On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 06:40 +0100, Francesco Talamona wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 October 2012, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> > Any idea how I can get the mount command to recognise exfat? It
> > works as root but not via fstab for users.
> >
> > bunyip ~ # mount /dev/sdc1 /mnt/tmp
> > mount: unknown filesy
On Tuesday 30 October 2012, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> Any idea how I can get the mount command to recognise exfat? It
> works as root but not via fstab for users.
>
> bunyip ~ # mount /dev/sdc1 /mnt/tmp
> mount: unknown filesystem type 'exfat'
> bunyip ~ # mount.exfat /dev/sdc1 /mnt/tmp
> FUSE exfa
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 02:35:44 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Anyway, you don't need to add something to remind you
> of the partition's position; /etc/mtab will use regular device names,
> so you can see what's going on with 'cat /etc/mtab' or simply 'mount'
> without parameters.
cfdisk also
Mick wrote:
On Sunday 20 July 2008, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
The labels are part of the file system; they're always there. For
example, when booting the 2007.0 LiveDVD (which uses the legacy drivers,
meaning /dev/hd* instead of /dev/sd*) the labels are there and I can
mount /dev/disk/by-label/G
Dale wrote:
Dale wrote:
True but I have trouble remembering which partition is home and which
is portage, until I mount them anyway. It's obvious then.
I guess according to another reply that I will have to use something
else for resierfs. I guess it can't hurt to much. Worst thing is to
ha
Dale wrote:
True but I have trouble remembering which partition is home and which
is portage, until I mount them anyway. It's obvious then.
I guess according to another reply that I will have to use something
else for resierfs. I guess it can't hurt to much. Worst thing is to
have to boot
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Dale wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Dale wrote:
[...]
Question, if I were to label mine and then boot from a Gentoo or
any other bootable CD, would those labels still be there?
The labels are part of the file system; they're always there. For
example, when bootin
Dale wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Dale wrote:
[...]
Question, if I were to label mine and then boot from a Gentoo or any
other bootable CD, would those labels still be there?
The labels are part of the file system; they're always there. For
example, when booting the 2007.0 LiveDVD (whic
On Sunday 20 July 2008, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Dale wrote:
> > Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> >> Mick wrote:
> >>> [...]
> >>> What would be the recommended way of upgrading from the /dev/hd to
> >>> /dev/sd then? I have held back doing this because I didn't have the
> >>> time to mess about with
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 12:29:19AM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
The CD/DVD-ROM can show up as /dev/sd* even with the old legacy drivers
if you have enable "SCSI Emulation" for it.
In any event, try to build a new kernel using the new drivers. The old
legacy driver yo
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Dale wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Mick wrote:
[...]
What would be the recommended way of upgrading from the /dev/hd to
/dev/sd then? I have held back doing this because I didn't have
the time to mess about with it. If I were to configure a new
kernel without le
Dale wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Mick wrote:
[...]
What would be the recommended way of upgrading from the /dev/hd to
/dev/sd then? I have held back doing this because I didn't have the
time to mess about with it. If I were to configure a new kernel
without legacy ATA drivers, how woul
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Mick wrote:
[...]
What would be the recommended way of upgrading from the /dev/hd to
/dev/sd then? I have held back doing this because I didn't have the
time to mess about with it. If I were to configure a new kernel
without legacy ATA drivers, how would I know what
Mick wrote:
[...]
What would be the recommended way of upgrading from the /dev/hd to /dev/sd
then? I have held back doing this because I didn't have the time to mess
about with it. If I were to configure a new kernel without legacy ATA
drivers, how would I know what my devices will be seen a
Hi, Mick,
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 06:22:23PM +0100, Mick wrote:
> On Sunday 20 July 2008, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > So the kernel guys have decided that nobody would ever want more than 15
> > partitions on a drive.
> From memory I recall that this has always been the limit for SATA/SCSI
> dri
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 15:05:10 +, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> So the kernel guys have decided that nobody would ever want more than 15
> partitions on a drive. It's a bit like the old MS-DOS restriction to
> 512 MB all over again. Hey, guys, hard drives nowadays are like 200
> gig, not 512meg. Wh
On Sunday 20 July 2008, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> So the kernel guys have decided that nobody would ever want more than 15
> partitions on a drive.
