On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 10:03:59 +, Michael wrote:
> > > emerge pkg should always emerge it, whether it is installed or not.
> > > Have you added anything to EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS to alter this
> > > behaviour?
> >
> > That *could* alter it, yes. That I think *would* alter it, no.
> >
> > --buil
On Sunday, 28 November 2021 08:53:07 GMT Wols Lists wrote:
> On 28/11/2021 07:50, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 00:11:57 +, Wols Lists wrote:
> >>> Strange. try: emerge virtualbox-modules
> >>>
> >>> That should be rebuild after everuy kernel upgrade and that happens
> >>> norma
On 28/11/2021 07:50, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 00:11:57 +, Wols Lists wrote:
Strange. try: emerge virtualbox-modules
That should be rebuild after everuy kernel upgrade and that happens
normally with emerge @module-rebuild
"nothing to rebuild"
emerge pkg should always
On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 00:11:57 +, Wols Lists wrote:
> > Strange. try: emerge virtualbox-modules
> >
> > That should be rebuild after everuy kernel upgrade and that happens
> > normally with emerge @module-rebuild
> >
> "nothing to rebuild"
emerge pkg should always emerge it, whether it is
quickpg the existing modules then try the remove/reinstall fix. You can
then use "emerge -K =package" or even a manually reinstall (by coping
them over the newer ones) to replace the modules if things don't work out.
I would think in your case needing to keep kernel specific modules
around th
On 27/11/2021 22:15, Kees wrote:
>The docu says "emerge @module-rebuild".
>Both of these terminate with "nothing to rebuild".
Strange. try: emerge virtualbox-modules
That should be rebuild after everuy kernel upgrade and that happens
normally with emerge @module-rebuild
"nothing to reb
>The docu says "emerge @module-rebuild".
>Both of these terminate with "nothing to rebuild".
Strange. try: emerge virtualbox-modules
That should be rebuild after everuy kernel upgrade and that happens normally
with emerge @module-rebuild
On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 7:29 AM Wols Lists wrote:
>
> Simple problem, after a kernel upgrade, virtualbox no longer works. This
> is to be expected, of course, BUT ...
>
I can't offer any VirtualBox-specific solutions but I would try
reinstalling it as others have suggested (emerge -1
virtualbox-m
I mean that as: just reinstall Virtualbox as a first troubleshooting step.
If that works, great. If it doesn’t, then that can be marked off the list
as something that was tried.
On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 8:21 AM Wols Lists wrote:
> On 27/11/2021 13:03, Jeremy Hendricks wrote:
> > I’d recommend eme
On 27/11/2021 13:03, Jeremy Hendricks wrote:
I’d recommend emerging Virtualbox again. It should just work with emerge
@module-rebuild unless Virtualbox isn’t compatible with the newer
version of kernel.
HOW !?!?
The problem is that they are already installed, so any attempt to emerge
them fa
On Saturday, 27 November 2021 12:59:49 GMT Wols Lists wrote:
> On 27/11/2021 12:41, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Saturday, 27 November 2021 12:29:10 GMT Wols Lists wrote:
> >> Simple problem, after a kernel upgrade, virtualbox no longer works. This
> >> is to be expected, of course, BUT ...
> >>
>
I’d recommend emerging Virtualbox again. It should just work with emerge
@module-rebuild unless Virtualbox isn’t compatible with the newer version
of kernel.
On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 8:00 AM Wols Lists wrote:
> On 27/11/2021 12:41, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Saturday, 27 November 2021 12:29:10
On 27/11/2021 12:41, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Saturday, 27 November 2021 12:29:10 GMT Wols Lists wrote:
Simple problem, after a kernel upgrade, virtualbox no longer works. This
is to be expected, of course, BUT ...
How do I fix it !!!
What I always did on my old system was to re-emerge the mod
On Saturday, 27 November 2021 12:29:10 GMT Wols Lists wrote:
> Simple problem, after a kernel upgrade, virtualbox no longer works. This
> is to be expected, of course, BUT ...
