On Thursday, 14 November 2019 23:17:16 GMT Daniel Frey wrote:
> I've also had interfaces randomly rename themselves (more than once.)
> The second time it happened I forced the old behaviour and haven't had
> any problems since... that was like six years ago now? (Or maybe more...)
>
> Dan
+1, b
On 2019-11-14 08:21, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2019-11-13, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
PS: Old interface names were way more guessable than the new ones (eth0
used to work 99% of time). I really don’t understand why someone woke a
morning a though “we should randomise this, it’s too much stable”.
The
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 11:21 AM Grant Edwards
wrote:
>
> The way it was explained to me was that the old way fell down in some
> situations with multiple interfaces. Interfaces were named in the
> order they were disovered by the kernel during startup. For some
> sorts of NICs (e.g. PCI) the di
On 2019-11-13, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> PS: Old interface names were way more guessable than the new ones (eth0
> used to work 99% of time). I really don’t understand why someone woke a
> morning a though “we should randomise this, it’s too much stable”.
The way it was explained to me was that the
4 matches
Mail list logo
