On 2 June 2011 10:49, András Csányi wrote:
Hi All,
Just for the record. It looks like this problem is solved. I switched
back to gentoo-sources and I haven't experienced such problems which
is described in my first letter. I have used ck kernel. I would like
to emphasize that this doesn't mean t
On Friday 03 June 2011 19:49:40 Indi wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 12:50:02AM +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > On Friday 03 June 2011 22:50:28 Mick wrote:
> > > > > Agreed. I do wish we'd get something open and reasonably
> > > > > well coded
> > > > > to
> > > > > replace flash,
> > >
>
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 12:50:02AM +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Friday 03 June 2011 22:50:28 Mick wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Agreed. I do wish we'd get something open and reasonably well coded
> > > > to
> > > > replace flash,
> >
> > I do hope that html5 will do away with it altogether.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
wrote:
> On Friday 03 June 2011 22:50:28 Mick wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Agreed. I do wish we'd get something open and reasonably well coded
>> > > to
>> > > replace flash,
>>
>> I do hope that html5 will do away with it altogether.
>
> you can easil
On Friday 03 June 2011 22:50:28 Mick wrote:
> > >
> > > Agreed. I do wish we'd get something open and reasonably well coded
> > > to
> > > replace flash,
>
> I do hope that html5 will do away with it altogether.
you can easily block flash.
You won't be able to block all that moving add crap in
On Friday 03 Jun 2011 21:07:36 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 18:22 on Friday 03 June 2011, Indi did
> opine
>
> thusly:
> > > > Neither. Adobe is utterly incompetent and apathetic, google is evil
> > > > and wants to sell ad space for h3rb41 v14gr4 in your brain.
> > > >
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 10:20:02PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 18:22 on Friday 03 June 2011, Indi did opine
> thusly:
>
> > > > Neither. Adobe is utterly incompetent and apathetic, google is evil
> > > > and wants to sell ad space for h3rb41 v14gr4 in your brain.
Apparently, though unproven, at 18:22 on Friday 03 June 2011, Indi did opine
thusly:
> > > Neither. Adobe is utterly incompetent and apathetic, google is evil
> > > and wants to sell ad space for h3rb41 v14gr4 in your brain.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Flash is a necessary evil for a lot of us, chro
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 06:10:02PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 13:12 on Friday 03 June 2011, Indi did opine
> thusly:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 09:20:01AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > Compare how Google goes about doing things with how Adobe does it.
> >
Apparently, though unproven, at 13:12 on Friday 03 June 2011, Indi did opine
thusly:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 09:20:01AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Compare how Google goes about doing things with how Adobe does it.
> >
> > The Google Chromium team appears to take security seriously and are
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 09:20:01AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> Compare how Google goes about doing things with how Adobe does it.
>
> The Google Chromium team appears to take security seriously and are open and
> up-front about what they do.
>
> Adobe likes to stonewall on issues and create
Apparently, though unproven, at 02:07 on Friday 03 June 2011, walt did opine
thusly:
> On 06/02/2011 02:21 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Flash is a piece of shit that has never worked right and Adobe are a
> > bunch of fools that cannot code properly or securely.
>
> I agree 100%. My question is
On 06/02/2011 02:21 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Flash is a piece of shit that has never worked right and Adobe are a bunch of
> fools that cannot code properly or securely.
I agree 100%. My question is why they continue to be so successful in spite
of such a history. And they don't seem to be i
13 matches
Mail list logo
