On Sun, Mar 10 2019, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 10/03/2019 00:24, allan gottlieb wrote:
>>The following REQUIRED_USE flag constraints are unsatisfied:
>> inspector? ( icu )
>>
>>The above constraints are a subset of the following complete expression:
>> python_targets_python2_
On 10/03/2019 00:24, allan gottlieb wrote:
The following REQUIRED_USE flag constraints are unsatisfied:
inspector? ( icu )
The above constraints are a subset of the following complete expression:
python_targets_python2_7 inspector? ( icu ssl ) npm? ( ssl )
This seems more seriou
On 16/11/2017 03:49, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2017-11-15 18:40, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
>> Why is it trying to install the version? Is that unmasked?
>>
>> Are you running stable or testing?
>>
>> What does "grep -r glibc /etc/portage" say?
>>
>> I don't think you posted the command that star
On 11/15 05:49, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2017-11-15 18:40, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
> > Why is it trying to install the version? Is that unmasked?
> >
> > Are you running stable or testing?
> >
> > What does "grep -r glibc /etc/portage" say?
> >
> > I don't think you posted the command that
On 2017-11-15 18:40, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> Why is it trying to install the version? Is that unmasked?
>
> Are you running stable or testing?
>
> What does "grep -r glibc /etc/portage" say?
>
> I don't think you posted the command that started all of this?
For some reason, these horrible
On 07/09/2016 18:39, Grant wrote:
>> Hi, my site is being ravaged by an IP but dropping the IP via
>> shorewall is seeming to have no effect. I'm using his IP from nginx
>> logs. IP blocking in shorewall has always worked before. What could
>> be happening?
>
>
> I'm
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Grant wrote:
>
> I said I was under attack but it was really just an unthrottled and
> very greedy bot. fail2ban would have gotten him. But while we're on
> the subject, how would you recommend thwarting a DDoS attack against a
> dedicated server in a hosted envi
> Hi, my site is being ravaged by an IP but dropping the IP via
> shorewall is seeming to have no effect. I'm using his IP from nginx
> logs. IP blocking in shorewall has always worked before. What could
> be happening?
I'm blocking like this with the firewall runn
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Grant wrote:
Hi, my site is being ravaged by an IP but dropping the IP via
shorewall is seeming to have no effect. I'm using his IP from nginx
logs. IP blocking in shorewall has always worked before. What could
be happening?
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm bl
>>> Hi, my site is being ravaged by an IP but dropping the IP via
>>> shorewall is seeming to have no effect. I'm using his IP from nginx
>>> logs. IP blocking in shorewall has always worked before. What could
>>> be happening?
>>
>>
>> I'm blocking like this with the firewall running on the web
On September 6, 2016 10:57:54 PM GMT+02:00, Grant wrote:
>> Hi, my site is being ravaged by an IP but dropping the IP via
>> shorewall is seeming to have no effect. I'm using his IP from nginx
>> logs. IP blocking in shorewall has always worked before. What could
>> be happening?
>
>
>I'm block
On 06/09/2016 22:57, Grant wrote:
>> Hi, my site is being ravaged by an IP but dropping the IP via
>> shorewall is seeming to have no effect. I'm using his IP from nginx
>> logs. IP blocking in shorewall has always worked before. What could
>> be happening?
>
>
> I'm blocking like this with th
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 01:57:54PM -0700, Grant wrote:
> > Hi, my site is being ravaged by an IP but dropping the IP via
> > shorewall is seeming to have no effect. I'm using his IP from nginx
> > logs.
What you really need is to set up net-anlyzer/fail2ban and not do this
kind of stuff manually.
> Hi, my site is being ravaged by an IP but dropping the IP via
> shorewall is seeming to have no effect. I'm using his IP from nginx
> logs. IP blocking in shorewall has always worked before. What could
> be happening?
I'm blocking like this with the firewall running on the web server:
/etc/
On 06/27/2014 01:59 AM, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am in a very strange situation where I cannot emerge anything any more.
