Re: [gentoo-user] Interpreting /proc/cpuinfo

2009-10-10 Thread Florian Philipp
Renat Golubchyk schrieb: > Hi! > > On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 20:40:44 +0200 Florian Philipp > wrote: >> Does this output from /proc/cpuinfo make any sense: >> >> processor : 0 >> vendor_id : GenuineIntel >> cpu family : 6 >> model : 26 >> model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CP

Re: [gentoo-user] Interpreting /proc/cpuinfo

2009-10-10 Thread Florian Philipp
Volker Armin Hemmann schrieb: > On Samstag 10 Oktober 2009, Keith Dart wrote: >> === On Fri, 10/09, Florian Philipp wrote: === >> >>> Could the missing flags be related to a too old kernel (2.6.18)? >> === >> >> Yes, and also how you compile it (what processor type you choose). > > not really > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Interpreting /proc/cpuinfo

2009-10-10 Thread Renat Golubchyk
Hi! On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 20:40:44 +0200 Florian Philipp wrote: > Does this output from /proc/cpuinfo make any sense: > > processor : 0 > vendor_id : GenuineIntel > cpu family : 6 > model : 26 > model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz > stepping

Re: [gentoo-user] Interpreting /proc/cpuinfo

2009-10-09 Thread Keith Dart
=== On Sat, 10/10, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: === > First of all 2.6.18 is not only old, it is a security risk. > Seriously, why do you (OP) even bother to sent an email to the list > without first upgrading to a more recent one and checking if the > problem persists? === It's possible he's runn

Re: [gentoo-user] Interpreting /proc/cpuinfo

2009-10-09 Thread kashani
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: On Samstag 10 Oktober 2009, Keith Dart wrote: === On Fri, 10/09, Florian Philipp wrote: === Could the missing flags be related to a too old kernel (2.6.18)? === Yes, and also how you compile it (what processor type you choose). not really Also, some CPU featur

Re: [gentoo-user] Interpreting /proc/cpuinfo

2009-10-09 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Samstag 10 Oktober 2009, Keith Dart wrote: > === On Fri, 10/09, Florian Philipp wrote: === > > > Could the missing flags be related to a too old kernel (2.6.18)? > > === > > Yes, and also how you compile it (what processor type you choose). not really > Also, some CPU features are altered b

Re: [gentoo-user] Interpreting /proc/cpuinfo

2009-10-09 Thread Keith Dart
=== On Fri, 10/09, Florian Philipp wrote: === > Could the missing flags be related to a too old kernel (2.6.18)? === Yes, and also how you compile it (what processor type you choose). Also, some CPU features are altered by the BIOS settings. -- Keith Dart -- -- Keith Dart

[gentoo-user] Interpreting /proc/cpuinfo

2009-10-09 Thread Florian Philipp
Hi list! Does this output from /proc/cpuinfo make any sense: processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 26 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz stepping: 5 cpu MHz : 141.318 cache size : 8192 KB physic