> I've been puzzling a bit lately over the best way to manage my kernel.
> I've always tried to keep it as minimal as possible, and I only
> enable things as I need them. I also don't build modules from the
> kernel at all.
>
> Is there a better way to go? I'm starting to think it might be bett
Dan Farrell wrote:
On Tue, 15 May 2007 12:33:22 +1200
Mark Kirkwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A friend of mine does this for his production servers:
1/ builds the known needed things into the kernel
2/ disables loadable modules completely
This is probably not suitable for some use cases...(ne
On Tuesday 15 May 2007, Dan Farrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about 'Re:
[gentoo-user] Managing my kernel':
> On Tue, 15 May 2007 09:21:17 +0200
> Etaoin Shrdlu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 15 May 2007 03:57, Dan Farrell wrote:
> > > On
On Tue, 15 May 2007 09:21:17 +0200
Etaoin Shrdlu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 May 2007 03:57, Dan Farrell wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 15 May 2007 12:33:22 +1200
> >
> > Mark Kirkwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > 1/ builds the known needed things into the kernel
> > > 2/ disables loadab
On Tuesday 15 May 2007 03:57, Dan Farrell wrote:
> On Tue, 15 May 2007 12:33:22 +1200
>
> Mark Kirkwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 1/ builds the known needed things into the kernel
> > 2/ disables loadable modules completely
> But Why? What's the benefit?
Well, disabling loadable modules
On Tue, 15 May 2007 12:33:22 +1200
Mark Kirkwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Grant wrote:
> > I've been puzzling a bit lately over the best way to manage my
> > kernel. I've always tried to keep it as minimal as possible, and I
> > only enable things as I need them. I also don't build modules fr
> -Original Message-
> From: Aleksandar L. Dimitrov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 11:16 AM
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Managing my kernel
>
>
> On Mon, 14 May 2007 22:16:04 +0100
> Neil Bothwic
Grant wrote:
I've been puzzling a bit lately over the best way to manage my kernel.
I've always tried to keep it as minimal as possible, and I only
enable things as I need them. I also don't build modules from the
kernel at all.
Is there a better way to go? I'm starting to think it might be be
On Mon, 14 May 2007 22:16:04 +0100
Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 15 May 2007 00:37:57 +0200, Aleksandar L. Dimitrov wrote:
>
> > Gentoo is actually all about keeping all of the stuff as minimal as
> > possible ;)
>
> Gentoo is all about doing what you want, not what other pe
On Tue, 15 May 2007 00:37:57 +0200, Aleksandar L. Dimitrov wrote:
> Gentoo is actually all about keeping all of the stuff as minimal as
> possible ;)
Gentoo is all about doing what you want, not what other people think you
should do. It doesn't matter whether you want all modules, all in-kernel,
On Mon, 14 May 2007 18:09:37 +0200
"Hemmann, Volker Armin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Montag, 14. Mai 2007, Grant wrote:
> > I've been puzzling a bit lately over the best way to manage my
> > kernel. I've always tried to keep it as minimal as possible, and I
> > only enable things as I need t
Grant wrote:
> I've been puzzling a bit lately over the best way to manage my kernel.
> I've always tried to keep it as minimal as possible, and I only
> enable things as I need them. I also don't build modules from the
> kernel at all.
>
> Is there a better way to go? I'm starting to think it mi
On Montag, 14. Mai 2007, Grant wrote:
> I've been puzzling a bit lately over the best way to manage my kernel.
> I've always tried to keep it as minimal as possible, and I only
> enable things as I need them. I also don't build modules from the
> kernel at all.
>
> Is there a better way to go? I
I've been puzzling a bit lately over the best way to manage my kernel.
I've always tried to keep it as minimal as possible, and I only
enable things as I need them. I also don't build modules from the
kernel at all.
Is there a better way to go? I'm starting to think it might be better
to build
14 matches
Mail list logo