> Since it occurs on two different machines it won't be a hardware problem.
>
> When I try to emerge a package, say portage, it builds it just fine and
> starts to in
On Monday 21 February 2011 04:07:20 Valmor de Almeida wrote:
> otherwise my keyboard keybindings do not work. I have also tried the
> pointer InputClass outside the xorg.conf file, that is, inside the
> xorg.conf.d/ directory. As long as the 10-synaptics.conf file is read
> first, the keyboard con
On 02/20/2011 10:03 AM, Mick wrote:
[snip]
>
> Have you had a look at:
>
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/xorg-server-1.8-upgrade-guide.xml
Yes. Got some info there.
>
> Also, have a read of the InputClass section in man xorg.conf and the files in
> /usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d/.
On 02/20/2011 12:53 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 14:48:17 -0500, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the help. This was less painful than I thought. However it
>> exposed a internet connection problem. I am using wicd for wireless and
>> wired internet config. This laptop ha
On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 14:48:17 -0500, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
> Thanks for the help. This was less painful than I thought. However it
> exposed a internet connection problem. I am using wicd for wireless and
> wired internet config. This laptop happened to be in a place where no
> wired internet is
On Sunday 20 February 2011 00:25:24 Valmor de Almeida wrote:
> On 02/19/2011 06:59 PM, Mick wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > On two laptops of mine evdev causes untold confusion with the touchpad
> > and second language selection for the keyboard. I *have* to use the
> > synaptics and keyboard input drivers
On 02/19/2011 06:59 PM, Mick wrote:
[snip]
>
> On two laptops of mine evdev causes untold confusion with the touchpad and
> second language selection for the keyboard. I *have* to use the synaptics
> and
> keyboard input drivers. I'm also using mouse (because it doesn't hurt I
> guess).
>
>
On Saturday 19 February 2011 20:41:42 Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> > On 02/19/2011 10:14 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
>
> >> Should I be enabling udev globally in make.conf? I'm currently not. I
> >> do have it on xorg-server so I'm not seeing the
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 02/19/2011 10:14 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>> Should I be enabling udev globally in make.conf? I'm currently not. I
>> do have it on xorg-server so I'm not seeing the OP's issue, but I
>> never wanted to get into making my own udev rule
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 02/19/2011 08:32 PM, Dale wrote:
>>
>> Mark Knecht wrote:
>>>
>> Don't forget to enable udev as Mike suggested too. I put mine in the USE
>> line. After all, about all hardware now uses udev to see hardware.
>
> You only need "evdev"
On 02/19/2011 10:41 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 02/19/2011 10:14 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
Should I be enabling udev globally in make.conf? I'm currently not. I
do have it on xorg-server so I'm not seeing the OP's issue, but I
never wante
On 02/19/2011 03:41 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>> On 02/19/2011 10:14 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
>>> Should I be enabling udev globally in make.conf? I'm currently not. I
>>> do have it on xorg-server so I'm not seeing the OP's issue, but I
>
On 02/19/2011 10:14 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 02/19/2011 08:32 PM, Dale wrote:
Mark Knecht wrote:
Don't forget to enable udev as Mike suggested too. I put mine in the USE
line. After all, about all hardware now uses udev to see h
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
You only need "evdev". "keyboard" and "mouse" are deprecated drivers.
They have bugs that no one appears to be fixing anymore.
I been wondering about that but never saw emerge complain so I left it
in there, after all, it is working so why try to fix it. I'll r
On 02/19/2011 01:46 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
[snip]
>>
>> INPUT_DEVICES="keyboard mouse evdev"
>>
>> Don't forget to enable udev as Mike suggested too. I put mine in the USE
>> line. After all, about all hardware now uses udev to see hardware.
