Rich Freeman gentoo.org> writes:
> Don't get me wrong - I appreciate the desire for bare-metal
> performance in the high-performance computing world. I've heard
> stories/rumors of Gentoo getting attention elsewhere in this domain,
> and we have a disproportionate number of physical scientists
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:29 PM, James wrote:
> Rich Freeman gentoo.org> writes:
>> > for (BS) Big Science, imho. BS needs all resources solving and
>> > supporting a single problem, with as low of latency as possible.
>
>> What kind of latency are you expecting to get with Gentoo running on
>>
Rich Freeman gentoo.org> writes:
> > for (BS) Big Science, imho. BS needs all resources solving and
> > supporting a single problem, with as low of latency as possible.
> What kind of latency are you expecting to get with Gentoo running on
> CoreOS? A process inside a container is no differe
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 3:28 PM, James wrote:
> You are right and you are wrong:: Openstack nor CoreOS are the best approach
> for (BS) Big Science, imho. BS needs all resources solving and supporting a
> single problem, with as low of latency as possible.
What kind of latency are you expecting t
Rich Freeman gentoo.org> writes:
> > Besides, if I want to deploy 50 systems for a cluster, one at a time in
> > parallel what do you recommend? via handbook? The modern diversity of
> > hardware options has rendered the gentoo handbook, dysfunctional,
> > at best, imho. ymmv.
> I have mixed f
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:39 AM, James wrote:
> Dale gmail.com> writes:
>
> Besides, if I want to deploy 50 systems for a cluster, one at a time in
> parallel what do you recommend? via handbook? The modern diversity of
> hardware options has rendered the gentoo handbook, dysfunctional, at best,
Dale gmail.com> writes:
> > Blueness is a wonderful and collegial type of dev
> > and is currently seeking input on his 'alpha' ideas::
> > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:RelEng_GRS
His work is progressing and there are (3) major versions just
posted to gentoo-dev.
> So this is to crea
James wrote:
> Dale gmail.com> writes:
>
>
>> James wrote:
>>> What I really would appreciate is some feedback on the Planning
>>> Questions listed below, as to help folks organized their thoughts and
>>> hardware details BEFORE actually performing an install or test-drive.
>
>>> Many/most of the
Jeremi Piotrowski gmail.com> writes:
> Planning questions are an OK-ish idea, but I surely wouldn't link to
> derivative distributions to answer them. We have appropriate wiki pages
> for all options, those that are insufficient should be improved. These
> could be linked to so that people know w
Dale gmail.com> writes:
> James wrote:
> > What I really would appreciate is some feedback on the Planning
> > Questions listed below, as to help folks organized their thoughts and
> > hardware details BEFORE actually performing an install or test-drive.
> > Many/most of these options exist
10 matches
Mail list logo