From memory I recall that this has always been the limit for SATA/SCSI drives.
For ATA drives I think it is 63?
Not sure if this is a Linux OS ker
Hi, Nikos!
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 12:29:19AM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> >>The default in new kernels is to only use /dev/sd*.
> >I'm totally confused. Doesn't "sd*" mean "SCSI disk drive"? When I was
> >installing Gentoo from the CD, I had to mount my main hard d
On Saturday 19 July 2008, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> >> The default in new kernels is to only use /dev/sd*.
> >
> > I'm totally confused. Doesn't "sd*" mean "SCSI disk drive"? When I was
> > installing Gentoo from the CD, I had to mount my main hard drive as
> > /dev/sdb5.
Alan Mackenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There's /dev/sda and /dev/sda1, and no other /dev/sd*. That's where my
> UBS stick gets mounted.
What about any /dev/sr*?
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
The default in new kernels is to only use /dev/sd*.
I'm totally confused. Doesn't "sd*" mean "SCSI disk drive"? When I was
installing Gentoo from the CD, I had to mount my main hard drive as
/dev/sdb5. When I built my own kernel, it needed /dev/hdh5.
This seems crazy.
Hi, Miernik,
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 09:13:09PM +0200, Miernik wrote:
> Alan Mackenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > # mknod /dev/hdc b 22 0
> > This didn't help one iota. I had a look at dmesg, but there was no
> > mention of hdc in it. (It did mention hdg, hdh, where my main hard
> > drives
Hi, Nikos,
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 10:06:15PM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> >However, I can't access my DVD drives. I know at least one of them
> >works, because I installed Gentoo from it.
> >When I do
> > mount -tiso9660 /dev/hdc /cdrom
> >, it comes back with
Alan Mackenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # mknod /dev/hdc b 22 0
>
> This didn't help one iota. I had a look at dmesg, but there was no
> mention of hdc in it. (It did mention hdg, hdh, where my main hard
> drives are (don't ask!)).
Maybe there was some /dev/sda /dev/sdb or something similar
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
Hi, Gentoo?
I've a newly installed system, now working with my own special
optimiesed keyboard layout. :-)
However, I can't access my DVD drives. I know at least one of them
works, because I installed Gentoo from it.
When I do
mount -tiso9660 /dev/hdc /cdrom
, it c
On 2008-03-17, Rik Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> According to the docs at
>> http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Setup_Samba#Using_CIFS,
>> the following command should work:
>>
>> mount -t cifs /// / \
>> -o
>> "user
On Tuesday 27 November 2007, Joost Roeleveld wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 07:53:40 +0100, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> >> There is no need to do so. However, a fuse based filesystem for mounting
> >> audio CDs exists, see http://castet.matthieu.free.fr/cddfs/.
> >
> > Oh, thank you all for your input
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 07:53:40 +0100, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
>
>
>> There is no need to do so. However, a fuse based filesystem for mounting
>> audio CDs exists, see http://castet.matthieu.free.fr/cddfs/.
>
> Oh, thank you all for your input -- I've been a bit obsessed with rails
> and let this go t
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 07:53:40 +0100, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> There is no need to do so. However, a fuse based filesystem for mounting
> audio CDs exists, see http://castet.matthieu.free.fr/cddfs/.
Oh, thank you all for your input -- I've been a bit obsessed with rails
and let this go to the back
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 09:11:06 +
Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 08:15:48 + (UTC), Thufir wrote:
>
> > In this case, the discs are fine, as are the drives. The drives
> > mount fine in Fedora and read these particular discs fine (music
> > CD's).
>
> You don
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 08:15:48 + (UTC), Thufir wrote:
> In this case, the discs are fine, as are the drives. The drives mount
> fine in Fedora and read these particular discs fine (music CD's).
You don't mount audio CDs.
--
Neil Bothwick
Procrastinate now!
signature.asc
Description: PGP
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 07:36:44 +0100, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> I also found (with Google) one forum posting where it was stated that
> the cause was a bad, self-burned disk in the drive. When the poster
> changed the disk, the problem disapeared.