>
> You only need "evdev". "keyboard" and "mouse"
On 02/19/2011 01:24 PM, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>> On 02/19/2011 07:44 PM, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
[snip]
>>> emerge --depclean -vp
>>> Dependencies could not be completely resolved due to
>>> the following required packages not being i
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 02/19/2011 07:44 PM, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>> I have just updated xorg to 1.9.4 with USE -hal and removed hal in
>> this order (also needed to remove hal from the default run level). I
>> tried startx using the existing
On 02/19/2011 08:32 PM, Dale wrote:
Mark Knecht wrote:
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Valmor de
Almeida wrote:
[...]
I have just updated xorg to 1.9.4 with USE -hal and removed hal in
this order (also needed to remove hal from the default run level). I
tried startx using the existing xorg.con
Valmor de Almeida wrote:
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 02/19/2011 07:44 PM, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
[...]
I have just updated xorg to 1.9.4 with USE -hal and removed hal in
this order (also needed to remove hal from the default run level). I
tried sta
On 02/19/2011 08:24 PM, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 02/19/2011 07:44 PM, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
[...]
I have just updated xorg to 1.9.4 with USE -hal and removed hal in
this order (also needed to remove hal from the default run level
On 02/19/2011 07:44 PM, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
[...]
I have just updated xorg to 1.9.4 with USE -hal and removed hal in
this order (also needed to remove hal from the default run level). I
tried startx using the existing xorg.conf and X does not start
correctly, I have no mouse and a frozen sc
On Thursday 06 January 2011, Vaeth wrote:
> > Lately it seems that eix disregards the content of
> > /etc/portage/package.keywords.nowarn
>
> From the ChangeLog:
>
> *eix-0.22.1 [...]
> - use /etc/portage/package.nowarn instead of
> /etc/portage/package.*.nowarn; the latter is now obsolete.
on 2010-04-07 at 20:01 Kerin Millar wrote:
>It can be done with Perl.
i was afraid someone was going to say that... :-)
> perl -M'encoding utf8' -MUnicode::Normalize -pe
> '$_=NFKD($_);s/\pM//og'
that works great, kerin, thank you! no idea though what $_=NFKD($_)
might mean... that's fine, i'l
On 07/04/2010 17:21, luis jure wrote:
hello list.
i have a bunch of files with accented characters in their names, both
upper- and lower case. i want to rename them using the non-accented
equivalent. i thought that would be easy to do using something like tr.
big mistake. confronted with accent
change. Copy the ebuild to your
private overlay and modify it there to preserve your changes.
More details: portage documentation gotten via:
equery files portage | grep man
>
> --- On Mon, 3/29/10, Paul Hartman wrote:
> > From: Paul Hartman
> > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user]
If one tries to modify the ebuild and test a change, the system issues a file
size error. How do you get around that?
--- On Mon, 3/29/10, Paul Hartman wrote:
> From: Paul Hartman
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: help
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Date: Monday, March 29, 20
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Stroller
wrote:
On 29 Mar 2010, at 13:22, Dale wrote:
...
Filling bug reports is important. I filled over 50 on b.g.o this year
alone. All of them are version bumps or bad homepages. Some programs haven't
been bumped for 5 years.
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Stroller
wrote:
>
> On 29 Mar 2010, at 13:22, Dale wrote:
>>>
>>> ...
>>> Filling bug reports is important. I filled over 50 on b.g.o this year
>>> alone. All of them are version bumps or bad homepages. Some programs haven't
>>> been bumped for 5 years.
>>
>> That
On 29 Mar 2010, at 13:22, Dale wrote:
...
Filling bug reports is important. I filled over 50 on b.g.o this
year alone. All of them are version bumps or bad homepages. Some
programs haven't been bumped for 5 years.
That is true but I don't have a account there. Someone else does so
they
KH wrote:
Am 24.03.2010 23:18, schrieb Dale:
Alex Schuster wrote:
Is there a bug report files already?
I haven't filed one. I'm just hoping someone has.
Filling bug reports is important. I filled over 50 on b.g.o this year
alone. All of them are version bumps or bad homepages. Some program
Am 24.03.2010 23:18, schrieb Dale:
Alex Schuster wrote:
Is there a bug report files already?
