[gentoo-user] Re: MASKED Tilde with no `arch' what does it mean

2010-03-15 Thread Harry Putnam
Neil Bothwick writes: > On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 22:34:41 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote: > >> Seriously, Do you know why emacs-24 is masked like that? >> >> What little I know of Ulrich Mueller is that he is quite a stalwart >> fellow and not much would get by him. I guess its just that its the >> cvs v

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: MASKED Tilde with no `arch' what does it mean

2010-03-15 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 22:34:41 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote: > Seriously, Do you know why emacs-24 is masked like that? > > What little I know of Ulrich Mueller is that he is quite a stalwart > fellow and not much would get by him. I guess its just that its the > cvs version eh? Yes, CVS ebuilds are

[gentoo-user] Re: MASKED Tilde with no `arch' what does it mean

2010-03-14 Thread Harry Putnam
Neil Bothwick writes: > On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 18:19:03 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote: > >> Ok, fine but first I want to find out what the unexplained tilde >> means. There are only a handfull of packagew with that notation in the >> masked file... where do look to find out its meaning? > > Try man 5 eb

[gentoo-user] Re: MASKED Tilde with no `arch' what does it mean

2010-03-14 Thread »Q«
On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 18:19:03 -0500 Harry Putnam wrote: > Ok, fine but first I want to find out what the unexplained tilde > means. There are only a handfull of packagew with that notation in the > masked file... where do look to find out its meaning? ~category/package-version denotes all revisi