Am Donnerstag, 21. April 2005 16:04 schrieb ext fire-eyes:
> So I'm using a 2.6 kernel, and trying to figure out how to cause eth0
> and eth1 to swap. That is, eth0 start up as eth1, and eth1 start up as
> eth0.
>
> Any more ideas?
In case you're using udev, you can give them whatever name you wa
On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 17:46 +0200, Bert Buchholz wrote:
> On Thu 21.04 10:04, fire-eyes wrote:
> > So I'm using a 2.6 kernel, and trying to figure out how to cause eth0
> > and eth1 to swap. That is, eth0 start up as eth1, and eth1 start up as
> > eth0.
>
> Simply use nameif to name your NICs base
On Thu 21.04 10:04, fire-eyes wrote:
> So I'm using a 2.6 kernel, and trying to figure out how to cause eth0
> and eth1 to swap. That is, eth0 start up as eth1, and eth1 start up as
> eth0.
Simply use nameif to name your NICs based on their MAC address.
Bert
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing lis
On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 16:14 +0100, Jonathan Wright wrote:
> fire-eyes wrote:
> > My understanding was that ether= was for 2.4 kernels, in fact the docs
> > for 2.6 say netdev= is the replace ment, but at this point i'm willing
> > to try.
>
> Continuing the search, I've found this page:
>
> http:
fire-eyes wrote:
My understanding was that ether= was for 2.4 kernels, in fact the docs
for 2.6 say netdev= is the replace ment, but at this point i'm willing
to try.
Continuing the search, I've found this page:
http://www.science.uva.nl/research/air/wiki/LogicalInterfaceNames
They've put irq= befo
On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 15:51 +0100, Jonathan Wright wrote:
> fire-eyes wrote:
> > I would do this however one of them is built into the motherboard.
> >
> > I found a document which claimed with grub all Ihad to do was
> > netdev=irq=24,name=eth0 however I tried this, a few variations, and
> > eve
fire-eyes wrote:
I would do this however one of them is built into the motherboard.
I found a document which claimed with grub all Ihad to do was
netdev=irq=24,name=eth0 however I tried this, a few variations, and
even used two netdev statements, one for each card and it still didn't
swap.
Yeesh,
On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 15:33 +0100, Jonathan Wright wrote:
> fire-eyes wrote:
> > Well, my fault for not mentioning. But I don't enable module loading
> > support on servers, it is a security risk.
>
> Fair enough. I've done the same on my servers. What's the possibility of
> moving the cards arou
fire-eyes wrote:
Well, my fault for not mentioning. But I don't enable module loading
support on servers, it is a security risk.
Fair enough. I've done the same on my servers. What's the possibility of
moving the cards around? The kernel will detect and load them in a
different order then.
--
Jo
fire-eyes wrote:
So I'm using a 2.6 kernel, and trying to figure out how to cause eth0
and eth1 to swap. That is, eth0 start up as eth1, and eth1 start up as
eth0.
I was told here about the netdev argument to the kernel. I tried about 9
different ways of using this, but the documentation isn't exac
On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 22:12 +0800, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 10:04 -0400, fire-eyes wrote:
> > So I'm using a 2.6 kernel, and trying to figure out how to cause eth0
> > and eth1 to swap. That is, eth0 start up as eth1, and eth1 start up as
> > eth0.
> >
>
> Perhaps you can try th
On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 10:04 -0400, fire-eyes wrote:
> So I'm using a 2.6 kernel, and trying to figure out how to cause eth0
> and eth1 to swap. That is, eth0 start up as eth1, and eth1 start up as
> eth0.
>
Perhaps you can try this..
compile them as module and load one after the other??
>
--
So I'm using a 2.6 kernel, and trying to figure out how to cause eth0
and eth1 to swap. That is, eth0 start up as eth1, and eth1 start up as
eth0.
I was told here about the netdev argument to the kernel. I tried about 9
different ways of using this, but the documentation isn't exactly as
clear as
13 matches
Mail list logo
