On 2014-11-26, Gevisz wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 22:02:49 + (UTC) Grant Edwards
> wrote:
>
>> On 2014-11-25, Maxim Wexler wrote:
>> >>
>> >> No. It is not possible in Unity or, at least, it was not possible
>> >> in Unity at the time when Ubuntu 12.04 was released. They really
>> >> *forc
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 03:46:06PM -0600, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> It sounds really cool Sabayon, I should probably try it one of these days.
I'd say it's my favorite distro. Sadly, equo still doesn't know how to
"depclean".
--
Nicolas Sebrecht
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Tom H wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 2:34 AM, Gevisz wrote:
>> On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 22:02:49 + (UTC) Grant Edwards
>> wrote:
>
>
>>> I prefer Gentoo over Ubuntu for a host of other reasons, but switching
>>> from Ubuntu to Gentoo just to get a different des
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 2:34 AM, Gevisz wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 22:02:49 + (UTC) Grant Edwards
> wrote:
>> I prefer Gentoo over Ubuntu for a host of other reasons, but switching
>> from Ubuntu to Gentoo just to get a different desktop seems like
>> overkill.
>
> Strange enough but acc
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> Some devs take this stuff too personally.
Only the devs? LOL
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 22:02:49 + (UTC) Grant Edwards
wrote:
> On 2014-11-25, Maxim Wexler wrote:
> >>
> >> No. It is not possible in Unity or, at least, it was not possible
> >> in Unity at the time when Ubuntu 12.04 was released. They really
> >> *forced* their users to accept the new place
On 2014-11-25, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 25/11/2014 18:35, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> On 2014-11-23, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>
>>> There is only the one that portage will happen to install should you not
>>> specify a preference.
>>
>> If "default" doesn't mean "what will happen should you not speci
On 2014-11-25, Maxim Wexler wrote:
>>
>> No. It is not possible in Unity or, at least, it was not possible
>> in Unity at the time when Ubuntu 12.04 was released. They really
>> *forced* their users to accept the new place of the closing window
>> frame button and have argued that it is more ergon
On 25/11/2014 18:35, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2014-11-23, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>> There is only the one that portage will happen to install should you not
>> specify a preference.
>
> If "default" doesn't mean "what will happen should you not specify a
> preference", then what _does_ "default
On 2014-11-23, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> There is only the one that portage will happen to install should you not
> specify a preference.
If "default" doesn't mean "what will happen should you not specify a
preference", then what _does_ "default" mean?
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwar
On 23/11/2014 23:45, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 11/23/2014 4:21 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> There is no such thing as the "default init system".
>>
>> There is only the one that portage will happen to install should you not
>> specify a preference.
>
> Lol!
>
> That is what I would call a 'default'..
On 11/23/2014 4:21 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> There is no such thing as the "default init system".
>
> There is only the one that portage will happen to install should you not
> specify a preference.
Lol!
That is what I would call a 'default'...
On 23/11/2014 22:25, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 11/23/2014 2:24 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> The current Gentoo policy is that maintainers cannot block other devs
>> from adding support for systemd/openrc/etc to their packages if they
>> lack such support. Gentoo policy does NOT require maintainers to
>
On 23/11/2014 20:35, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 11/23/2014 1:00 PM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 12:44:12PM -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
>>> Since OpenRC is the *default* - for now at least - it is *king*, and
>>> systemd is the red-headed step-child, and as such OpenRC is and will be
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 02:34:52PM -0600, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> Oh my. So it's the name of the project and (one) author? All the
> design and ideas behind it are irrelevant then?
>
> You just gave me the most perfect justification to never ever take you
> seriously in this subject.
>
> Go
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 10:35 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
> On Sun, 23 Nov 2014 15:25:07 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
>
> > > The current Gentoo policy is that maintainers cannot block other devs
> > > from adding support for systemd/openrc/etc to their packages if they
> > > lack such support. Gentoo
On Sun, 23 Nov 2014 15:25:07 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
> > The current Gentoo policy is that maintainers cannot block other devs
> > from adding support for systemd/openrc/etc to their packages if they
> > lack such support. Gentoo policy does NOT require maintainers to
> > support any particular i
On 11/23/2014 2:24 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> The current Gentoo policy is that maintainers cannot block other devs
> from adding support for systemd/openrc/etc to their packages if they
> lack such support. Gentoo policy does NOT require maintainers to
> support any particular init system.
>
> I
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
>
> Irrelevant. Since OpenRC is the default init system, any package that
> doesn't work properly with it would, by definition, be a bug that must
> be fixed - if the maintainer wants their package to be marked as
> stable/usable by 99.99% of gento
On 11/23/2014 1:00 PM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 12:44:12PM -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
>> Since OpenRC is the *default* - for now at least - it is *king*, and
>> systemd is the red-headed step-child, and as such OpenRC is and will be
>> 100% fully supported.
>>
>> With that in
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 12:44:12PM -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
> This is really an incorrect (and even borderline arrogant) answer...
>
> To answer the OPs question correctly...
>
> Since OpenRC is the *default* - for now at least - it is *king*, and
> systemd is the red-headed step-child, and as su
21 matches
Mail list logo
