On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 12:52 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> But seriously - 600 to 1892? That can not look good.
I was going to make the same comment, along with the obligatory "who
actually spends time looking at their wallpaper change?"
Nevertheless, I think you're on the mark. Such as si
On Samstag 24 Juli 2010, alain.didierj...@free.fr wrote:
> I use a slideshow as a wallpaper on a kde4.4 desktop. Every 20 minutes, a
> new painting appear, scaled up to fit my display (1892x1392). They are
> .jpeg images, 600 pixels wide and up.
> Some appear perfectly scaled up and nice looking wh
I use a slideshow as a wallpaper on a kde4.4 desktop. Every 20 minutes, a new
painting appear, scaled up to fit my display (1892x1392). They are .jpeg images,
600 pixels wide and up.
Some appear perfectly scaled up and nice looking while other are poorly
enlarged, very soft with squarish artefacts
3 matches
Mail list logo
