On Friday, 26 July 2019 16:49:25 BST Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 11:32 AM YUE Daian wrote:
> > I switched to a faster NTP server. It still takes some seconds but
> > better than before.
> >
> > Maybe you are right. Having correct system time is more important than
> > several se
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 11:32 AM YUE Daian wrote:
>
> I switched to a faster NTP server. It still takes some seconds but
> better than before.
>
> Maybe you are right. Having correct system time is more important than
> several seconds...
You're never going to make NTP fast unless you're using a
On 2019-07-26 17:15, Ralph Seichter wrote:
> * YUE Daian:
>
>> I added [ntp-client] to the default boot level (OpenRC), however it
>> seriously slows down the boot process (around 10 seconds or so).
>
> Launching 'clamd' can hold up a reboot for a minute or longer, so ten
> seconds do not seem tha
On 2019-07-26 15:55, Mick wrote:
> On Friday, 26 July 2019 15:23:11 BST YUE Daian wrote:
>> On 2019-07-26 09:30, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>> > On Friday, 26 July 2019 05:36:29 BST YUE Daian wrote:
>> >> Hi folks,
>> >>
>> >> I use ntp-client to synchronize the date/time of my Gentoo system.
>> >>
* YUE Daian:
> I added [ntp-client] to the default boot level (OpenRC), however it
> seriously slows down the boot process (around 10 seconds or so).
Launching 'clamd' can hold up a reboot for a minute or longer, so ten
seconds do not seem that bad to me.
> Is there any way to make it faster?
P
On Friday, 26 July 2019 15:23:11 BST YUE Daian wrote:
> On 2019-07-26 09:30, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Friday, 26 July 2019 05:36:29 BST YUE Daian wrote:
> >> Hi folks,
> >>
> >> I use ntp-client to synchronize the date/time of my Gentoo system.
> >>
> >> I added it to the default boot level
On 2019-07-26 09:30, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Friday, 26 July 2019 05:36:29 BST YUE Daian wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I use ntp-client to synchronize the date/time of my Gentoo system.
>>
>> I added it to the default boot level (OpenRC), however it seriously
>> slows down the boot process (aroun
On Friday, 26 July 2019 05:36:29 BST YUE Daian wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I use ntp-client to synchronize the date/time of my Gentoo system.
>
> I added it to the default boot level (OpenRC), however it seriously
> slows down the boot process (around 10 seconds or so).
>
> Is there any way to make i
Hi folks,
I use ntp-client to synchronize the date/time of my Gentoo system.
I added it to the default boot level (OpenRC), however it seriously
slows down the boot process (around 10 seconds or so).
Is there any way to make it faster? Or am I using the wrong service?
Thanks in advance!
Danny
Good afternoon all,
Does anyone have any inside knowledge as to why 5.9.5 of KDE plasma
desktop did not require ntp whereas 5.10.5 does? I use Openntp and been
using KDE 5 for ages with the time being correct so was wondering why
now the requirement for net-misc/ntp specifically.
A
[Sorry if this not entirely coherent: it's growing late here.]
On Wednesday 03 April 2013 22:45:11 Mick wrote:
> Do you have chronyc set up to signal off/online status to chronyd? If
> so, where do you run it from?
No, I don't need to bother with manual control: it just works for me. I did
pla
On Wednesday 03 Apr 2013 16:41:14 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 April 2013 00:36:00 Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> > I always used net-misc/ntp for syncing time.
> >
> > Now I found net-misc/chrony and set it up looks good so far.
> >
> > Any opinions and experiences on the various
On Wednesday 03 April 2013 00:36:00 Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> I always used net-misc/ntp for syncing time.
>
> Now I found net-misc/chrony and set it up looks good so far.
>
> Any opinions and experiences on the various ways of getting THE TIME?
I've been using chrony for years now. It
On Wednesday 03 Apr 2013 11:38:56 Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 03.04.2013 12:21, schrieb Marc Stürmer:
> > Just two different hammers for the same nail.
>
> Sure. I just like the quicker syncing/adjusting of chrony.
