On 7/31/20 12:01 PM, james wrote:
yep, at least (2) static IPs.
You can actually get away with one static IP. It's ill advised. But it
will function.
You can also have external 3rd party secondary DNS servers that pull
from your (private) primary DNS server. You might even be able to get
On 7/31/20 1:39 PM, james wrote:
I'd like to start with a basic list/brief description of these, please?
They basically come down to two broad categories:
1) Have the ""static IP bound to an additional network interface on the
destination system and leverage routing to get from clients to it.
On 7/31/20 12:38 PM, Grant Taylor wrote:
On 7/30/20 3:05 AM, antlists wrote:
From what little I understand, IPv6 *enforces* CIDR.
Are you talking about the lack of defined classes of network; A, B, C,
D, E?? Or are you talking about hierarchical routing?
There is no concept of a class of ne
On 7/31/20 12:30 PM, Grant Taylor wrote:
On 7/29/20 5:23 PM, james wrote:
Free static IPs?
Sure.
Sign up with Hurricane Electric for an IPv6 in IPv4 tunnel and request
that they route a /56 to you.? It's free.? #hazFun
Great to know. I'll see what happens.
Note:: here in the US, it may b
On 7/30/20 3:05 AM, antlists wrote:
From what little I understand, IPv6 *enforces* CIDR.
Are you talking about the lack of defined classes of network; A, B, C,
D, E? Or are you talking about hierarchical routing?
There is no concept of a class of network in IPv6.
Hierarchical routing is a
On 7/29/20 5:23 PM, james wrote:
Free static IPs?
Sure.
Sign up with Hurricane Electric for an IPv6 in IPv4 tunnel and request
that they route a /56 to you. It's free. #hazFun
Note:: here in the US, it may be easier and better, to just purchase
an assignment, that renders them yours.
S
* antli...@youngman.org.uk:
> An ISP will then be allocated the next 16 bits, giving them a 32-bit
> address space to allocate to their customers - each ISP will have an
> address space the size of IPv4?!
ISPs can ask for several address spaces, each of which had a much,
*much* larger address spa
On 30/07/2020 14:28, Remco Rijnders wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 01:48:05PM +0100, antlists wrote in
:
I don't think an ISP is supposed to allocate less ...
I think your original message was open for multiple interpretations,
or at least I read it as you saying there are 32 bit addresses the
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 01:48:05PM +0100, antlists wrote in
:
I don't think an ISP is supposed to allocate less ...
I think your original message was open for multiple interpretations,
or at least I read it as you saying there are 32 bit addresses the ISP
allocates from. I now see the alternate
On 30/07/2020 12:13, Remco Rijnders wrote:
An IPv6 address is 128 bits in length. Usually an ISP allocates 64
bits to a single customer, allowing the systems on/behind that
connection to automatically assign themselves an address based on
their MAC address for example. Note that also allocations b
Point is though, with IPv6 addresses are no longer a scarce
commodity. The cost to an ISP to give you one IPv6 address (/128) is
just the same as given you enough room for your own IPv4 internet
(/64).
Oops, brain freeze. A /64 gives you enough room for an IPv4 internet
of IPv4 networks as IPv4
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 10:05:46AM +0100, antlists wrote in
:
From what little I understand, IPv6 *enforces* CIDR. So, of the 64
network bits, maybe the first 16 bits are allocated to each high level
allocator eg RIPE, ARIN etc. An ISP will then be allocated the next 16
bits, giving them a 32-b
On 30/07/2020 00:23, james wrote:
Very, Very interested in this thread.
Another quesiton. If you have (2) blocks of IP6 address,
can you use BGP4 (RFC 1771, 4271, 4632, 5678,5936 6198 etc ) and other
RFC based standards to manage routing and such multipath needs? Who
enforces what carriers do
On 7/29/20 5:20 AM, Wols Lists wrote:
On 29/07/20 00:11, james wrote:
On 7/28/20 12:10 PM, Wols Lists wrote:
On 28/07/20 16:01, james wrote:
(2) DNS resolvers, (?) mail-servers for a robust mail system that "I"
admin, and (1) internet facing web server and (1) internal only facing
or limited o
On 29/07/20 00:11, james wrote:
> On 7/28/20 12:10 PM, Wols Lists wrote:
>> On 28/07/20 16:01, james wrote:
>>> (2) DNS resolvers, (?) mail-servers for a robust mail system that "I"
>>> admin, and (1) internet facing web server and (1) internal only facing
>>> or limited outward facing Web server f
On 29/07/20 00:18, james wrote:
> It's the bandwidth provider's policy. Static IPs (4 or 6) requires a
> monthly fee. If you know a way around this, with full privileges one
> gets with static IP addresses, I'm all ears.?
? I can understand a fee for a static IP4 - they've run out, after
a
On 7/28/20 5:18 PM, james wrote:
If you know a way around this, with full privileges one gets with static
IP addresses, I'm all ears.?