I haven't filed one. I'm just hoping someone has.
Filling bug reports is important. I filled over 50 on b.g.o this year
alone. All of them are version bumps or bad homepages. Some programs
haven't
Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 25. März 2010 schrieb Dale:
I want the desktop slideshow to be sequential instead of random.
Is there a bug report files already?
I haven't filed one. I'm just hoping someone has.
If you are like me and don’t w
Am Donnerstag, 25. März 2010 schrieb Dale:
> I want the desktop slideshow to be sequential instead of random.
Is there a bug report files already?
>>> I haven't filed one. I'm just hoping someone has.
>> If you are like me and don’t wanna create another bug tracker account
>> just for on
KH wrote:
Am 26.03.2010 00:24, schrieb Dale:
I would have to modify the script since it does random too. If KDE4
isn't broke now, I would surely finish it off if I started writing
scripts. LOL I would think it could be disabled somehow but the folks on
KDE mailing list couldn't find a way eithe
Am 26.03.2010 00:24, schrieb Dale:
I would have to modify the script since it does random too. If KDE4
isn't broke now, I would surely finish it off if I started writing
scripts. LOL I would think it could be disabled somehow but the folks on
KDE mailing list couldn't find a way either. I even s
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Dale wrote:
Since someone else mentioned KDE4, I do look forward to 4.5. I'm hoping for
some fixes too. I want the desktop slideshow to be sequential instead of
random. I have a lot of pics that are taken to be a slideshow but if done
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Dale wrote:
> Since someone else mentioned KDE4, I do look forward to 4.5. I'm hoping for
> some fixes too. I want the desktop slideshow to be sequential instead of
> random. I have a lot of pics that are taken to be a slideshow but if done
> in random order, th
Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 24. März 2010 schrieb Dale:
Alex Schuster wrote:
Dale writes:
Since someone else mentioned KDE4, I do look forward to 4.5. I'm
hoping for some fixes too. I want the desktop slideshow to be
sequential instead of random. I have a lot of
Am Mittwoch, 24. März 2010 schrieb Dale:
> Alex Schuster wrote:
> > Dale writes:
> >> Since someone else mentioned KDE4, I do look forward to 4.5. I'm
> >> hoping for some fixes too. I want the desktop slideshow to be
> >> sequential instead of random. I have a lot of pics that are taken to
> >>
Michael Edenfield wrote:
On Wednesday 24 March 2010 15:41:57 Alan McKinnon wrote:
It makes me just a little bit sad to see that the next version of Xorg
(ebuild sitting in some testing proving ground somewhere) will not use hal
at all. What will we talk about now on slow news days?
$
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 07:50:08PM -0400, Michael Edenfield wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 March 2010 15:41:57 Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> > It makes me just a little bit sad to see that the next version of Xorg
> > (ebuild sitting in some testing proving ground somewhere) will not use hal
> > at all. What
On Wednesday 24 March 2010 15:41:57 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> It makes me just a little bit sad to see that the next version of Xorg
> (ebuild sitting in some testing proving ground somewhere) will not use hal
> at all. What will we talk about now on slow news days?
$5 says Dale won't get devicekit
Alex Schuster wrote:
Dale writes:
Since someone else mentioned KDE4, I do look forward to 4.5. I'm
hoping for some fixes too. I want the desktop slideshow to be
sequential instead of random. I have a lot of pics that are taken to
be a slideshow but if done in random order, they make no s
Dale writes:
> Since someone else mentioned KDE4, I do look forward to 4.5. I'm
> hoping for some fixes too. I want the desktop slideshow to be
> sequential instead of random. I have a lot of pics that are taken to
> be a slideshow but if done in random order, they make no sense at all.