>
> > Another alternative is
> > OpenNTPD btw, http://www.openntpd.org/
>
>
Am 03.04.2013 12:21, schrieb Marc Stürmer:
> Just two different hammers for the same nail.
Sure. I just like the quicker syncing/adjusting of chrony.
> Another alternative is
> OpenNTPD btw, http://www.openntpd.org/
I will have a look as well ;-)
Thanks, Stefan
Am 03.04.2013 01:36, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
I always used net-misc/ntp for syncing time.
Now I found net-misc/chrony and set it up looks good so far.
Any opinions and experiences on the various ways of getting THE TIME?
Just two different hammers for the same nail. Another altern
Am 03.04.2013 10:28, schrieb Nilesh Govindrajan:
> On Wednesday 03 April 2013 05:06:00 AM IST, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>>
>> I always used net-misc/ntp for syncing time.
>>
>> Now I found net-misc/chrony and set it up looks good so far.
>>
>> Any opinions and experiences on the various way
On Wednesday 03 April 2013 05:06:00 AM IST, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
> I always used net-misc/ntp for syncing time.
>
> Now I found net-misc/chrony and set it up looks good so far.
>
> Any opinions and experiences on the various ways of getting THE TIME?
>
> Stefan
>
I use busybox :D
I always used net-misc/ntp for syncing time.
Now I found net-misc/chrony and set it up looks good so far.
Any opinions and experiences on the various ways of getting THE TIME?
Stefan
Hi folks
The problem is solved now. Actually, a BIOS upgrade solved the problem.
Details:
The board is a Asus A3M78-Pro with a AMD 5050e Athlon64 Dual core CPU. Bios
version was V0902 with with it was originally shipped.
Asus bios notes for that board say that with Version 11xx a bug was fixed
Am Montag 26 Oktober 2009 16:23:11 schrieb Jil Larner:
> Hi,
>
> Alexander Puchmayr a écrit :
> > I think I have a problem with the system time, which is considerable too
> > slow. It looses about 3 seconds every 20 minutes (i.e. ~10 secs/hour or 4
> > minutes per day). This seems to be too much f
Hi,
Alexander Puchmayr a écrit :
> I think I have a problem with the system time, which is considerable too
> slow.
> It looses about 3 seconds every 20 minutes (i.e. ~10 secs/hour or 4 minutes
> per day). This seems to be too much for ntp to compensate.
Is it physical or virtual environment?
Hi there!
I think I have a problem with the system time, which is considerable too slow.
It looses about 3 seconds every 20 minutes (i.e. ~10 secs/hour or 4 minutes
per day). This seems to be too much for ntp to compensate.
When I start ntp, I get frequent "time reset" messages in the log:
200
Christopher Kern wrote:
> Hope this helps...
>
>
> When investigating this myself, I found that I needed to set up a link
> to the service in /etc/init.d with this command as the root user:
>
> "cd /etc/runlevels/default && ln -s /etc/init.d/ntp-client ." (no
> quotes, of course)
>
> This works
Roger Mason wrote:
>
> I may be leading you astray, but that IP address looks like one for a private
> net. Is ntp-client
> looking on that private net for a time-server?
>
It is a private net, but ntp-client is looking at pool.ntp.org for the
time server.
John
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mail
John Blinka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The laptop is old enough that the ethernet connection is by a Xircom
> pcmcia card, and this
> works well except for ntp-client. The claim that "net.eth0 could not be
> started" puzzles
> me since, after the machine boots, ifconfig gives
>
> eth0 Lin
Hi,
I have a very old Dell P150ST laptop that I try to maintain Gentoo on.
Every time I boot it,
it complains "ERROR: cannot start ntp-client as net.eth0 could not be
started".
The laptop is old enough that the ethernet connection is by a Xircom
pcmcia card, and this
works well except for ntp-cl
On Tuesday 26 September 2006 14:05, Hans-Werner Hilse wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 22:28:28 +0100 Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> > Hmm, for some reason my ISP's ntp server does not work with my Gentoo
> > (it works with WinXP):
> > [...]
