On Sat, 2022-02-19 at 10:20 -0600, Dale wrote:
>
> Thanks to both for the info. Looks to me like they would test these
> packages in a local overlay first then move when major arches are
> ready. To each his/her own. I was hoping to use the more recent
> version and not have to update for a whi
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On Sat, 2022-02-19 at 09:54 -0600, Dale wrote:
>> Howdy,
>>
>> I'm just going to point to the gentoo page for this but I'd like to know
>> why something is in the tree if it is not available to anyone due to
>> missing keywords.
>>
>> https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/
On Sat, 2022-02-19 at 09:54 -0600, Dale wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I'm just going to point to the gentoo page for this but I'd like to know
> why something is in the tree if it is not available to anyone due to
> missing keywords.
>
> https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/app-office/libreoffice
Probabl
On 2/19/22 10:54, Dale wrote:
Howdy,
I'm just going to point to the gentoo page for this but I'd like to know
why something is in the tree if it is not available to anyone due to
missing keywords.
https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/app-office/libreoffice
Also, I noticed I have packages comin
Howdy,
I'm just going to point to the gentoo page for this but I'd like to know
why something is in the tree if it is not available to anyone due to
missing keywords.
https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/app-office/libreoffice
Also, I noticed I have packages coming in from overlays or something
On 23 February 2006 22:38, Nick Smith wrote:
> > Use /etc/portage/package.keywords (with an actual keyword, instead of the
> > default ~ARCH) or your local overlay.
>
> what is the actual keyword if it doesnt have one? just add it to my
> package.keywords file and add the arch to it? i dont see how
On Thursday 23 February 2006 14:38, "Nick Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] Missing Keyword':
> > Use /etc/portage/package.keywords (with an actual keyword, instead of
> > the default ~ARCH) or your local overlay.
>
> what is th
>
> Use /etc/portage/package.keywords (with an actual keyword, instead of the
> default ~ARCH) or your local overlay.
>
what is the actual keyword if it doesnt have one? just add it to my
package.keywords file and add the arch to it? i dont see how that
would work.
> However, a missing keyword (li
On Thursday 23 February 2006 12:07, "Nick Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote about '[gentoo-user] Missing Keyword':
> ive been wondering this for a while. i know how to deal with masked
> packages, beit keyword masked or hardmasked, but ive googled and
> googl
ive been wondering this for a while. i know how to deal with masked
packages, beit keyword masked or hardmasked, but ive googled and
googled, and cant seem to find or figure out how to deal with masked
packages that are missing keywords. there is a nice document in the
wiki that explains masked p
10 matches
Mail list logo