>
> How do I fix it !!!
>
> What I always did on my old system was to re-emerge the modules.
>
> The docu says "emerge @
Simple problem, after a kernel upgrade, virtualbox no longer works. This
is to be expected, of course, BUT ...
How do I fix it !!!
What I always did on my old system was to re-emerge the modules.
The docu says "emerge @module-rebuild".
Both of these terminate with "nothing to rebuild".
What
On Tue, 06 Apr 2021 13:59:11 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > fwiw, I think I've always just copied the old .config across, then
> > > done "make menuconfig". I think that also just accepts defaults for
> > > anything new.
> >
> > It doesn't, it prompts for every change, with the default
> >
On Monday, 5 April 2021 19:43:29 BST Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 19:04:18 +0100, antlists wrote:
> > > For the uninitiated, the difference here is that olddefconfig will
> > > accept the default configuration value for any new/changed options,
> > > whereas oldconfig will prompt the u
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 19:04:18 +0100, antlists wrote:
> > For the uninitiated, the difference here is that olddefconfig will
> > accept the default configuration value for any new/changed options,
> > whereas oldconfig will prompt the user for input.
> >
> > The former is great if you just don't car
On 05/04/2021 15:06, Matt Connell (Gmail) wrote:
On Mon, 2021-04-05 at 13:27 +0200, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
"make olddefconfig" rather than "make oldconfig"
For the uninitiated, the difference here is that olddefconfig will
accept the default configuration value for any new/changed options,
On Mon, 2021-04-05 at 13:27 +0200, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
> "make olddefconfig" rather than "make oldconfig"
For the uninitiated, the difference here is that olddefconfig will
accept the default configuration value for any new/changed options,
whereas oldconfig will prompt the user for input.
On Mon 05 Apr 2021 13:27:01 GMT, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
> I'm always using "make olddefconfig" rather than "make oldconfig" and
> had no problems upgrading to 5.10. After running "make olddefconfig" I
> use "diff" to compare the new configuration to a backup copy of the old
> one, and shoul
On Sun 04 Apr 2021 23:56:05 GMT, Michael wrote:
> On Sunday, 4 April 2021 23:31:50 BST Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Has the 5.10 LTS has been stablised, I tried to upgrade it on some of my
> > boxes, but `make oldconfig` doesn’t want to use my old config:
> > Here is my make output: htt
Alarig,
On Monday, 2021-04-05 00:31:50 +0200, you wrote:
> ...
> Has the 5.10 LTS has been stablised, I tried to upgrade it on some of my
> boxes, but `make oldconfig` doesn’t want to use my old config:
I'm always using "make olddefconfig" rather than "make oldconfig" and
had no problems upgr
On Sunday, 4 April 2021 23:31:50 BST Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Has the 5.10 LTS has been stablised, I tried to upgrade it on some of my
> boxes, but `make oldconfig` doesn’t want to use my old config:
> Here is my make output: https://paste.swordarmor.fr/raw/2rRh
> And here is my config:
Hello,
Has the 5.10 LTS has been stablised, I tried to upgrade it on some of my
boxes, but `make oldconfig` doesn’t want to use my old config:
Here is my make output: https://paste.swordarmor.fr/raw/2rRh
And here is my config: https://paste.swordarmor.fr/raw/YHaG
Does anyone else has to redo its
On 30/12/2017 20:43, Jalus Bilieyich wrote:
> Recently there was a kernel update and I don't want to reconfigure it
> from scratch. In the official documentation, it told me to move the old
> .config into the new kernel source tree and type
> make oldconfig
>
> This is where I'm confused; which .c
This worked.
Thank you all a thousand times!
