globally, and there > > are some email messages

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-23 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 20:18:27 +0100, David W Noon wrote: > Claws-mail also has that option, but it applies globally, and there are > some email messages I receive (mostly marketing related) where HTML > gives added value. Consequently, I would have to keep reconfiguring > Claws to exclude/permit H

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-23 Thread Michael Mol
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Monday 23 April 2012 19:34:58 David W Noon wrote: > >> On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 18:50:44 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote about Re: > >> [gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered: > >> > >> [snip]

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-23 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Monday 23 April 2012 19:34:58 David W Noon wrote: > On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 18:50:44 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote about Re: > [gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered: > > [snip] > > > So I removed linux-firmware, rebooted and got kmail back. > > We all noticed th

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-23 Thread David W Noon
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 21:53:36 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote about [gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered: > On 23/04/12 21:34, David W Noon wrote: [snip] > > Any chance of you reconfiguring KMail not to send HTML messages? > > Please ... pretty please ... :-) > > A

[gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-23 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 23/04/12 21:34, David W Noon wrote: On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 18:50:44 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote about Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered: [snip] So I removed linux-firmware, rebooted and got kmail back. We all noticed that you are using KMail once more, because you are sending

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-23 Thread David W Noon
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 18:50:44 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote about Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered: [snip] > So I removed linux-firmware, rebooted and got kmail back. We all noticed that you are using KMail once more, because you are sending HTML messages with a huge font and b

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-23 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Saturday 21 April 2012 16:21:31 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > Do a: > >dmesg | grep -i firmware > > and check for firmware loading errors. I have what seems to be the same network hardware, so I did what you said and duly found an error. I hadn't had any obvious network performance proble

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-21 Thread Dale
Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 21/04/12 18:55, Dale wrote: >> Nikos Chantziaras wrote: >>> [...] >>> Also, make sure to emerge sys-kernel/linux-firmware. Without it, >>> RTL8111/8168B NICs will produce random connectivity hang-ups after a few >>> hours; they need firmware that was previously part

[gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-21 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 21/04/12 18:55, Dale wrote: Nikos Chantziaras wrote: [...] Also, make sure to emerge sys-kernel/linux-firmware. Without it, RTL8111/8168B NICs will produce random connectivity hang-ups after a few hours; they need firmware that was previously part of the kernel itself but has now been split

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-21 Thread Dale
Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 21/04/12 17:25, Philip Webb wrote: >> 120421 Dale wrote: >>> Philip Webb wrote: You actually have to remove the offensive file from the dir, not simply rename it to 'xx70xx...' ! >>> That's the same way files in /etc/portage/ works too. >>> I do wish we could

[gentoo-user] Re: new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-21 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 21/04/12 17:25, Philip Webb wrote: 120421 Dale wrote: Philip Webb wrote: You actually have to remove the offensive file from the dir, not simply rename it to 'xx70xx...' ! That's the same way files in /etc/portage/ works too. I do wish we could put a # on the front to make it ignore files.