On Friday 13 Mar 2015 15:49:38 Dale wrote:
> Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Friday 13 March 2015 06:27:00 Dale wrote:
> >> Peter Humphrey wrote:
> >>> On Thursday 12 March 2015 19:38:56 Dale wrote:
> I build everything into the kernel and I don't even install
> lm_sensors. I haven't install
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Friday 13 March 2015 06:27:00 Dale wrote:
>> Peter Humphrey wrote:
>>> On Thursday 12 March 2015 19:38:56 Dale wrote:
I build everything into the kernel and I don't even install
lm_sensors. I haven't installed that in ages.
>>> Does that mean that your gkrellm c
On Friday 13 March 2015 06:27:00 Dale wrote:
> Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Thursday 12 March 2015 19:38:56 Dale wrote:
> >> I build everything into the kernel and I don't even install
> >> lm_sensors. I haven't installed that in ages.
> >
> > Does that mean that your gkrellm can't display tempera
Tuomo Hartikainen wrote:
> On 150312 1835, Dale wrote:
>> waben...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> Something similar happened to me. I accidentally pressed F6 while
>>> focused gkrellm but didn't noticed it. Some time later I realized that
>>> the fontsize of gkrellm was increased so that it's height doesn't
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Thursday 12 March 2015 19:38:56 Dale wrote:
>
>> I build everything into the kernel and I don't even install
>> lm_sensors. I haven't installed that in ages.
> Does that mean that your gkrellm can't display temperatures?
>
It's been displaying temps for many years. I po
Mick wrote:
>
>
>
> I don't have the same MoBo and have compiled my corresponding chipset
sensor
> driver as a module. It doesn't load unless I manually modprobe it or
set it
> up in /etc/conf.d/modules. This is how many readings I get:
>
> $ sensors
> radeon-pci-0008
> Adapter: PCI adapter
> tem
On Thursday 12 March 2015 19:38:56 Dale wrote:
> I build everything into the kernel and I don't even install
> lm_sensors. I haven't installed that in ages.
Does that mean that your gkrellm can't display temperatures?
--
Rgds
Peter.
On Friday 13 Mar 2015 00:38:56 Dale wrote:
> James wrote:
> > Mick gmail.com> writes:
> >>> # sensors
> >>> radeon-pci-0100
> >>> Adapter: PCI adapter
> >>> temp1:+36.0°C (crit = +120.0°C, hyst = +90.0°C)
> >>> fam15h_power-pci-00c4
> >>> Adapter: PCI adapter
> >>> power1: 19.97 W
On 150312 1835, Dale wrote:
> waben...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Something similar happened to me. I accidentally pressed F6 while
> > focused gkrellm but didn't noticed it. Some time later I realized that
> > the fontsize of gkrellm was increased so that it's height doesn't fit
> > to the screen anymor
James wrote:
> Mick gmail.com> writes:
>
>
>>> # sensors
>>> radeon-pci-0100
>>> Adapter: PCI adapter
>>> temp1:+36.0°C (crit = +120.0°C, hyst = +90.0°C)
>>> fam15h_power-pci-00c4
>>> Adapter: PCI adapter
>>> power1: 19.97 W (crit = 125.19 W)
>
>>> k10temp-pci-00c3
>>> Adapter:
Mick gmail.com> writes:
> > # sensors
> > radeon-pci-0100
> > Adapter: PCI adapter
> > temp1:+36.0°C (crit = +120.0°C, hyst = +90.0°C)
> > fam15h_power-pci-00c4
> > Adapter: PCI adapter
> > power1: 19.97 W (crit = 125.19 W)
> > k10temp-pci-00c3
> > Adapter: PCI adapter
> > tem
waben...@gmail.com wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 12.03.2015 um 14:40
> schrieb Dale :
>
>> Peter Humphrey wrote:
>>> On Friday 27 February 2015 21:41:33 waben...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
You can switch the numerics on and off by left mouse click into the
respective monitor.
>>> Well, I'll be damned
Am Donnerstag, 12.03.2015 um 14:40
schrieb Dale :
> Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Friday 27 February 2015 21:41:33 waben...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> >> You can switch the numerics on and off by left mouse click into the
> >> respective monitor.
> > Well, I'll be damned! I never found that out for mys
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 22:38:33 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Well, it's just as I always say: you learn something new every day - if
> you're not careful! :-)
As the old saying goes: experience is what you get when you didn't get
what you wanted :)
--
Neil Bothwick
I'm Pink, Therefore I'm Spa
On Thursday 12 March 2015 14:40:09 Dale wrote:
> Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Friday 27 February 2015 21:41:33 waben...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> You can switch the numerics on and off by left mouse click into the
> >> respective monitor.