On 30/12/17 19:11, Mick wrote:
to remove the symlink pointing to the previous kernel,
to create a new symlink to the new kernel sources directory,
Or, to use the supplied gentoo tools ...
eselect kernel list
eselect kernel set n
to see what kernels the system thinks are available, and to cha
Hi Jalus,
On Saturday, 30 December 2017 18:43:12 GMT Jalus Bilieyich wrote:
> Recently there was a kernel update and I don't want to reconfigure it
> from scratch. In the official documentation, it told me to move the old
> .config into the new kernel source tree and type
> make oldconfig
>
> Thi
Hi Jalus,
> This is where I'm confused; which .config file (/proc/config.gz or
> /boot/config)
The two should have the same content most of the time. You can use
either. config.gz needs to be decompressed (e.g. with zcat).
> where in the kernel source tree do I put this file in.
In the root of
On 30/12/17 18:43, Jalus Bilieyich wrote:
Recently there was a kernel update and I don't want to reconfigure it
from scratch. In the official documentation, it told me to move the old
.config into the new kernel source tree and type
make oldconfig
This is where I'm confused; which .config file (
Recently there was a kernel update and I don't want to reconfigure it
from scratch. In the official documentation, it told me to move the old
.config into the new kernel source tree and type
make oldconfig
This is where I'm confused; which .config file (/proc/config.gz or
/boot/config) and where i
On April 27, 2016 12:59:18 PM GMT+02:00, Hans wrote:
>Tried to upgrade the kernels of my desktop and notebook fron kernel
>4.1.12 upgrade to 4.4.6. Both systems freeze during booting with 4.4.6.
>
>No dmsg, No messages logs. Previous kernel upgrades always worked
>smooth
>as silk.
>
>Using: Open
Tried to upgrade the kernels of my desktop and notebook fron kernel
4.1.12 upgrade to 4.4.6. Both systems freeze during booting with 4.4.6.
No dmsg, No messages logs. Previous kernel upgrades always worked smooth
as silk.
Using: OpenRC, eudev, Xfce,
Desktop configration:
Genkernel with /etc/g
Fzinc wrote:
Hi.
Im trying to upgrade the kernel from 2.6.35-gentoo-r12 to
linux-2.6.36-gentoo-r5 just copied the .config from the old one and
did a make oldconfig as i usually do
but when i tried to compile it got this message:
--
loc
Hi.
Im trying to upgrade the kernel from 2.6.35-gentoo-r12 to
linux-2.6.36-gentoo-r5 just copied the .config from the old one and did a
make oldconfig as i usually do
but when i tried to compile it got this message:
--
localhost linux # mak
Am 03.05.2010 18:56, schrieb Jason Dusek:
> I have an encrypted block device, `/dev/sda2', which is
> mounted as my root filesystem. I recently installed this
> system -- I've been away from Gentoo for awhile -- and used
> gentoo sources 2.6.31-r6. When the kernel upgrade rolled
> around,
Am 03.05.2010 18:56, schrieb Jason Dusek:
> I have an encrypted block device, `/dev/sda2', which is
> mounted as my root filesystem. I recently installed this
> system -- I've been away from Gentoo for awhile -- and used
> gentoo sources 2.6.31-r6. When the kernel upgrade rolled
> around,
I have an encrypted block device, `/dev/sda2', which is
mounted as my root filesystem. I recently installed this
system -- I've been away from Gentoo for awhile -- and used
gentoo sources 2.6.31-r6. When the kernel upgrade rolled
around, to 2.6.32-r7, I installed and rebooted and then my
On (03/06/09 15:40) Dale wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On Wednesday 03 June 2009 18:39:56 Dale wrote:
> >
> >> Why not copy the config from the old kernel over and run make
> >> oldconfig? May need to do some cleaning after genkernel tho.
> >>
> >
> > That's the correct way :-)
> >
> >
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 June 2009 18:39:56 Dale wrote:
>
>> Why not copy the config from the old kernel over and run make
>> oldconfig? May need to do some cleaning after genkernel tho.
>>
>
> That's the correct way :-)
>
> But the OP asked if there was some magic way to get
On Wednesday 03 June 2009 18:39:56 Dale wrote:
> >> will it respect the settings I've compiled
> >> into 2.6.28 or will they need to be reset again before 2.6.29 is
> >> compiled?