> > What's this "port time unreachable" messag
Hi,
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 22:28:28 +0100 Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hmm, for some reason my ISP's ntp server does not work with my Gentoo
> (it works with WinXP):
> [...]
> What's this "port time unreachable" message - the rdate command times
> out of course.
Well, the "time" port (37 tcp/u
On Friday 22 September 2006 14:48, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 14:26:20 +0100, Mick wrote:
> > For a laptop . . .
> >
> > What do/would you use and why?
>
> ntp assumes a permanent connection, so chrony is probably a better
> solution. I thin it was originally intended for dialup use
On Friday 22 September 2006 18:41, Dale wrote:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 14:26:20 +0100, Mick wrote:
> >> For a laptop . . .
> >>
> >> What do/would you use and why?
> >
> > ntp assumes a permanent connection, so chrony is probably a better
> > solution. I thin it was originall
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 14:26:20 +0100, Mick wrote:
>
>
>> For a laptop . . .
>>
>> What do/would you use and why?
>>
>
> ntp assumes a permanent connection, so chrony is probably a better
> solution. I thin it was originally intended for dialup use, but is well
> suite
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 14:26:20 +0100, Mick wrote:
> For a laptop . . .
>
> What do/would you use and why?
ntp assumes a permanent connection, so chrony is probably a better
solution. I thin it was originally intended for dialup use, but is well
suited to a laptop with an intermittent Internet co
On Friday 22 September 2006 14:26, Mick wrote:
> For a laptop . . .
>
> What do/would you use and why?
>
> I can't be bothered setting my clock manually anymore and thought of moving
> on with the times (pun intended). :)
openntpd, it's easy. Install, run.
--
Mike Williams
--
gentoo-user@gento
For a laptop . . .
What do/would you use and why?
I can't be bothered setting my clock manually anymore and thought of moving on
with the times (pun intended). :)
--
Regards,
Mick
pgpzGJxCqThQR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi all,
I seem to have a bit of a problem with ntp and am hoping someone here
can steer me in the direction of a fix.
I have one of your typical home setups, linux server doing firewall,
samba, ntp, etc etc. with a couple of M$ workstations/laptops as
clients. On boot on the M$ machines I h
On 4/10/06, Francesco Riosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please, compress with "bzip" or use bugzilla for this kind of
> issues/attachments.
I'll take the blame for this, since I asked Michael to post it. Sorry
all. I should suggested either to compress it or send it to me
privately.
-Richard
Michael W. Holdeman wrote:
On Sunday 09 April 2006 15:07, Richard Fish wrote:
On 4/9/06, Michael W. Holdeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
configure: error: mysql configure failed. Please check config.log for
more information.
The config.log file can be found in
/var/tmp/portage/ph
Am Montag 10 April 2006 00:21 schrieb Richard Fish:
> Not a bug in the autoconf package, but in the autoconf scripts for php.
That's what I meant... Anyway, I didn't know that msql wasn't available in
portage, and I personally have yet to see the warning you referenced. Good to
know such a beast
On Sunday 09 April 2006 18:21, Richard Fish wrote:
> On 4/9/06, Heiko Wundram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This awfully sounds like a bug in autoconf, because just before the mysql
> > stuff it checks for msql, and finds out that the support is broken (and
> > doesn't barf on that!), but still tr
On 4/9/06, Heiko Wundram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This awfully sounds like a bug in autoconf, because just before the mysql
> stuff it checks for msql, and finds out that the support is broken (and
> doesn't barf on that!), but still tries to link against libmsql later on in
> the autoconf run.
Am Sonntag 09 April 2006 21:45 schrieb Michael W. Holdeman:
>
The problem isn't that mysql can't be found (is broken), but that autoconf
thinks you have msql installed (which is also some form of SQL database, but
more in the style of SQLite, IIRC, but anyway, probably not what you want).
The
On 4/9/06, Michael W. Holdeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> configure: error: mysql configure failed. Please check config.log for more
> information.