In this case, the discs are fine, as are the drives.
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 15:20:43 +, Stroller wrote:
> A Google seems to suggest that "mount: No buffer space available" is
> commonly returned when the device is already mounted.
Oh, I wasn't finding that or didn't know how to interpret it.
> The manpage for `mount` indicates that `mount -a` wil
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yikes ... looks like my literacy level is greviously low..
> First, sorry this got somewhat disjointed.
>
> I think you may have already ansered what I wanted to know but for the
> sake of clarity.
>
> The `puppy' live cd described in my quotation says it can create a
>
Harry Putnam wrote:
Harry Putnam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alexander, Do you know if the system described above is what ntfs-g3
does too?
One could never determine something that basic from the man page
supplied with it. After reading it, I still know nothing about how it
works.
With a d
Harry Putnam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Alexander, Do you know if the system described above is what ntfs-g3
> does too?
One could never determine something that basic from the man page
supplied with it. After reading it, I still know nothing about how it
works.
With a disk mounted under th
Gian Domeni Calgeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Or does anyone know if any of the Live CDs `knoppix' style have this
>> > tool on board?
>>
>> ntfs3g is *VERY* *VERY* new. I don't think that a "knoppix style"
>> CD already has it. But I *bet*, that they'll have it quite soon.
>
> Hi
>
> On
>
> > Or does anyone know if any of the Live CDs `knoppix' style have this
> > tool on board?
>
> ntfs3g is *VERY* *VERY* new. I don't think that a "knoppix style"
> CD already has it. But I *bet*, that they'll have it quite soon.
Hi
On
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=292336
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Peter Ruskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Yes. It's called ntfs3g. There's an ebuild for it.
Thanks for that tip, Alexander - it works well here.
Peter or Alexander, can you give a few details of what you are able to
do with it?
I don't use it - I just read about
Peter Ruskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Yes. It's called ntfs3g. There's an ebuild for it.
>>
> Thanks for that tip, Alexander - it works well here.
Peter or Alexander, can you give a few details of what you are able to
do with it?
Can I put that on a live CD and boot with the cd, then be ab
> > Hello, I'm trying to upgrade my server to the latest hardened-sources
> > kernel. I'm trying to mount my /dev/hda1 partition to /boot but I'm
> > getting the error:
> >
> > mount: unknown filesystem type 'ext2'
> >
> > It's true that I don't have ext2 support compiled into my kernel, but I
> >
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:15:14 -0800, Grant wrote:
> Hello, I'm trying to upgrade my server to the latest hardened-sources
> kernel. I'm trying to mount my /dev/hda1 partition to /boot but I'm
> getting the error:
>
> mount: unknown filesystem type 'ext2'
>
> It's true that I don't have ext2 supp
Harry Putnam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Still I can't get to those shares without a reboot of gentoo it seems.
> That reboot must clear something that probably can be cleared manually
> without a reboot
Even the above referenced reboot was frozen at the point of umounting
local fs. Requir
Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 06:02:07 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> So far I've used the old MS refrain `reboot, reboot, and reboot' to
>> clear up the mounts but I'm sure there is some better way or maybe a
>> way to prevent this from the start.
>
> umount -l
On 10/15/05, Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I found HFS & HFSPLUS file system support in the kernel so I'mbuilding that now.
Actually OS X disks are formated HFS+ so no need to build HFS support.
There are also hfsutils and hfsplusutils but the later seems to bemasked in a way that I don't
I found HFS & HFSPLUS file system support in the kernel so I'm
building that now.
There are also hfsutils and hfsplusutils but the later seems to be
masked in a way that I don't know how to get around:
lightning linux # emerge -pv hfsutils hfsplusutils
These are the packages that I would merge,
On Thursday 14 April 2005 22:12, Al Bayrouni wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I want to mount an iso file ont /mnt/iso directorie.
> I have this message when I run this command:
>
>
> mount /mnt/packages-x86-2005.0.iso /mnt/iso -o loop=/dev/loop0,
>
> /dev/loop0: no such file or directorie
mount -o loop /
47 matches
Mail list logo
