[gentoo-user] Re: elog default lifespan

2016-11-26 Thread Harry Putnam
Daniel Campbell writes: > On 11/19/2016 04:21 PM, Harry Putnam wrote: >> Mick writes: >> >>> On Saturday 19 Nov 2016 08:54:53 Harry Putnam wrote: After looking thru the portage man pages, the make.conf.example in /usr/share/portage/config, and the `Portage log wiki' it still is not >>

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: elog default lifespan

2016-11-20 Thread Daniel Campbell
On 11/19/2016 04:21 PM, Harry Putnam wrote: > Mick writes: > >> On Saturday 19 Nov 2016 08:54:53 Harry Putnam wrote: >>> After looking thru the portage man pages, the make.conf.example in >>> /usr/share/portage/config, and the `Portage log wiki' it still is not >>> clear to me how long elogs are

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: elog default lifespan

2016-11-19 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 20/11/2016 02:21, Harry Putnam wrote: > Mick writes: > >> On Saturday 19 Nov 2016 08:54:53 Harry Putnam wrote: >>> After looking thru the portage man pages, the make.conf.example in >>> /usr/share/portage/config, and the `Portage log wiki' it still is not >>> clear to me how long elogs are kep

[gentoo-user] Re: elog default lifespan

2016-11-19 Thread Harry Putnam
Mick writes: > On Saturday 19 Nov 2016 08:54:53 Harry Putnam wrote: >> After looking thru the portage man pages, the make.conf.example in >> /usr/share/portage/config, and the `Portage log wiki' it still is not >> clear to me how long elogs are kept if you use the `save' flag in >> make.conf or n