> OK. I just thought there may be a open source option that is better or at
> least has less security problems.
There are some, lightspark and gnash are in portage. I've never tried
any of them...
Adam Carter wrote:
Now I got to ask a question. Does this replace the other flash player
thingy that has so many security holes?
No, java != flash, different plugin. Try about:plugins in the URL box
so see what you have.
OK. I just thought there may be a open source option that is
> Now I got to ask a question. Does this replace the other flash player
> thingy that has so many security holes?
No, java != flash, different plugin. Try about:plugins in the URL box
so see what you have.
walt wrote:
On 07/25/2011 08:54 PM, Grant wrote:
BTW, can anyone tell me why I'm using icedtea6-bin instead of icedtea?
When I first installed icedtea-bin there was no icedtea package, so I
tried to compile it myself using online instructions and gave up in
frustration.
I'm glad you
On 07/25/2011 08:54 PM, Grant wrote:
> BTW, can anyone tell me why I'm using icedtea6-bin instead of icedtea?
When I first installed icedtea-bin there was no icedtea package, so I
tried to compile it myself using online instructions and gave up in
frustration.
I'm glad you asked, because now I'l
On 07/22/2011 11:13 AM, Grant wrote:
> Wouldn't a sufficiently large swap (100GB for example) completely
> prevent out of memory conditions and the oom-killer?
There's always someone who can pull a corner case out of his hat :)
I can't remember the details now, but there was a piece of code in
t
6 matches
Mail list logo