> >
> > No. Not unless you give it the old config to use. IIRC it has some
> > feature to use the config for the curre
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 June 2009 17:43:56 James Homuth wrote:
>
>> Related, however, if I do recompile it and
>> decide to do so with genkernel,
>>
>
> Yuck. I tell people to stay away from that thing.
>
> Just learn how to do it yourself. It's not hard, you get only what y
On Wednesday 03 June 2009 17:43:56 James Homuth wrote:
> I noticed yesterday gentoo-sources-2.6.29 was released, and was wondering
> if it's required that the kernel be upgraded
no
> (I'm currently running 2.6.28.
nothing wrong with that
> I did download the sources (Should I have done that?),
I noticed yesterday gentoo-sources-2.6.29 was released, and was wondering if
it's required that the kernel be upgraded (I'm currently running 2.6.28. I
did download the sources (Should I have done that?), but in the event it's
not mandatory or anything to upgrade the kernel I'd really like to not h
김무성 writes:
> For installing vmware
>
> My kernel version is 2.6.24-gentoo-r5. But I have no source files.
>
> So I downloaded source files. But that’s version 2.6.27-gentoo-r8.
>
> When I installed vmware, it told me kernel version and kernel source
> files’ version no match.
>
> I have to kernel
On Thu, 9 Apr 2009 00:19:03 -0400, Saphirus Sage wrote:
Please trim your quotes.
> I saw that, I just found it very odd that you don't keep the initramrd
> and kernel image in /boot. Therefore, I was wondering if your issue
> was having not properly configured genkernel. I've never seen anyon
[mailto:saphirus...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 11:58 AM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] kernel upgrade error. help me
±è¹«¼º wrote:
Hello list.
For installing vmware
My kernel version is 2.6.24-gentoo-r5. But I have no source files.
So I downloaded source
, 2009 11:58 AM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] kernel upgrade error. help me
±è¹«¼º wrote:
>
> Hello list.
>
>
>
> For installing vmware
>
>
>
> My kernel version is 2.6.24-gentoo-r5. But I have no source files.
>
> So I download
±è¹«¼º wrote:
>
> Hello list.
>
>
>
> For installing vmware
>
>
>
> My kernel version is 2.6.24-gentoo-r5. But I have no source files.
>
> So I downloaded source files. But that¡¯s version 2.6.27-gentoo-r8.
>
> When I installed vmware, it told me kernel version and kernel source
> files¡¯ versi
Hello list.
For installing vmware
My kernel version is 2.6.24-gentoo-r5. But I have no source files.
So I downloaded source files. But that’s version 2.6.27-gentoo-r8.
When I installed vmware, it told me kernel version and kernel source files’
version no match.
I have to kernel upgra
Hello list.
For installing vmware
My kernel version is 2.6.24-gentoo-r5. But I have no source files.
So I downloaded source files. But that’s version 2.6.27-gentoo-r8.
When I installed vmware, it told me kernel version and kernel source files’
version no match.
I have to kernel upgra
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 8:56 PM, David Relson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Dirk,
>
> Thanks for taking the time to reply. The combination of gentoo-sources
> and genkernel has been working quite well for the 2 yrs I've been
> running Gentoo. It's convenient to have grub.conf auto-magically
>
Hello Dirk,
Thanks for taking the time to reply. The combination of gentoo-sources
and genkernel has been working quite well for the 2 yrs I've been
running Gentoo. It's convenient to have grub.conf auto-magically
updated and that's not been an issue.
When upgrading from one kernel revision to
Am Dienstag, 4. November 2008 20:51:10 schrieb David Relson:
> Due to problems experienced with 2.6.25-gentoo-r7, I've built
> 2.6.27-gentoo-r2. I started with the 2.6.25-r7 .config file, ran
> "make oldconfig", then "genkernel all".