The config.log file can be found in
/var/tmp/portage/php-5.1.2/work/php-5.1.2/config.log. You can look
there for clues, or post it here if you need
I can't seem to get php to build.
checking for mysql_close in -lmysqlclient... no
checking for mysql_error in -lmysqlclient... no
configure: error: mysql configure failed. Please check config.log for more
information.
!!! ERROR: dev-lang/php-5.1.2 failed.
Call stack:
ebuild.sh, line 1532: Ca
On Monday 13 March 2006 12:22 am, Rumen Yotov wrote:
> On Sunday 12 March 2006 19:43, David Corbin wrote:
> > On Sunday 12 March 2006 04:28 pm, Peter Ruskin wrote:
> > > On Sunday 12 March 2006 20:16, David Corbin wrote:
> > > > ntp-client is in my "default" run level. However, when I it runs
> >
On Sunday 12 March 2006 19:43, David Corbin wrote:
> On Sunday 12 March 2006 04:28 pm, Peter Ruskin wrote:
> > On Sunday 12 March 2006 20:16, David Corbin wrote:
> > > ntp-client is in my "default" run level. However, when I it runs
> > > at boot time, I get this error message:
> > >
> > > 12 Mar
On Sunday 12 March 2006 04:28 pm, Peter Ruskin wrote:
> On Sunday 12 March 2006 20:16, David Corbin wrote:
> > ntp-client is in my "default" run level. However, when I it runs
> > at boot time, I get this error message:
> >
> > 12 Mar 09:06:24 ntpd[9516]: cap_set_proc() failed to drop root
> > pri
ntp-client is in my "default" run level. However, when I it runs at boot
time, I get this error message:
12 Mar 09:06:24 ntpd[9516]: cap_set_proc() failed to drop root privileges:
Operation not permitted
12 Mar 09:06:26 ntpd[9561]: parent died before we finished, exiting
If I run it as root m
On Wednesday 22 February 2006 13:13, "Brandon Enright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote about 'RE: [gentoo-user] NTP problem':
> Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
> I can't speak for others but my experience with pool.ntp.org has been
> very poor. Some of the servers
Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
> Brandon Enright wrote:
>
> >
> > So from your output a couple issues stick out. You're only peering with
> > one machine which generally doesn't work so well. You're probably
> > better off just using ntpdate periodically if you are only going to
> > sample one server.
On Wednesday 22 February 2006 12:38, "Anthony E. Caudel"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] NTP problem':
> Brandon Enright wrote:
> Well, overnight it only reset twice; - some improvement!
>
> Here is my complete ntp.conf:
> # Name of the
Brandon Enright wrote:
>
> So from your output a couple issues stick out. You're only peering with
> one machine which generally doesn't work so well. You're probably
> better off just using ntpdate periodically if you are only going to
> sample one server.
>
> Also, the delay on the server yo
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 02:41 -0600, Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
> Brandon Enright wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 01:32 -0600, Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
> >
> >>My system was off about 10 days and when I turned it back on, I began
> >>getting these messages in my logwatch:
> >>
> >>"Time Reset
> >>
Brandon Enright wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 01:32 -0600, Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
>
>>My system was off about 10 days and when I turned it back on, I began
>>getting these messages in my logwatch:
>>
>>"Time Reset
>> time stepped -0.133773
>> time stepped -0.662954
>> time stepped +0.2711
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 01:32 -0600, Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
> My system was off about 10 days and when I turned it back on, I began
> getting these messages in my logwatch:
>
> "Time Reset
>time stepped -0.133773
>time stepped -0.662954
>time stepped +0.271164
>time stepped +0.4612
My system was off about 10 days and when I turned it back on, I began
getting these messages in my logwatch:
"Time Reset
time stepped -0.133773
time stepped -0.662954
time stepped +0.271164
time stepped +0.461200
time stepped -0.787647
Time Reset 25 times (total: -1.239782 s ave
Make sure you have told you firewall to allow port 123 for both TCP & UDP.I had the same behavior until I did that.dcmOn 1/9/06,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been struggling with ntp for some time now. I've followed thegentoo wiki HOWTO for ntp:http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've been struggling with ntp for some time now. I've followed the
> gentoo wiki HOWTO for ntp:
>
> http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Setup_MythTV#NTP
>
> As well as many other sources over the months. Basically, ntpq
> shows that I am not synchronized to any peers:
>
>
I've been struggling with ntp for some time now. I've followed the
gentoo wiki HOWTO for ntp:
http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Setup_MythTV#NTP
As well as many other sources over the months. Basically, ntpq
shows that I am not synchronized to any peers:
# ntpq -p
remote refid
I submitted this as a bug.
