Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 08:47:41 -0600, Dale wrote:
It's keyworded, but not masked. The recommendation, for ~arch users,
is that you have it installed but leave 2.6 as the default.
It shows this here:
[M~] dev-lang/python-3.1.1-r1 (3.1)
Isn't that masked and k
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 08:47:41 -0600, Dale wrote:
> > It's keyworded, but not masked. The recommendation, for ~arch users,
> > is that you have it installed but leave 2.6 as the default.
> It shows this here:
>
> [M~] dev-lang/python-3.1.1-r1 (3.1)
>
> Isn't that masked and keyworded? I'm x86 he
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 06:41:02 -0600, Dale wrote:
And they devs have done so. Python 3 is masked and even keyworded. It
is a hint at least.
It's keyworded, but not masked. The recommendation, for ~arch users, is
that you have it installed but leave 2.6 as the defa
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 06:41:02 -0600, Dale wrote:
> And they devs have done so. Python 3 is masked and even keyworded. It
> is a hint at least.
It's keyworded, but not masked. The recommendation, for ~arch users, is
that you have it installed but leave 2.6 as the default.
--
Neil Bothwick
Ag
Dale a écrit :
> Albert Hopkins wrote:
>>
>> If it were
>> buggy the Gentoo devs would have masked it for you ;-)
>>
>>
>> -a
>>
>
> And they devs have done so. Python 3 is masked and even keyworded. It
> is a hint at least.
>
> Dale
>
> :-) :-)
Thanks all for your answers. Anyway, is the
Albert Hopkins wrote:
If it were
buggy the Gentoo devs would have masked it for you ;-)
-a
And they devs have done so. Python 3 is masked and even keyworded. It
is a hint at least.
Dale
:-) :-)
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 10:28 +0100, Xavier Parizet wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I eard [sic] some (long) time ago that portage is not compatible with python
> 2.7, so i
> masked it (python) in /etc/portage/package.mask. What i would like to know now
> is is portage now compatible with this version of pyt
On Monday 07 December 2009 11:28:07 Xavier Parizet wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I eard some (long) time ago that portage is not compatible with python 2.7,
> so i masked it (python) in /etc/portage/package.mask. What i would like to
> know now is is portage now compatible with this version of python ?
Hi list,
I eard some (long) time ago that portage is not compatible with python 2.7, so i
masked it (python) in /etc/portage/package.mask. What i would like to know now
is is portage now compatible with this version of python ? Or if not, where can
i follow the status of this compatibility ? I loo
9 matches
Mail list logo