Don't know if that helps, but anyway, here's what I usually do
G'day,
Due to problems experienced with 2.6.25-gentoo-r7, I've built
2.6.27-gentoo-r2. I started with the 2.6.25-r7 .config file, ran
"make oldconfig", then "genkernel all". The new 2.6.27 kernel appears
to load modules OK, then hangs. The old 2.6.25-r7 kernel displays
"Activating mdev" after it
On Friday 22 February 2008 16:22:34 Grant wrote:
> > Too bad that 'oldconfig' isn't always working :-(
>
> Is there a better way to update the config for a new kernel?
What I do is to run menuconfig against the most recent .config, and search
(visually) for items marked [NEW] and read their Hel
On Friday 22 February 2008, Grant wrote:
> > Too bad that 'oldconfig' isn't always working :-(
>
> Is there a better way to update the config for a new kernel?
Not really.
You are dealing with a complex system of configuration settings that
react in mysterious ways. AND that seeing as this is a
> > I upgraded my router's kernel from linux-2.6.18-hardened-r6 to
> > linux-2.6.23-hardened-r7 and now I get errors when starting the
> > firewall:
> >
> > "requires NAT which is disabled"
> >
> > ERROR: Command "/sbin/iptables -A FORWARD -m state --state
> > ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT"
On (22/02/08 06:37) Grant wrote:
> I upgraded my router's kernel from linux-2.6.18-hardened-r6 to
> linux-2.6.23-hardened-r7 and now I get errors when starting the
> firewall:
>
> "requires NAT which is disabled"
>
> ERROR: Command "/sbin/iptables -A FORWARD -m state --state
> ESTABLISHED,RELATED
I upgraded my router's kernel from linux-2.6.18-hardened-r6 to
linux-2.6.23-hardened-r7 and now I get errors when starting the
firewall:
"requires NAT which is disabled"
ERROR: Command "/sbin/iptables -A FORWARD -m state --state
ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT" Failed
I used make oldconfig careful
On Friday 15 June 2007, Dale wrote:
> Well, you won't believe this but I rebooted into the newer kernel to get
> the info for you, now it works fine. O_O I have sound when I change
> desktops, it plays a CD fine, it seems to be working now.
That's so great. I couldn't find any reason why it woul
Peter Alfredsen wrote:
>
> If you post the output of this command:
> lspci -s 01:0a.0 -n
> We will have the PCI id to search for. Might make it easier to find bug
> reports.
>
> The output of this command:
> dmesg|egrep -i -A3 "(alsa|sound)"
> Should give us an idea of whether your kernel actually
On Thursday 14 June 2007, Dale wrote:
> Thanks for the info but I build everything in the kernel. I never liked
> modules. I suspect that something did change about the kernel though.
> I may just stick with the older kernel for now and try another version
> later.
>
> Still open to ideas though
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Thursday 14 June 2007, Dale wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I upgraded my kernel the other day and now I have no sound at all. I
>> have checked Alsamixer and Kmix to make sure it is not muted and it
>>
>> appears to be turned up there. This is lspci:
>>
>>> 01:0a.0 Multim
On Thursday 14 June 2007, Dale wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I upgraded my kernel the other day and now I have no sound at all. I
> have checked Alsamixer and Kmix to make sure it is not muted and it
>
> appears to be turned up there. This is lspci:
> > 01:0a.0 Multimedia audio controller: Creative Labs SB Li
Hi,
I upgraded my kernel the other day and now I have no sound at all. I
have checked Alsamixer and Kmix to make sure it is not muted and it
appears to be turned up there. This is lspci:
> 01:0a.0 Multimedia audio controller: Creative Labs SB Live! EMU10k1
> (rev 0a)
I have this built into my
hello,
here's something weird i ran into after upgrading my kernel from
2.6.18-r6 to 2.6.19-r5. now if i compile the kernel with framebuffer
enabled with vesafb-tng support and set the resolution to anything
other than [EMAIL PROTECTED] in grub, i get this error upon booting.
