On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 21:50:11 +0100, David W Noon wrote:
> > You can use unpack or prepare. The difference is that the former
> > runs immediately before the prepare function in the ebuild, the
> > latter immediately after. Not only does it save manifesting the
> > ebuild each time you modify it, i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 21:18:36 +0100, Neil Bothwick (n...@digimed.co.uk)
wrote about "Re: [gentoo-user] Re: XFCE weather plugin does not work"
(in <20141018211836.63981...@digimed.co.uk>):
> On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 17:18:34 +0100,
On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 17:18:34 +0100, David W Noon wrote:
> >> I have not done this relying on the promise by Greg Kubaryk
> >> that the ebuild is epatch_user enabled.
>
> That can be a bit variable. I still put the epatch_user command in
> explicitly, just to be certain.
You don't need to mo
On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 17:18:34 +0100
David W Noon wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 10:03:10 +0300, Gevisz (gev...@gmail.com) wrote
> about "Re: [gentoo-user] Re: XFCE weather plugin does not work" (in
> <544210d1.22a0700a.56bc.5...@mx.google.com>):
>
> On 18/10/14 08:03
On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 10:03:10 +0300, Gevisz (gev...@gmail.com) wrote
about "Re: [gentoo-user] Re: XFCE weather plugin does not work" (in
<544210d1.22a0700a.56bc.5...@mx.google.com>):
On 18/10/14 08:03, Gevisz wrote:
[snip]
>> I have unpacked your patches to /etc/portage/pat
On Sat, 18 October 2014, at 8:03 am, Gevisz wrote:
>
> I have unpacked your patches to /etc/portage/patches as described here:
> http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki//etc/portage/patches
> and then run # emerge xfce4-weather-plugin
>
> After restarting xfce4, the weather-plugin started to work. Thank y
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 23:37:16 +0100
David W Noon wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 22:33:45 +0100, Neil Bothwick (n...@digimed.co.uk)
> wrote about "Re: [gentoo-user] Re: XFCE weather plugin does not work"
&g
On 10/18/2014 02:37 AM, David W Noon wrote:
>
>
> I have prepared some patches from the Xfce repository with line
> addressing to match the Gentoo sources tarball. I attach a tarball of
> theses patches that can be untarred in /etc/portage/patches/
applied. thank you
Neil Bothwick digimed.co.uk> writes:
Thanks!
I'll have to give this a whirl. I would be interested to
see how things are organized under EAPI-6.
thanks again,
James
On 17 October 2014 23:37:16 BST, David W Noon wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 22:33:45 +0100, Neil Bothwick (n...@digimed.co.uk)
> wrote about "Re: [gentoo-user] Re: XFCE weather plugin does not work"
> (in <201410
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 22:33:45 +0100, Neil Bothwick (n...@digimed.co.uk)
wrote about "Re: [gentoo-user] Re: XFCE weather plugin does not work"
(in <20141017223345.16c96...@digimed.co.uk>):
> On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 21:13:52 +
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 21:13:52 + (UTC), James wrote:
> And last, can any patch that ends in .patch be applied to the
> intended ebuild or does the gentoo ebuild auther have to put
> some special code into an (EAPI-5) ebuild to facilitate user
> patches?
AFAIR the ebuild simply has to call epatc
Stroller stellar.eclipse.co.uk> writes:
> > If so, may I ask supporters to make the corresponding changes to the
> > ebuild.
> There's already a bug for this on Gentoo's tracker:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=524850
> I think that last comment by Greg Kubaryk about the ebuild bei
13 matches
Mail list logo
