Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
Hi,
On Monday, 12. September 2011 10:40:02 Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
So, what's the good way to fix all that mess? Certainly not moving most
of software to /. Fortunately, we can expect /usr to be mounted before
udev starts via the initramfs.
That's *your* opinion.
Hi,
On Monday, 12. September 2011 10:40:02 Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> The 09/09/11, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
> > The question arose, when Canek mentioned bluetoothd, that udev seems to
> > need in some cases.
>
> This is wrong.
> udev on its own does not require extra tools from /usr.
> Thoug
The 09/09/11, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
> The question arose, when Canek mentioned bluetoothd, that udev seems to need
> in some cases.
This is wrong. udev on its own does not require extra tools from /usr.
Though, the rules used by udev do use software in /usr. It's NOT a udev
fault _at all
Am Freitag, 9. September 2011, 10:06:21 schrieb Nicolas Sebrecht:
> The 09/09/11, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 8. September 2011, 23:44:41 schrieb Alan McKinnon:
> > > On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 21:29:40 +
> > >
> > > Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > > > Would it not be possible to have
The 09/09/11, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 8. September 2011, 23:44:41 schrieb Alan McKinnon:
> > On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 21:29:40 +
> >
> > Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > > Would it not be possible to have a minimal /usr tree in the root
> > > partition for udev's use at boot time, a
Alberto Luaces writes:
> Neil Bothwick writes:
>
>> On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 19:04:17 -0400, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>>
>>> > Putting it on a logical volume is one advantage, allowing /usr to be
>>> > resized should the need arise.
>>>
>>> Why not allow / to be resized entirely? You probably will
Neil Bothwick writes:
> On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 19:04:17 -0400, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>
>> > Putting it on a logical volume is one advantage, allowing /usr to be
>> > resized should the need arise.
>>
>> Why not allow / to be resized entirely? You probably will take the
>> machine off-line anyw
On Friday 19 August 2011, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 08/18/2011 10:08 PM, András Csányi wrote:
> > On 18 August 2011 18:59, wrote:
> >> Hi, guys
> >>
> >> It is a shame, I know, but after several years using Gentoo, it is
> >> the first time I try to build a kernel without "genkernel".
> >>
>
On 08/18/2011 10:08 PM, András Csányi wrote:
On 18 August 2011 18:59, wrote:
Hi, guys
It is a shame, I know, but after several years using Gentoo, it is the first
time I try to build a kernel without "genkernel".
And now I can't boot to that new kernel, it does not find (and really do not
hav
9 matches
Mail list logo