> All I
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wednesday 24 March 2010 21:19:04 Dale wrote:
Keith Dart wrote:
=== On Sat, 03/20, Neil Bothwick wrote: ===
r maybe he needs help turning off the white text on a white background
setting :)
===
This is the longest thread about nothing that
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 09:16:12PM +0100, Alex Schuster wrote:
> Alan McKinnon asks:
>
> > And Dale himself holds the record for starting the longest email thread
> > ever outside of UseNet.
> >
> > It started with ... wait for it ... Xorg and hal!
> >
> > It makes me just a little bit sad to se
Alan McKinnon asks:
> And Dale himself holds the record for starting the longest email thread
> ever outside of UseNet.
>
> It started with ... wait for it ... Xorg and hal!
>
> It makes me just a little bit sad to see that the next version of Xorg
> (ebuild sitting in some testing proving groun
On Wednesday 24 March 2010 21:19:04 Dale wrote:
> Keith Dart wrote:
> > === On Sat, 03/20, Neil Bothwick wrote: ===
> >
> >> r maybe he needs help turning off the white text on a white background
> >> setting :)
> >
> > ===
> >
> > This is the longest thread about nothing that I have ever seen.
Keith Dart wrote:
=== On Sat, 03/20, Neil Bothwick wrote: ===
r maybe he needs help turning off the white text on a white background
setting :)
===
This is the longest thread about nothing that I have ever seen.
-- Keith Dart
You ain't been around here to long then have ya?
Score 2 points for mr. obvious. :D
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Keith Dart wrote:
> === On Sat, 03/20, Neil Bothwick wrote: ===
> > r maybe he needs help turning off the white text on a white background
> > setting :)
>
> ===
>
> This is the longest thread about nothing that I have ever seen
=== On Sat, 03/20, Neil Bothwick wrote: ===
> r maybe he needs help turning off the white text on a white background
> setting :)
===
This is the longest thread about nothing that I have ever seen.
-- Keith Dart
--
-- ~
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 12:21:06AM +0100, KH wrote:
> Am 22.03.2010 23:51, schrieb Mick:
>
> >>
> >> In Germany you are still free to sell the software to a third person who
> >> is insane enough to buy Windows ;-)
> >
> > But how can you sell it - I think that it is an OEM license which will only
Am 23.03.2010 01:51, schrieb walt:
On 03/22/2010 04:21 PM, KH wrote:
> ...
There even is a tool you can download from Microsoft to change your key -
> like you once hat a pirated version with a cracked key and now you
want to
> turn legal again. Download the tool, enter the code you bought,
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:47:57 -0500, Dale wrote:
> > If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
> > ...Oh, wait a minute, he already does.
> >
>
> You sig was sort of ironic considering the subject discussed. That
> thing have ESP or something?
It does seem like it
On 22 Mar 2010, at 17:05, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 03/22/2010 06:54 PM, Paul Hartman wrote:
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Stroller
wrote:
I was very impressed by Windows 7 recently. I installed it for a
customer
and it seems wonderful. I even considered trying it myself, but I
re
On 22 Mar 2010, at 22:09, Alan McKinnon wrote:
There is nothing unfair about this. No vendor has a *duty* so sell
you
what you want and they cannot be forced to. Microsoft does not
enforce
that vendors sell Windows-only machines (and they proved as such
to the
relevant Commission). .
On 22 Mar 2010, at 22:51, Mick wrote:
...
In Germany you are still free to sell the software to a third
person who
is insane enough to buy Windows ;-)
But how can you sell it - I think that it is an OEM license which
will only
run in the machine that Dell bought it for, from Microsoft.
On 22 Mar 2010, at 23:21, KH wrote:
... There even is a tool you can download from Microsoft to change
your key - like you once hat a pirated version with a cracked key
and now you want to turn legal again. Download the tool, enter the
code you bought, you are done without installing every
On 03/22/2010 04:21 PM, KH wrote:
> ...
There even is a tool you can download from Microsoft to change your key -
> like you once hat a pirated version with a cracked key and now you want to
> turn legal again. Download the tool, enter the code you bought, you are
> done without installing every
Neil Bothwick wrote:
--
Neil Bothwick
If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
...Oh, wait a minute, he already does.
