Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerging procmail failure

2009-06-11 Thread Paul Hartman
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Harry Putnam wrote: > Paul Hartman writes: > >> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Harry Putnam wrote: >>> >>> Yes... except _OH CRAP_ I've forgotten whatever little tiny skill I once >>> had to add a patch into the emerge process manually. >> >> man ebuild >> >> HT

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerging procmail failure

2009-06-11 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:04:33 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote: > > man ebuild > I see no hits at all on either `overlay' or `layman' in man ebuild. > There must be more to the story than just running ebuild commands. And > expect the modified ebuild to be accepted by emerge. That's because the instruct

[gentoo-user] Re: emerging procmail failure

2009-06-10 Thread Harry Putnam
Paul Hartman writes: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Harry Putnam wrote: >> >> Yes... except _OH CRAP_ I've forgotten whatever little tiny skill I once >> had to add a patch into the emerge process manually. > > man ebuild Just in case another intellectually challenged gentoo user happens to

[gentoo-user] Re: emerging procmail failure

2009-06-10 Thread Harry Putnam
Paul Hartman writes: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Harry Putnam wrote: >> >> Yes... except _OH CRAP_ I've forgotten whatever little tiny skill I once >> had to add a patch into the emerge process manually. > > man ebuild > > HTH :) Doesn't any manual patching have to be done in an overlay?

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerging procmail failure

2009-06-10 Thread Johám-Luís Miguéns Vila
Harry Putnam writes: > Or dink around with sed inside as another poster on the bug > did... also manually. Just do a less on /usr/portage/mail-filter/procmail/procmail-3.22-r10.ebuild and you'll see a good example. Cheers. -- Education is the process of casting false pearls before real swine.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerging procmail failure

2009-06-10 Thread Johám-Luís Miguéns Vila
Harry Putnam writes: > galiza.ce...@gmail.com (Johám-Luís Miguéns Vila) writes: > >> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=270551 >> >> HTH > > Yes... except _OH CRAP_ I've forgotten whatever little tiny skill I once > had to add a patch into the emerge process manually. > > Or dink around with

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerging procmail failure

2009-06-10 Thread Paul Hartman
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Harry Putnam wrote: > > Yes... except _OH CRAP_ I've forgotten whatever little tiny skill I once > had to add a patch into the emerge process manually. man ebuild HTH :)

[gentoo-user] Re: emerging procmail failure

2009-06-10 Thread Harry Putnam
galiza.ce...@gmail.com (Johám-Luís Miguéns Vila) writes: > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=270551 > > HTH Yes... except _OH CRAP_ I've forgotten whatever little tiny skill I once had to add a patch into the emerge process manually. Or dink around with sed inside as another poster on the b