Frédéric,
Working fast here to get to other things I need to finish...
Thank you very much for the additional clarity hee -- I may have to try
a vanilla to see how tht works, and thn apply the patches forward until
it re-breaks.
Thank you!,
rgh.
Frédéric Grosshans wrote:
Le jeudi 14 avril 2005 à
Working fast here to get to other things I need to finish...
I read everything here, & I thank you very much for the extra info -- I
may be using this in the next few minutes!
Backquotes deprecated, huh...? Ok, we'll see how that "plays in Peoria"
for what uses...
thanks,
rgh.
Nick Rout wrote:
Le jeudi 14 avril 2005 à 15:17 -0400, Trey Gruel a écrit :
> On 4/14/05, Robert G. Hays <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ok, is:
> > kernel-2.6.11-gentoo-r4
> > the same as:
> > kernel-2.6.11.4
> > plus/minus the Gentoo-specific patches?
>
> possibly not. the gentoo-sources package
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 18:36:50 -0400
Robert G. Hays wrote:
>
>
>
> <...derivations...> That is, which
> kernel.org kernel-w.x.y.z
> did which
> gentoo kernel-w.x.y-gentoo-rz
> come from, then get patched, and with which patches.
Oh and by the way if you just want the sources that Linu
Nick Rout wrote:
ok, now that i've rebooted windoze again and email is -maybe- working
again, i'll finish that email. doe anybody know where i might find the
kernel-derivations and maybe patches?
What do you mean derivations?
The patches for any gentoo kernel set are usually
genpatches-${K
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 16:06:46 -0400
Robert G. Hays wrote:
> ok, now that i've rebooted windoze again and email is -maybe- working
> again, i'll finish that email. doe anybody know where i might find the
> kernel-derivations and maybe patches?
>
> thanks,
> rgh
What do you mean derivations?
T
ok, now that i've rebooted windoze again and email is -maybe- working
again, i'll finish that email. doe anybody know where i might find the
kernel-derivations and maybe patches?
thanks,
rgh.
Robert G. Hays wrote:
Trey Thank You.
That didn't make things easier, but at least I know so I don't s
Trey Thank You.
That didn't make things easier, but at least I know so I don't step off
a cliff (and i ain't no cartoon-character neither) by making a bad
assumption about the kernel. There are one or two obvious things I can
do, although they do take serious time. Sigh. I gotta think about
On 4/14/05, Robert G. Hays <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, is:
> kernel-2.6.11-gentoo-r4
> the same as:
> kernel-2.6.11.4
> plus/minus the Gentoo-specific patches?
possibly not. the gentoo-sources package has its own revision numbers
(the -r* bit). that's not saying that the ch
Post-script:& if I do go to the kernel.org kernel, what is going to
change, and what will I have to do about it/them, and what, if anything,
is just going to --stay-- broke/different?
Thanks again!,
rgh.
Robert G. Hays wrote:
Ok, is:
kernel-2.6.11-gentoo-r4
the same as:
kernel-2.6
Ok, is:
kernel-2.6.11-gentoo-r4
the same as:
kernel-2.6.11.4
plus/minus the Gentoo-specific patches?
I'm dying here fighting to get my ATI all-in-wonder agp8x Dual-Screen
working under 'gento-r4 with Win4Lin. (will need 3D, so using ATI's
drivers.)
I got the ATI & Gentoo to play n
11 matches
Mail list logo
