On Wednesday 23 April 2008, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 23:07:02 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > > So, mkreiserfs --label My_Home /dev/hda5 will not wipe out my
> > > partition, right? I don't want to cause unnecessary harm to my
> > > machine . . .
> >
> > Of course it will wipe th
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 23:07:02 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > So, mkreiserfs --label My_Home /dev/hda5 will not wipe out my
> > partition, right? I don't want to cause unnecessary harm to my
> > machine . . .
>
> Of course it will wipe the partition, that's what mkreiserfs does.
Reading that b
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 08:25:11 +0100, Mick wrote:
> So, mkreiserfs --label My_Home /dev/hda5 will not wipe out my
> partition, right? I don't want to cause unnecessary harm to my
> machine . . .
Of course it will wipe the partition, that's what mkreiserfs does. The
--label option simply adds a lab
On Wednesday 23 April 2008, Mick wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 April 2008, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > Yep. I use e2label. Works fine with ext2 and ext3 partitions. One
> > command to read the label, another to write it. Easy.
>
> So, mkreiserfs --label My_Home /dev/hda5 will not wipe out my
> partition, rig
On Wednesday 23 April 2008, Mark Knecht wrote:
> Yep. I use e2label. Works fine with ext2 and ext3 partitions. One
> command to read the label, another to write it. Easy.
So, mkreiserfs --label My_Home /dev/hda5 will not wipe out my partition,
right? I don't want to cause unnecessary harm to my
On Wednesday 23 April 2008, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 12:40 AM, Alan McKinnon
> > Personally, I prefer labels over other disk id methods. I get to
> > choose the label myself and can ensure they are unique in my world
> > (but maybe not in the universe like UUIDs are). If I ha
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 12:40 AM, Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 22 April 2008, Mick wrote:
> > On Monday 21 April 2008, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:41:58 +0200, Dirk
On Tuesday 22 April 2008, Mick wrote:
> On Monday 21 April 2008, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:41:58 +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> > > > The other possible way would be to give your devices unique
> >
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Monday 21 April 2008, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:41:58 +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> > > > The other possible way would be
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 22:43:12 +0100, Mick wrote:
> I have thought about using labels, but never really ventured into it (I
> think I tried it once on a server). Can I do it retrospectively on
> ext2, reiserfs and xfs, or is it going to erase the contents of the
> partition?
You can, see the man p
On Monday 21 April 2008, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:41:58 +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> > > The other possible way would be to give your devices unique names,
> > > either via udev or by using LVM. Adv
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:41:58 +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
>
> > The other possible way would be to give your devices unique names,
> > either via udev or by using LVM. Advantage over UUIDs: much easier to
> > read.
>
>
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:41:58 +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> The other possible way would be to give your devices unique names,
> either via udev or by using LVM. Advantage over UUIDs: much easier to
> read.
Or you could use filesystem labels.
--
Neil Bothwick
Electricians DO IT until it Hz...
Am Montag, den 21.04.2008, 16:37 +0200 schrieb Anthony E. Caudel:
> I have noticed in some distros (namely Ubuntu) that the fstab uses
> UUID's rather than /dev references. Is this a better way?
Yes.
> Does it eliminate the problem of /dev references changing when another
> drive, i.e., an ext
I have noticed in some distros (namely Ubuntu) that the fstab uses
UUID's rather than /dev references. Is this a better way?
Does it eliminate the problem of /dev references changing when another
drive, i.e., an external USB drive, is plugged in? The /dev references
may change but the UUID's
15 matches
Mail list logo