> >
> > Well, I'll be damned! I never found that out for myself
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Friday 27 February 2015 21:41:33 waben...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> You can switch the numerics on and off by left mouse click into the
>> respective monitor.
> Well, I'll be damned! I never found that out for myself, not in all
> those years of using it.
>
> So no bug here
On Thursday 26 Feb 2015 20:13:07 James wrote:
> I'm not sure how to moinor the CPU (8 cores) temperature
> and if it is a calculated (estimated value) or a real temp?
>
> # sensors
> radeon-pci-0100
> Adapter: PCI adapter
> temp1:+36.0°C (crit = +120.0°C, hyst = +90.0°C)
>
> fam15h_power
On Friday 27 February 2015 21:41:33 waben...@gmail.com wrote:
> You can switch the numerics on and off by left mouse click into the
> respective monitor.
Well, I'll be damned! I never found that out for myself, not in all
those years of using it.
So no bug here then. Sorry Dale :)
--
Rgds
Pet
Am Freitag, 27.02.2015 um 09:43
schrieb Peter Humphrey :
> On Friday 27 February 2015 09:02:18 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 02:27:03 -0600, Dale wrote:
> > > > Yes, I have two instances of it running permanently too. Though
> > > > I think James is right too, in that it does still
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 02:27:03 -0600, Dale wrote:
>
>>> Yes, I have two instances of it running permanently too. Though I
>>> think James is right too, in that it does still have the odd bug.
>> I haven't had any trouble with mine. It just sits there and runs until
>> I logout
On Friday 27 February 2015 09:02:18 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 02:27:03 -0600, Dale wrote:
> > > Yes, I have two instances of it running permanently too. Though I
> > > think James is right too, in that it does still have the odd bug.
> >
> > I haven't had any trouble with mine. I
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 02:27:03 -0600, Dale wrote:
> > Yes, I have two instances of it running permanently too. Though I
> > think James is right too, in that it does still have the odd bug.
> I haven't had any trouble with mine. It just sits there and runs until
> I logout. What is this bug it su
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Thursday 26 February 2015 19:48:06 Dale wrote:
>
>> While it has been a while since I used gkrellm to monitor a remote
>> system, I use it every day to monitor my system I sit at. Keep in
>> mind, not much changes on how gkrellm works. It looks for
>> temp/fan/CPU/memor
Am 27.02.2015 um 02:23 schrieb James:
> Volker Armin Hemmann googlemail.com> writes:
>
>
>> em, but you are already monitoring it!
> Maybe. It hard to tell if there are more than one
> temperature sensor, what buss interfacet they are on
> and if it is a calculated or esitmated or actual temperatu
On Thursday 26 February 2015 19:48:06 Dale wrote:
> While it has been a while since I used gkrellm to monitor a remote
> system, I use it every day to monitor my system I sit at. Keep in
> mind, not much changes on how gkrellm works. It looks for
> temp/fan/CPU/memory etc info and displays it.
James wrote:
> Dale gmail.com> writes:
>
>
>>> I need to monitor this hardware for temperatures, including logging
>>> of temperatures, on as wide array of temperature sensors that is
>>> possible with kernel 3.18.6-gentoo.)
>> I'm not sure if this is still available or not but doesn't gkrellm do
Dale gmail.com> writes:
> > I need to monitor this hardware for temperatures, including logging
> > of temperatures, on as wide array of temperature sensors that is
> > possible with kernel 3.18.6-gentoo.)
> I'm not sure if this is still available or not but doesn't gkrellm do
> this sort of th
Volker Armin Hemmann googlemail.com> writes:
> em, but you are already monitoring it!
Maybe. It hard to tell if there are more than one
temperature sensor, what buss interfacet they are on
and if it is a calculated or esitmated or actual temperature
sensor.
> >> Does anyone with similar hardw
Am 26.02.2015 um 21:13 schrieb James:
> James tampabay.rr.com> writes:
>
>
>> modprobe: FATAL: Module i2c-piix4 not found.
>> Failed to load module i2c-piix4.
> OK, so I found this code and added it to the kernel.
>
>
>> Next adapter: Radeon i2c bit bus 0x90 (i2c-0)
>> Do you want to scan it? (yes
James tampabay.rr.com> writes:
> modprobe: FATAL: Module i2c-piix4 not found.
> Failed to load module i2c-piix4.
OK, so I found this code and added it to the kernel.
> Next adapter: Radeon i2c bit bus 0x90 (i2c-0)
> Do you want to scan it? (yes/NO/selectively): yes
> {through (i2c-7) all fail
30 matches
Mail list logo