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105725
> -Original Message-
> From: Daevid Vincent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 2:09 PM
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: [gentoo-user] ntp-client starting
On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 18:13:47 -0400, Dave Nebinger wrote:
> I'm willing to gues that in the OP's case the ifplugd is not setting
> the "provide net" flag correctly and/or it is setting the flag before a
> cable is actually connected. In any case it's probably down & dirty
> with the gentoo network
On Sep 9, 2005, at 5:13 PM, Dave Nebinger wrote:
So shouldn't it wait till the network has started and I have an
IP address
from ifplugd?
Well, isn't the problem here that the network isn't being
requested to
start (until ntp tries to make a connection, which of course
attempts to
sta
So shouldn't it wait till the network has started and I have an IP
address
from ifplugd?
Well, isn't the problem here that the network isn't being requested to
start (until ntp tries to make a connection, which of course attempts to
start it, but then it's too late)?
[snip]
So I would sugge
Daevid Vincent schreef:
> What determines the order that things in rc-update (/etc/init.d) start?
>
> I run ifplugd, and I notice that (as the title says), ntp-client is starting
> before net.eth0 and therefore can't find the pool.ntp.org site (of course).
>
> /etc/init.d/ntp-client shows
>
> de
On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 14:08 -0700, Daevid Vincent wrote:
> What determines the order that things in rc-update (/etc/init.d) start?
>
> I run ifplugd, and I notice that (as the title says), ntp-client is starting
> before net.eth0 and therefore can't find the pool.ntp.org site (of course).
Look at
What determines the order that things in rc-update (/etc/init.d) start?
I run ifplugd, and I notice that (as the title says), ntp-client is starting
before net.eth0 and therefore can't find the pool.ntp.org site (of course).
/etc/init.d/ntp-client shows
depend()
{
before cron portmap
try 'dhcpcd_eth0="-dRNDt 5"'
ntp will refuse to sync if it sees too much drift/too much time
difference between itself and the upstream. Its not overly verbose in
telling you this however.
add "tinker panic 0" as the first line to each ntp.conf (inc your
server)
Its also a good idea to add a de
> From:: Bruno Lustosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] ntp problem
> Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 14:50:43 -0300
> On 8/23/05, Michael Kintzios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Have you set all the internal clien
On 8/23/05, Michael Kintzios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have you set all the internal clients up as stratum 3, your internal
> server as stratum 2 and your external reference timeservers as stratum
> 1?
No, but do I have to do this manually?
It seems ntp can discover the stratum of the servers b
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruno Lustosa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 23 August 2005 15:30
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] ntp problem
>
>
> On 8/23/05, Uwe Thiem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > timeserver
On 8/23/05, Uwe Thiem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> timeserver 217.160.252.229 3 u 26 64 3770.214 46927.6
> ^^^
> This isn't 192.158.7.1.
Yes, I know. This is the external reference ntp server used by the
timeserver, not by the client. This ip is on th
Just as a sidenote. My machine is running dhcpcd, and it sometimes
overwrites /etc/ntp.conf for some reason, even though I have
'dhcpcd_eth0="-N"' on /etc/conf.d/net.
I don't know how to make dhcpcd leave /etc/ntp.conf alone OR make it
write a correct ntp.conf (without a bunch of 'restrict' lines).
On 8/23/05, krzaq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> H...
> If you specify one timeserver, ntp cannot tell which clock is drifting
> away (local
> or remote). Ntpd trusts the local clock more than the remote one.
> Large offsets cause ntpd to discard 192.168.7.1 as reliable timesource.