You sig was sort of ironic considering the subject discussed. That
thing have ESP or something?
Dale
:-) :-)
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:56:33 +, Mick wrote:
> On Monday 22 March 2010 22:00:38 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:55:34 +, Neil Walker wrote:
> > > The real insanity is buying over-priced crap from Dell. ;)
> >
> > The Dell Mini 10 I bought was very reasonably priced.
> >
KH wrote:
Oh and all of this started with a email just saying "help". Wander
what another word could have done.
kh
Maybe he should have said PLEASE help. lol
Where is the OP anyway?
Dale
:-)
Oh and all of this started with a email just saying "help". Wander what
another word could have done.
kh
Am 22.03.2010 23:51, schrieb Mick:
In Germany you are still free to sell the software to a third person who
is insane enough to buy Windows ;-)
But how can you sell it - I think that it is an OEM license which will only
run in the machine that Dell bought it for, from Microsoft.
I'll try run
On Monday 22 March 2010 22:00:38 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:55:34 +, Neil Walker wrote:
> > The real insanity is buying over-priced crap from Dell. ;)
>
> The Dell Mini 10 I bought was very reasonably priced.
>
> So that deals with the over-priced issue...
I did some resea
On Monday 22 March 2010 22:04:24 KH wrote:
> Am 22.03.2010 23:01, schrieb Stroller:
> > On 22 Mar 2010, at 19:21, KH wrote:
> >> Am 22.03.2010 20:17, schrieb Mick:
> >>> TBH, I wouldn't pay money for it but as many OEM impose a MSWindows
> >>> tax on
> >>> all of us I had no other option if I wante
On 22 Mar 2010, at 22:04, KH wrote:
Am 22.03.2010 23:01, schrieb Stroller:
On 22 Mar 2010, at 19:21, KH wrote:
Am 22.03.2010 20:17, schrieb Mick:
TBH, I wouldn't pay money for it but as many OEM impose a
MSWindows tax on all of us I had no other option if I wanted to
buy this particular
On Tuesday 23 March 2010 00:00:38 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:55:34 +, Neil Walker wrote:
> > The real insanity is buying over-priced crap from Dell. ;)
>
> The Dell Mini 10 I bought was very reasonably priced.
>
> So that deals with the over-priced issue...
The Dell XPS M1
On Tuesday 23 March 2010 00:02:54 Zeerak Mustafa Waseem wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:36:59PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On Monday 22 March 2010 21:21:26 KH wrote:
> > > Am 22.03.2010 20:17, schrieb Mick:
> > > > TBH, I wouldn't pay money for it but as many OEM impose a MSWindows
> > > >
Am 22.03.2010 23:01, schrieb Stroller:
On 22 Mar 2010, at 19:21, KH wrote:
Am 22.03.2010 20:17, schrieb Mick:
TBH, I wouldn't pay money for it but as many OEM impose a MSWindows
tax on
all of us I had no other option if I wanted to buy this particular
laptop.
You can refuse the license agre
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:36:59PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Monday 22 March 2010 21:21:26 KH wrote:
> > Am 22.03.2010 20:17, schrieb Mick:
> > > TBH, I wouldn't pay money for it but as many OEM impose a MSWindows tax
> > > on all of us I had no other option if I wanted to buy this particula
On 22 Mar 2010, at 19:21, KH wrote:
Am 22.03.2010 20:17, schrieb Mick:
TBH, I wouldn't pay money for it but as many OEM impose a MSWindows
tax on
all of us I had no other option if I wanted to buy this particular
laptop.
You can refuse the license agreement and give windows back. If you
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:55:34 +, Neil Walker wrote:
> The real insanity is buying over-priced crap from Dell. ;)
The Dell Mini 10 I bought was very reasonably priced.
So that deals with the over-priced issue...
