Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge broken - libstdc++.so.5

2006-06-05 Thread Lord Sauron
On 6/5/06, Rafael Fernández López <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You guys !! The only way to understand and learn is TO BREAK IT xD. I wanna say that about half my knowledge I get from fixing things that have gone wrong... okay, things that have gone wrong because of a misintended command from me

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge broken - libstdc++.so.5

2006-06-05 Thread Rafael Fernández López
You guys !! The only way to understand and learn is TO BREAK IT xD. Bye !! ;) -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge broken - libstdc++.so.5

2006-06-05 Thread Mark Knecht
> > > > dragonfly ~ # eix libstd > > eix: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++.so.5: cannot open > > shared object file: No such file or directory > > dragonfly ~ # > > That's because the tarball pointed to from that page is for 3.4.x, > which contains libstdc++.so.6 - libstdc++.so.5 is

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge broken - libstdc++.so.5

2006-06-05 Thread Mark Knecht
On 6/5/06, James Ausmus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 6/5/06, Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, >For a few moments I thought this might be the problem, and I though > I might end up on the Wall of Shame (tm) but in fact this doesn't > solve my problem since it doesn't install libst

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge broken - libstdc++.so.5

2006-06-05 Thread James Ausmus
On 6/5/06, Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, For a few moments I thought this might be the problem, and I though I might end up on the Wall of Shame (tm) but in fact this doesn't solve my problem since it doesn't install libstdc++.so.5 dragonfly ~ # gcc-config -l [1] i686-pc-linux-g

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge broken - libstdc++.so.5

2006-06-05 Thread Lord Sauron
On 6/5/06, Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 6/5/06, leszek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Like many things in life this pain seems to be somewhat self > > inflicted, I suppose. More into. > > > > After emerging gcc-3.4.6 I had troubles with the gcc-config stuff so I > > removed gcc-3.3

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge broken - libstdc++.so.5

2006-06-05 Thread Mark Knecht
On 6/5/06, leszek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Like many things in life this pain seems to be somewhat self > inflicted, I suppose. More into. > > After emerging gcc-3.4.6 I had troubles with the gcc-config stuff so I > removed gcc-3.3.6. However it appears that removing 3.3.6 removed > libstdc+

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge broken - libstdc++.so.5

2006-06-05 Thread Teresa and Dale
leszek wrote: > >the solution to your problem is here: >http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Recover_from_%22emerge_--unmerge_gcc%22 > >and you can add yourself to the wall of shame too ;) > > >-Leszek > > > I have never done it but don't worry, you are definitely not alone. I guess that is why the

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge broken - libstdc++.so.5

2006-06-05 Thread leszek
> Like many things in life this pain seems to be somewhat self > inflicted, I suppose. More into. > > After emerging gcc-3.4.6 I had troubles with the gcc-config stuff so I > removed gcc-3.3.6. However it appears that removing 3.3.6 removed > libstdc++ also. I updated slocate's database and saw t

[gentoo-user] Re: emerge broken - libstdc++.so.5

2006-06-05 Thread Mark Knecht
On 6/5/06, Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I've been working through some updates on my wife's machine and now it appears emerge itself has been broken: dragonfly ~ # emerge -pv bash /usr/bin/python: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++.so.5: cannot open shared object fi