> Try adding o
On 8/23/05, Bruno Lustosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/23/05, kashani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That offset looks rather large. NTP really wants to make constant small
> > changes, not a single huge change. This is why the ntpd setup allows for
> > an immediate sync via ntpdate before sta
On 23 August 2005 13:36, Bruno Lustosa wrote:
> Hello. I'm running ntpd as server on one of my machines, and it keeps
> itself in sync with 6 time servers around the globe. The
> synchronization works very well.
> The problem is when I try to get the other machines on the network to
> sync themselv
Bruno Lustosa wrote:
Hello. I'm running ntpd as server on one of my machines, and it keeps
itself in sync with 6 time servers around the globe. The
synchronization works very well.
The problem is when I try to get the other machines on the network to
sync themselves with this one server. Most of
On 8/23/05, kashani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That offset looks rather large. NTP really wants to make constant small
> changes, not a single huge change. This is why the ntpd setup allows for
> an immediate sync via ntpdate before starting the daemon. To fix this
> I'd shut down ntpd, run ntpda
On 8/23/05, krzaq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am no NTP expert, but there may be nothing wrong with your configuartion.
> NTP is a complex protocol. The machine has decided not to sync
> with the requested server. It thinks that the provided server is inacurate
> (the
> machine's internal clock
On 8/23/05, Bruno Lustosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello. I'm running ntpd as server on one of my machines, and it keeps
> itself in sync with 6 time servers around the globe. The
> synchronization works very well.
> The problem is when I try to get the other machines on the network to
> sync t
Hello. I'm running ntpd as server on one of my machines, and it keeps
itself in sync with 6 time servers around the globe. The
synchronization works very well.
The problem is when I try to get the other machines on the network to
sync themselves with this one server. Most of them are running linux
* Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-04-20 10:30]:
> I'm sorry to ask something so basic, but is there an Idiot's Guide to
> Time Syncronization on Gentoo Linux anywhere? I just can't figure the
> dumb thing out. :-(
try openntpd which is as simple as emerge openntpd
I don't remember if I had to ch
Make a cron job that runs this command once a day: ntpdate
time.datum.com. Works really well for me. I hope this helps.
Scott JonesOn 4/20/05, Dirk Heinrichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 20. April 2005 15:41 schrieb ext Ciaran McCreesh:> On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 14:49:32 +0200 Dirk Heinri
Am Mittwoch, 20. April 2005 15:41 schrieb ext Ciaran McCreesh:
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 14:49:32 +0200 Dirk Heinrichs
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | Am Mittwoch, 20. April 2005 14:29 schrieb ext Ciaran McCreesh:
> | > rdate -s ntp.foo.com
> |
> | Sorry, but no. rdate != ntp.
>
> Actually, yes. The
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 14:49:32 +0200 Dirk Heinrichs
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Am Mittwoch, 20. April 2005 14:29 schrieb ext Ciaran McCreesh:
| > On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 03:21:38 -0400 Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > wrote:
| > | I'm sorry to ask something so basic, but is there an Idiot's Guide
| > | to
Am Mittwoch, 20. April 2005 14:29 schrieb ext Ciaran McCreesh:
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 03:21:38 -0400 Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | I'm sorry to ask something so basic, but is there an Idiot's Guide to
> | Time Syncronization on Gentoo Linux anywhere? I just can't figure the
> | dumb thing out.
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 03:21:38 -0400 Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I'm sorry to ask something so basic, but is there an Idiot's Guide to
| Time Syncronization on Gentoo Linux anywhere? I just can't figure the
| dumb thing out. :-(
emerge rdate
rdate -s ntp.foo.com
--
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 03:21 -0400, Peng wrote:
> I'm sorry to ask something so basic, but is there an Idiot's Guide to
> Time Syncronization on Gentoo Linux anywhere? I just can't figure the
> dumb thing out. :-(
>
> --
>
Hi,
try this one:
http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_NTP
--
I'm sorry to ask something so basic, but is there an Idiot's Guide to
Time Syncronization on Gentoo Linux anywhere? I just can't figure the
dumb thing out. :-(
--
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
88 matches
Mail list logo
