I got:
title=gentoo linux 2.6.15-r1
root (hd0,4)
kernel=/vmlinuz-2.6.15-gentoo-r1 root=/dev/ram0 init=/linuxrc
real_root=/dev/mapper/nv_xxx7 dodmraid
initrd /initrd
On 6/26/06, Richard Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/26/06, Allan Spagnol Comar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tryed to dmraid
I don´t remember hte exactly name of the device but is
/dev/mapper/nv_xxx1 NTFS
/dev/mapper/nv_xxx2 NTFS
/dev/mapper/nv_xxx3 NTFS
/dev/mapper/nv_xxx5 ext2 boot
/dev/mapper/nv_xxx6 swap
/dev/mapper/nv_xxx7 reiserfs /
/dev/mapper/nv_xxx8 reiserfs /tmp
/dev/mapper/nv_xxx9 reiserfs /var
/dev/mapper/nv
On 6/26/06, Allan Spagnol Comar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I tryed to dmraid + 2.6.16 and all I got was that /dev/mapper/* was
empty ( just have control node ). I had try 2.6.15-r1 and /de/mapper
was populated
Populated...with what? How are you determining this? Have you hacked
up the initrd/
ok, I will keep it in one thread, but last one got "killed" or it look
like .. :(
in advance sorry.
On 6/26/06, Bo Ørsted Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 26 June 2006 14:24, Allan Spagnol Comar wrote:
> Hi all on the list; thanks for attention.
For the future when you want mor
On Monday 26 June 2006 14:24, Allan Spagnol Comar wrote:
> Hi all on the list; thanks for attention.
For the future when you want more attention, please keep it in the same
thread. It's not like we only notice new threads...
--
Bo Andresen
pgpubP2agmrF9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Monday 26 June 2006 20:28, Allan Spagnol Comar wrote:
> Hi I use a A8N-E, with nvidia raid controler 2 segate SATA disks
> working at RAID-0 ( sttriping ), I had installed gentoo base system
> and grub successfully, but at boot time with kernel 2.6.16 it cannot
> find device on /dev/mapper and w
Hi I use a A8N-E, with nvidia raid controler 2 segate SATA disks
working at RAID-0 ( sttriping ), I had installed gentoo base system
and grub successfully, but at boot time with kernel 2.6.16 it cannot
find device on /dev/mapper and with kernel 2.6.15-r1 it has a kernel
panic saiyng it can´t find
On Monday 26 June 2006 11:58, James Buckley wrote:
> He probably want's to use fakeraid because he wants to have a
> dual-boot Windows-Linux, both using raid. I also have had the same
> problem with 2.6.16+ dmraid, and the only solution I found was to use
> kernel 2.6.15-r9 (just < 2.6.16). Only 2.
Hi all on the list; thanks for attention. I need to use fake RAID
because of windows ( I had incresed in 80% the performance of windows
because of the fake raid :) ). I know linux software RAID is good, and
I had already used on a box running just linux, but I really need to
use dual boot on this
He probably want's to use fakeraid because he wants to have a dual-boot Windows-Linux, both using raid. I also have had the same problem with 2.6.16 + dmraid, and the only solution I found was to use kernel 2.6.15-r9 (just <
2.6.16). Only 2.6.15 gives me other problems...
On 26/06/06, Friedrich Gö
On 6/26/06, Catalin Trifu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why not use software RAID ? You don't necessarily need
the hardware RAID and as far as I know software RAID works just as
fine as the hardware RAID.
Hi,
Well, usually hardware raid is much better, at least if you want
raid5/6, for rai
Catalin Trifu wrote:
> Why not use software RAID ? You don't necessarily need
> the hardware RAID and as far as I know software RAID works just as
> fine as the hardware RAID.
Especially so, as those cheap "hardware" raids aren't hardware
RAID at all but just a software RAID. Why not use the
Why not use software RAID ? You don't necessarily need
the hardware RAID and as far as I know software RAID works just as
fine as the hardware RAID.
Catalin
Allan Spagnol Comar wrote:
> Good afternoon list.
>
> I am trying now for 8 days to make nvidia RAID works on gentoo
> systems; I
13 matches
Mail list logo