On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 12:58:32 +0100
Mateusz Mierzwinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have problem with postfix. I just want to send email to other mail
> server from my new postfix/courier server.
Could you elaborate on your configuration? Are you...
- relaying mail to a specific
James Homuth wrote:
At 06:58 AM 29/01/2008, you wrote:
Hello,
I have problem with postfix. I just want to send email to other mail
server from my new postfix/courier server. Every time I write address
different then local server (postfix) returns info "5.7.1 (some
address): Relay access deni
At 06:58 AM 29/01/2008, you wrote:
Hello,
I have problem with postfix. I just want to send email to other mail
server from my new postfix/courier server. Every time I write
address different then local server (postfix) returns info "5.7.1
(some address): Relay access denied". What should I do
Hello,
I have problem with postfix. I just want to send email to other mail
server from my new postfix/courier server. Every time I write address
different then local server (postfix) returns info "5.7.1 (some
address): Relay access denied". What should I do? I don't know is it
forwarding or
Hi Neil,
on Thursday, 2005-05-12 at 22:18:23, you wrote:
> I'm running ~amd64 and ~ppc. I don't know if it's in the older
> baselayout, but there are a lot of differences between testing and stable
> baselayouts.
My RC_NET_STRICT_CHECKING had been set to "no" already, and I don't have support
for
On Thu, 12 May 2005 13:17:11 -0700, Richard Fish wrote:
> What version of baselayout are you using? On my system, neither
> /sbin/runscript.sh nor /etc/init.d/runscript.sh shows support for the
> "none" or "lo" options. Is this only available in ~x86?
I'm running ~amd64 and ~ppc. I don't know i
Neil Bothwick wrote:
>On Thu, 12 May 2005 07:22:48 -0700, Richard Fish wrote:
>
>
>
>>>See RC_NET_STRICT_CHECKING in /etc/conf.d/rc.
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>>AFAICT, NET_STRICT_CHECKING will not help. If set to "yes", it requires
>>all net.* scripts to be successfully started for the net dependa
On Thu, 12 May 2005 07:22:48 -0700, Richard Fish wrote:
> >See RC_NET_STRICT_CHECKING in /etc/conf.d/rc.
> AFAICT, NET_STRICT_CHECKING will not help. If set to "yes", it requires
> all net.* scripts to be successfully started for the net dependancy to
> be satisifed. If set to "no", it requires
Edward Catmur wrote:
>On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 12:17 +0200, Matthias Bethke wrote:
>
>
>>I also haven't figured out *how* the "net" dependency is provided. The
>>postfix iniscript explicitely contains "provide mta", but very few
>>scripts use this provide keyword, especially not net.*
>>On my prev
On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 12:17 +0200, Matthias Bethke wrote:
> I also haven't figured out *how* the "net" dependency is provided. The
> postfix iniscript explicitely contains "provide mta", but very few
> scripts use this provide keyword, especially not net.*
> On my previous SuSE system, if I went s
Hiya,
Take a look in /etc/conf.d/rc
---
# Set to "yes" if the default behaviour of at least one net.*
# service starting beside net.lo is NOT enouth to consider
# the 'net' dependency up and running.
RC_NET_STRICT_CHECKING="no"
---
Matthias Bethke wrote:
I have a fee
I have a feeling I'm missing something very obvious here, but I'm still
at a loss:
I have my laptop's ethernet set to use DHCP. Obviously, on the road this
will fail. But then the "net" service that postfix (and a bunch of other
stuff like sshd) depends on is not there. Of course I could edit the
12 matches
Mail list logo
