Re: [gentoo-user] Re: mesa build failure

2017-11-27 Thread Walter Dnes
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 10:52:05PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote > On 27/11/2017 21:59, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > > On 2017-11-27 21:07, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > > >> mesa has 18 versions in-tree and mesa-17.1.8 is the second oldest. Any > >> special reason you are stuck so far back? A package.mask you

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: mesa build failure

2017-11-27 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 27/11/2017 21:59, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > On 2017-11-27 21:07, Alan McKinnon wrote: > >> mesa has 18 versions in-tree and mesa-17.1.8 is the second oldest. Any >> special reason you are stuck so far back? A package.mask you no longr >> actually need maybe? > > All the later ones are ~arch ? >

[gentoo-user] Re: mesa build failure

2017-11-27 Thread Ian Zimmerman
On 2017-11-27 21:07, Alan McKinnon wrote: > mesa has 18 versions in-tree and mesa-17.1.8 is the second oldest. Any > special reason you are stuck so far back? A package.mask you no longr > actually need maybe? All the later ones are ~arch ? -- Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: mesa build failure

2009-06-27 Thread Mark Knecht
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 06/28/2009 01:30 AM, Mark Knecht wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Nikos Chantziaras >>  wrote: >>> >>> On 06/28/2009 12:20 AM, Mark Knecht wrote: As far as the bug report went it just didn't click for me. Dis

[gentoo-user] Re: mesa build failure

2009-06-27 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 06/28/2009 01:30 AM, Mark Knecht wrote: On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 06/28/2009 12:20 AM, Mark Knecht wrote: As far as the bug report went it just didn't click for me. Disappointing that after something like 10 months no one has fixed the ebuild. The latter

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: mesa build failure

2009-06-27 Thread Mark Knecht
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 06/28/2009 12:20 AM, Mark Knecht wrote: >> >> As far as the bug report went it just didn't click for me. >> Disappointing that after something like 10 months no one has fixed the >> ebuild. > > The latter ebuilds are fixed.  They're sti

[gentoo-user] Re: mesa build failure

2009-06-27 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 06/28/2009 12:20 AM, Mark Knecht wrote: As far as the bug report went it just didn't click for me. Disappointing that after something like 10 months no one has fixed the ebuild. The latter ebuilds are fixed. They're still ~arch, but I recommend you use them because the latter driver versio