On 03/21/2015 02:46 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>
> Could you run this immediately after booting:
>
> systemd-delta
>
> Just to check that the unit files you are using are not being overridden
> by something.
>
OK, I've confirmed the poweroff target works fine but the reboot and
shutdown ta
On 03/21/2015 02:46 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>
> They are; basically everything nowadays is systemd aware. Even OpenRC
> can now use some of its configurations.
>
> Could you run this immediately after booting:
>
> systemd-delta
I've finally gotten around to doing this:
--
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Daniel Frey wrote:
[...]
> I was using genkernel, but it was whining about not supporting systemd,
> so I tried dracut for the first time.
>
> However, the initramfs created by genkernel has the same issue.
>
> I didn't do any special configuation of dracut, I read
On 03/21/2015 10:27 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>>
>> So why does `systemctl reboot` not want to work? I'm a little confused.
>
> What kind of initramfs are you using? Supposedly, the only difference
> between poweroff and reboot is that the former turns off the machine and
> reboot does a res
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Daniel Frey wrote:
>
> I also noticed this in the USE flags for systemd:
> - - sysv-utils : Install sysvinit compatibility
> symlinks and manpages for init, telinit, halt, poweroff, reboot,
> runlevel, and shutdown
>
> Should I enable that USE f
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Daniel Frey wrote:
> Hi list,
Hi.
> In one of my earlier posts I mentioned I wasn't having any issues with
> systemd. Well, I guess I lied, although I didn't know about it at the
time.
>
> My laptop works fine, no issues.
>
> My desktop, however, has an issue, b
Hi list,
In one of my earlier posts I mentioned I wasn't having any issues with
systemd. Well, I guess I lied, although I didn't know about it at the time.
My laptop works fine, no issues.
My desktop, however, has an issue, but only while rebooting. I use mdadm
to access my IMSM raid, and during
>> I noticed amavisd-new is being pulled in by the "filter" USE flag in
>> squirrelmail. I don't use amavisd-new (I greylist), so I removed
>> filter from make.conf and then realized it is also used in the php
>> package. I only use php with squirrelmail. Is it safe for me to
>> remove the filte
Grant a écrit :
> I noticed amavisd-new is being pulled in by the "filter" USE flag in
> squirrelmail. I don't use amavisd-new (I greylist), so I removed
> filter from make.conf and then realized it is also used in the php
> package. I only use php with squirrelmail. Is it safe for me to
> remov
Grant wrote:
> I noticed amavisd-new is being pulled in by the "filter" USE flag in
> squirrelmail. I don't use amavisd-new (I greylist), so I removed
> filter from make.conf and then realized it is also used in the php
> package. I only use php with squirrelmail. Is it safe for me to
> remove
I noticed amavisd-new is being pulled in by the "filter" USE flag in
squirrelmail. I don't use amavisd-new (I greylist), so I removed
filter from make.conf and then realized it is also used in the php
package. I only use php with squirrelmail. Is it safe for me to
remove the filter USE flag from
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 07:11:05PM +0200, Penguin Lover Alan McKinnon squawked:
> On Sunday 13 July 2008, Mick wrote:
> > Anyway, as others asked - how long is too long for this purpose?
>
> for obvious reasons, anything longer than 80 characters
>
Just to be pedantic:
Remember that the mailing
On Sunday 13 July 2008, Mick wrote:
> Anyway, as others asked - how long is too long for this purpose?
for obvious reasons, anything longer than 80 characters
--
Alan McKinnon
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Sunday 13 July 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 10:40:08AM -0700, maxim wexler wrote:
> > I would like to raise my voice against the use of overly long subject
> > lines that run out of space on the line provided.
> >
> > Complete sentences are not necessary. A few, well
re there, unfortunately, there is more the one pre
message, which causes the confusion:
for example:
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] OK, now this is weird-- where are the subjects?
Subject: [gentoo-user]
I guess that something wrong with the list software.
regards
pshemko
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Holly Bostick wrote:
Now I just replied to a message with a subject, and my reply has no
subject??!!
I don't even know if this will have a subject.
What could be going on?
*BuRP*
Sorry, I was hungry. :)
I don't know what's going on, but I've been seeing subject-less messages
for the past several h
Now I just replied to a message with a subject, and my reply has no
subject??!!
I don't even know if this will have a subject.
What could be going on?
Holly
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
17 matches
Mail list logo