"Block device /dev
i've cleaned the fstab of adicional /dev/hda2(3) mount and it now works.
thank you all again
On Sat, 2005-04-16 at 19:29 +0200, Bastian Balthazar Bux wrote:
> Jose Moreira wrote:
> > Thank you. So what can i do about my problem? i've posted also to the
> > vidalinux forums. i dont have a clue abou
i did, still no go. With 2.6.9 kernel (the original) it boots, with the
2.6.10 (the new one) i get '/dev/hda3' is not a valid root device and
'CTRL-D for maintainence'
On Sat, 2005-04-16 at 19:29 +0200, Bastian Balthazar Bux wrote:
> Jose Moreira wrote:
> > Thank you. So what can i do about my prob
thank you. i'm a redhat user since RH8 and switched to gentoo based
distro's 4 days ago, so 'genkernels' and so confuse me alot.
cheers
On Sat, 2005-04-16 at 19:24 +0200, Richard Fish wrote:
> Jose Moreira wrote:
>
> >Thank you. So what can i do about my problem? i've posted also to the
> >vidal
On 4/16/05, Jose Moreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ive tried updating the fstab from ext2 to reiserfs but then it doesnt
> boot :|
>
Jose,
Sorry but I didn't keep the original message. I think the problem
Christoph was seeing was that you had something like:
/dev/BOOT / ext3.
/dev/
Jose Moreira wrote:
> Thank you. So what can i do about my problem? i've posted also to the
> vidalinux forums. i dont have a clue about whats wrong ... grrr
>
> On Sat, 2005-04-16 at 18:46 +0200, Bastian Balthazar Bux wrote:
>
>>Jose Moreira wrote:
>>
>>>i joined gentoo-users because vidalinux i
Jose Moreira wrote:
>Thank you. So what can i do about my problem? i've posted also to the
>vidalinux forums. i dont have a clue about whats wrong ... grrr
>
>
You will have to fix your fstab file. To try and make clear what others
are saying, "/dev/BOOT" and "/dev/ROOT" are not valid device n
ive tried updating the fstab from ext2 to reiserfs but then it doesnt
boot :|
On Sat, 2005-04-16 at 09:46 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On 4/16/05, Jose Moreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > i joined gentoo-users because vidalinux is gentoo-based. if i did rong
> > tell me and i'll leave, no prob.
Thank you. So what can i do about my problem? i've posted also to the
vidalinux forums. i dont have a clue about whats wrong ... grrr
On Sat, 2005-04-16 at 18:46 +0200, Bastian Balthazar Bux wrote:
> Jose Moreira wrote:
> > i joined gentoo-users because vidalinux is gentoo-based. if i did rong
> >
On 4/16/05, Jose Moreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i joined gentoo-users because vidalinux is gentoo-based. if i did rong
> tell me and i'll leave, no prob.
>
It's not wrong, but you're the first person I've seen ask about
videlinux here. I hadn't even heard of it.
Christoph's comment seems a
Jose Moreira wrote:
> i joined gentoo-users because vidalinux is gentoo-based. if i did rong
> tell me and i'll leave, no prob.
>
No probs, simply we don't know what differences exist between gentoo and
vidalinux, so you will need to "filter" the question you do on this list .
for example this ti
i joined gentoo-users because vidalinux is gentoo-based. if i did rong
tell me and i'll leave, no prob.
On Sat, 2005-04-16 at 18:09 +0200, Christoph Gysin wrote:
> Jose Moreira wrote:
>
> >hello, im trying to upgrade my kernel to 2.6.10. I'm using vidalinux
> >with genkernel. i followed a guide
>
Jose Moreira wrote:
>hello, im trying to upgrade my kernel to 2.6.10. I'm using vidalinux
>with genkernel. i followed a guide
>http://forums.vidalinux.com/viewtopic.php?t=2690&highlight=kernel
>+upgrade+2+6+10 but after reboot i get 'Error 15: File not found after
>kernel grub selection. Also a ge
hello, im trying to upgrade my kernel to 2.6.10. I'm using vidalinux
with genkernel. i followed a guide
http://forums.vidalinux.com/viewtopic.php?t=2690&highlight=kernel
+upgrade+2+6+10 but after reboot i get 'Error 15: File not found after
kernel grub selection. Also a get error stating that fsck.
81 matches
Mail list logo
