Re: [gentoo-user] Python 2.7 support

2009-12-07 Thread Dale
Neil Bothwick wrote: On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 08:47:41 -0600, Dale wrote: It's keyworded, but not masked. The recommendation, for ~arch users, is that you have it installed but leave 2.6 as the default. It shows this here: [M~] dev-lang/python-3.1.1-r1 (3.1) Isn't that masked and k

Re: [gentoo-user] Python 2.7 support

2009-12-07 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 08:47:41 -0600, Dale wrote: > > It's keyworded, but not masked. The recommendation, for ~arch users, > > is that you have it installed but leave 2.6 as the default. > It shows this here: > > [M~] dev-lang/python-3.1.1-r1 (3.1) > > Isn't that masked and keyworded? I'm x86 he

Re: [gentoo-user] Python 2.7 support

2009-12-07 Thread Dale
Neil Bothwick wrote: On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 06:41:02 -0600, Dale wrote: And they devs have done so. Python 3 is masked and even keyworded. It is a hint at least. It's keyworded, but not masked. The recommendation, for ~arch users, is that you have it installed but leave 2.6 as the defa

Re: [gentoo-user] Python 2.7 support

2009-12-07 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 06:41:02 -0600, Dale wrote: > And they devs have done so. Python 3 is masked and even keyworded. It > is a hint at least. It's keyworded, but not masked. The recommendation, for ~arch users, is that you have it installed but leave 2.6 as the default. -- Neil Bothwick Ag

Re: [gentoo-user] Python 2.7 support

2009-12-07 Thread Xavier Parizet
Dale a écrit : > Albert Hopkins wrote: >> >> If it were >> buggy the Gentoo devs would have masked it for you ;-) >> >> >> -a >> > > And they devs have done so. Python 3 is masked and even keyworded. It > is a hint at least. > > Dale > > :-) :-) Thanks all for your answers. Anyway, is the

Re: [gentoo-user] Python 2.7 support

2009-12-07 Thread Dale
Albert Hopkins wrote: If it were buggy the Gentoo devs would have masked it for you ;-) -a And they devs have done so. Python 3 is masked and even keyworded. It is a hint at least. Dale :-) :-)

Re: [gentoo-user] Python 2.7 support

2009-12-07 Thread Albert Hopkins
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 10:28 +0100, Xavier Parizet wrote: > Hi list, > > I eard [sic] some (long) time ago that portage is not compatible with python > 2.7, so i > masked it (python) in /etc/portage/package.mask. What i would like to know now > is is portage now compatible with this version of pyt

Re: [gentoo-user] Python 2.7 support

2009-12-07 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Monday 07 December 2009 11:28:07 Xavier Parizet wrote: > Hi list, > > I eard some (long) time ago that portage is not compatible with python 2.7, > so i masked it (python) in /etc/portage/package.mask. What i would like to > know now is is portage now compatible with this version of python ?

[gentoo-user] Python 2.7 support

2009-12-07 Thread Xavier Parizet
Hi list, I eard some (long) time ago that portage is not compatible with python 2.7, so i masked it (python) in /etc/portage/package.mask. What i would like to know now is is portage now compatible with this version of python ? Or if not, where can i follow the status of this compatibility ? I loo