--
Neil Bothwick
Standard: (n., adj.) a design target which manufacturers may
On Monday 22 March 2010 21:21:26 KH wrote:
> Am 22.03.2010 20:17, schrieb Mick:
> > TBH, I wouldn't pay money for it but as many OEM impose a MSWindows tax
> > on all of us I had no other option if I wanted to buy this particular
> > laptop.
>
> You can refuse the license agreement and give window
On 22/03/10 20:33, Mike Edenfield wrote:
> "Sure, we'll happily sell you one of three crappy laptop models with
> Ubuntu pre-installed, at a slight discount, while bombarding you with
> 'Dell Recommends Windows' ads while you shop. What's that? You want a
> desktop machine with Linux? Are you i
On 22/03/10 19:21, KH wrote:
> Am 22.03.2010 20:17, schrieb Mick:
>
>>
>> TBH, I wouldn't pay money for it but as many OEM impose a MSWindows
>> tax on
>> all of us I had no other option if I wanted to buy this particular
>> laptop.
>
> You can refuse the license agreement and give windows back. If
On 03/22/2010 10:33 PM, Mike Edenfield wrote:
On 3/22/2010 3:40 PM, Mick wrote:
On Monday 22 March 2010 19:21:26 KH wrote:
Am 22.03.2010 20:17, schrieb Mick:
TBH, I wouldn't pay money for it but as many OEM impose a MSWindows tax
on all of us I had no other option if I wanted to buy this parti
On 3/22/2010 3:40 PM, Mick wrote:
> On Monday 22 March 2010 19:21:26 KH wrote:
>> Am 22.03.2010 20:17, schrieb Mick:
>>> TBH, I wouldn't pay money for it but as many OEM impose a MSWindows tax
>>> on all of us I had no other option if I wanted to buy this particular
>>> laptop.
>>
>> You can refuse
On Monday 22 March 2010 19:21:26 KH wrote:
> Am 22.03.2010 20:17, schrieb Mick:
> > TBH, I wouldn't pay money for it but as many OEM impose a MSWindows tax
> > on all of us I had no other option if I wanted to buy this particular
> > laptop.
>
> You can refuse the license agreement and give window
Am 22.03.2010 20:17, schrieb Mick:
TBH, I wouldn't pay money for it but as many OEM impose a MSWindows tax on
all of us I had no other option if I wanted to buy this particular laptop.
You can refuse the license agreement and give windows back. If you are
lucky, the vendor will give you some
On Monday 22 March 2010 17:05:12 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 03/22/2010 06:54 PM, Paul Hartman wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Stroller
> >
> > wrote:
> >> I was very impressed by Windows 7 recently. I installed it for a
> >> customer and it seems wonderful. I even considered trying
On 03/22/2010 06:54 PM, Paul Hartman wrote:
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Stroller
wrote:
I was very impressed by Windows 7 recently. I installed it for a customer
and it seems wonderful. I even considered trying it myself, but I realised
that the inability to copy settings from one profil
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Stroller
wrote:
>
> I was very impressed by Windows 7 recently. I installed it for a customer
> and it seems wonderful. I even considered trying it myself, but I realised
> that the inability to copy settings from one profile or machine to another
> is a *complete*
Am 20.03.2010 22:28, schrieb Nikos Chantziaras:
[...]
And people still claim it's Microsoft products that are bugged... :P
They call it improvement and not bugfixing.
On 20 Mar 2010, at 21:28, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
...
So, I had to create a new profile, copy the good stuff over to fix
the
issue with Seamonkey. Now I can send a new message and it not be
blank.
I think it annoyed the list but it really got on my nerves. After
all,
who wants to spend 2
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 03/20/2010 10:46 PM, Dale wrote:
Michael Sullivan wrote:
On Sat, 2010-03-20 at 14:55 -0300, Crístian Viana wrote:
or maybe he's using Seamonkey, like Dale :-) :-).
Hey! What's wrong with seamonkey?
I upgraded from Seamonkey 1 to Seamonkey 2. I let it copy the s
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
