On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 00:49:37 -0800
"Bryan Whitehead" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> if it is from the gentoo guys, I find it less annoying than the
> default editor being nano instead of vi... :)
yeah, no kidding.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
I'm pretty sure those changes are from the kernel devs - you would
need to ask the lkml people.
if it is from the gentoo guys, I find it less annoying than the
default editor being nano instead of vi... :)
On Nov 13, 2007 11:21 PM, Walter Dnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been running Gent
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 10:55:54PM -0800, Bryan Whitehead wrote
> I don't see what the big deal is - you are choosing to do everything
> manually by running gentoo and compiling your own kernel. If you don't
> like having to learn things like this why not use Ubuntu or Fedora?
I've been running
On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 23:35 -0500, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 10:53:52AM -0600, Michael Sullivan wrote
> > On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 15:40 +0200, Daniel Iliev wrote:
> > >
> > > I believe your problem comes from:
> > >
> > > # CONFIG_IP_NF_CONNTRACK_SUPPORT is not set
> > >
> > >
I don't see what the big deal is - you are choosing to do everything
manually by running gentoo and compiling your own kernel. If you don't
like having to learn things like this why not use Ubuntu or Fedora?
On Nov 12, 2007 8:35 PM, Walter Dnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 10:53:52AM -0600, Michael Sullivan wrote
> On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 15:40 +0200, Daniel Iliev wrote:
> >
> > I believe your problem comes from:
> >
> > # CONFIG_IP_NF_CONNTRACK_SUPPORT is not set
> >
> > Build this module and try again.
> >
> This option isn't even availab
Dan Farrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does anybody actually _use_ ipv6 ?
Yes!
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 14:50:56 +0100
Benno Schulenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And if you use IPv6, then this one too. But if you don't absolutely
> need IPv6, better switch all support for it off, just because it is
> less confusing that way.
Does anybody actually _use_ ipv6 ?
--
[EMAIL P
On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 15:40 +0200, Daniel Iliev wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 06:53:42 -0600
> Michael Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have a big problem. I've asked this question here in the past, and
> > have never gotten a straight answer. I use ipkungfu as my firewall
> > sofware.
Michael Sullivan wrote:
> # CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_IPV4 is not set
This should be switched on.
> # CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_IPV6 is not set
And if you use IPv6, then this one too. But if you don't absolutely
need IPv6, better switch all support for it off, just because it is
less confusing that way.
On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 06:53:42 -0600
Michael Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a big problem. I've asked this question here in the past, and
> have never gotten a straight answer. I use ipkungfu as my firewall
> sofware. I noticed yesterday when I had to reboot my server box that
> ipk
I have a big problem. I've asked this question here in the past, and
have never gotten a straight answer. I use ipkungfu as my firewall
sofware. I noticed yesterday when I had to reboot my server box that
ipkungfu wasn't starting.
baby ~ # /etc/init.d/ipkungfu restart
* Starting ipkungfu ...
12 matches
Mail list logo