A hack that I see used is to pick up a small VPS for a nominal monthly
fee and establish a VPN to it. Have it's IP (and ports) directed
through the VPN t
On 7/28/20 12:05 PM, Wols Lists wrote:
On 28/07/20 16:01, james wrote:
(2) DNS resolvers, (?) mail-servers for a robust mail system that "I"
admin, and (1) internet facing web server and (1) internal only facing
or limited outward facing Web server for development and security based
testing. Sta
On 7/28/20 12:10 PM, Wols Lists wrote:
On 28/07/20 16:01, james wrote:
(2) DNS resolvers, (?) mail-servers for a robust mail system that "I"
admin, and (1) internet facing web server and (1) internal only facing
or limited outward facing Web server for development and security based
testing. Sta
On 28/07/20 16:01, james wrote:
> (2) DNS resolvers, (?) mail-servers for a robust mail system that "I"
> admin, and (1) internet facing web server and (1) internal only facing
> or limited outward facing Web server for development and security based
> testing. Static IP are basically $5/month from
On 7/28/20 4:23 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Monday, 27 July 2020 22:10:59 BST james wrote:
I just ran across this document. I hope you find it relevant to your
mail issues.
https://bridge.grumpy-troll.org/2020/07/small-mailserver-bcp/
Small Mailserver Best Current Practices
Thank you James
On Monday, 27 July 2020 22:10:59 BST james wrote:
> I just ran across this document. I hope you find it relevant to your
> mail issues.
>
> https://bridge.grumpy-troll.org/2020/07/small-mailserver-bcp/
>
> Small Mailserver Best Current Practices
Thank you James.
I seem to have fixed my problem
On 7/25/20 8:09 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Sunday, 19 July 2020 15:18:32 BST I wrote:
I think I'm nearly there, but still one config problem eludes me.
The setup is fetchmail > postfix > dovecot.
Postfix is trying to deliver some mail (not all) to me@this-workstation instead
of to its own
On Sunday, 19 July 2020 15:18:32 BST I wrote:
I think I'm nearly there, but still one config problem eludes me.
The setup is fetchmail > postfix > dovecot.
Postfix is trying to deliver some mail (not all) to me@this-workstation instead
of to its own machine, and I can't see why. I've tried a
On Monday, 20 July 2020 18:25:28 BST Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 2020-07-20 12:39, antlists wrote:
> > On 20/07/2020 15:55, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> >> fatal: in parameter smtpd_relay_restrictions or
> >> smtpd_recipient_restrictions, specify at least one working instance of:
> >> reject_unauth_des
I have used "https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Mailfiltering_Gateway/en"; or
variations of for many years - currently on an lxc instance on a low
power arm server. Handles 1-200 emails (including spam) a day with
potentially up to quite a few thousand. I am using the configuration
without mysql etc.
On 2020-07-20 12:39, antlists wrote:
> On 20/07/2020 15:55, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>> fatal: in parameter smtpd_relay_restrictions or smtpd_recipient_restrictions,
>> specify at least one working instance of: reject_unauth_destination,
>> defer_unauth_destination, reject, defer, defer_if_permit or
>
On 20/07/2020 15:55, Peter Humphrey wrote:
fatal: in parameter smtpd_relay_restrictions or smtpd_recipient_restrictions,
specify at least one working instance of: reject_unauth_destination,
defer_unauth_destination, reject, defer, defer_if_permit or
check_relay_domains
Which of those restriction
On Monday, 20 July 2020 12:33:50 BST Neil Bothwick wrote:
> I use Postfix for SMTP, Dovecot for IMAP and getmail to fetch mail from a
> POP3 account (other mail is delivered directory to Postfix).
That's what I want to use, except for fetchmail instead of getmail.
I'm taking the suggestions in t
On Sun, 19 Jul 2020 15:18:32 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> I used to have a working system on a box that's now deceased [1], but
> in replicating it I'm having difficulty threading my way through the
> mutually inconsistent Gentoo mail server docs, omitting the bits I
> don't need and interpretin
On 7/19/20 8:18 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
Afternoon all,
Hi,
I'd like to set up a little box to be a local mail server. It would
receive mails from other machines on the LAN, and it would fetch
POP3 mail from my ISP and IMAP mail from google mail. KMail on my
workstation would then read the
Am Sonntag, 19. Juli 2020, 16:18:32 CEST schrieb Peter Humphrey:
> Afternoon all,
>
> I'd like to set up a little box to be a local mail server. It would receive
> mails from other machines on the LAN, and it would fetch POP3 mail from my
> ISP and IMAP mail from google mail.
For me this was a goo
Dovecot works well enough, catch is that it has some security
issues. My fix is to have it run on localhost and ssh tunnel
local ports into 143 & 25 on the in-house server. At that point
postfix + dovecot work fine for me.
--
Steven Lembark
Workhorse Computing
lemb...@wrkhors.com
+1 888 359 3
On Sunday, 19 July 2020 16:48:29 BST antlists wrote:
> On 19/07/2020 15:18, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > So I'm asking what systems other people use. I can't be unusual in what I
> > want, so there must be lots of solutions out there somewhere. Would anyone
> > like to offer me some advice?
>
> Doing
On 19/07/2020 15:18, Peter Humphrey wrote:
So I'm asking what systems other people use. I can't be unusual in what I
want, so there must be lots of solutions out there somewhere. Would anyone
like to offer me some advice?
Doing my best to remember my setup ...
Running postfix as my mail server
Afternoon all,
I'd like to set up a little box to be a local mail server. It would receive
mails from other machines on the LAN, and it would fetch POP3 mail from my ISP
and IMAP mail from google mail. KMail on my workstation would then read the
mails via IMAP. That's all. I might want to add a
36 matches
Mail list logo
