On 2007-01-04, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> thanks, nice to have some terminal ouput sent along to
> substantiate this discussion! i like the 'mem window' a lot.
> top is cool...
VMS used to have a very cool program that would watch the
address space of a specified process. It displayed a "
On 2007-01-04, Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Throughout this thread many people have commented on audacious
>>> being a resource hog of monumental proportions. Every single
>>> one of them is wrong and this myth really needs to be
>>> debunked. Here's why:
>>
>> I agree. I'm still u
On 2007-01-03, Hans-Werner Hilse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> You don't think that 58M of virtual memory usage isn't a
>> resource hog when the X server only requires 56M and the next
>> largest program is 32M? Virtual memory _is_ a resource,
>> though not an expensive one.
>
> Errrm, to get bac
Hi,
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007 15:27:41 + (UTC) Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The X server is using 56M of virtual memory with 33M resident
> and 10M shared. Audacious is using 58M of with 14M resident
> and 10M shared.
"possibly" shared, to be exact. Whether it actually _is_ shared is
On 2007-01-03, Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 January 2007 15:17, Nelson, David (ED, PAR&D) wrote:
>
>> I moved to amarok, I might give audacious a shot.
>>
>> What about noatun for a smallish player? Not sure on it's RAM usage.
>> Also look at Quod Libet or Banshee whic
On Friday 29 December 2006 14:42, Mick wrote:
> I'm missing xmms too. I hope xmms2 will eventually be developed enough to
> use as a stable package, but without the bloatware that winamp has become.
xmms2 is nothing like the first version. It is a client / daemon setup really.
Few users of xmms
On 2006-12-29, Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
how about media-sound/audacious ?
its a nice and lightweight player.
>>>
>>> Lightweight??
>>>
>>> It's the biggest virtual memory user on my system with a
>>> virtial set size of 58M and resident set size of 14M. The only
>>> thing with a
On Friday 29 December 2006 18:50, Mark M wrote:
> On 12/29/06, Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2006-12-29, Mark M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > how about media-sound/audacious ?
> > > its a nice and lightweight player.
> >
> > Lightweight??
> >
> > It's the biggest virtual memory
On 2006-12-29, Ryan Crisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> He may have meant lightweight as in easy to use. And compared
> to mplayer it is lightweight on the memory side.
On my system mplayer uses about 1/3 the memory that audacious
does, but that's the non-gui version of mplayer -- I don't
think
He may have meant lightweight as in easy to use. And compared to mplayer it
is lightweight on the memory side.
On 12/29/06, Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2006-12-29, Mark M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> how about media-sound/audacious ?
> its a nice and lightweight player.
Light
On 12/29/06, Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2006-12-29, Mark M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> how about media-sound/audacious ?
> its a nice and lightweight player.
Lightweight??
It's the biggest virtual memory user on my system with a
virtial set size of 58M and resident set size
On 2006-12-29, Mark M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> how about media-sound/audacious ?
> its a nice and lightweight player.
Lightweight??
It's the biggest virtual memory user on my system with a
virtial set size of 58M and resident set size of 14M. The only
thing with a slightly larger resident s
12 matches
Mail list logo
